Author Topic: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?  (Read 34518 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SShoreFan 2.0

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 629
  • Tommy Points: 201
1. No.
2. {expletive deleted) no!!

yeah, what he said..........even if it was deleted.
I love my kids, call me a sap - it's true.

Re: I don't think Posey is going to resign now . (just opinion)
« Reply #106 on: July 04, 2008, 05:36:47 PM »

Offline timepiece33

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1747
  • Tommy Points: 78
By watching them play. They're quite underrated defensively, they'll be more than adequate in our system. Our definition of good might vary, at the least they're a bit better than average defenders. That's good enough for me if you upgrade the PG position vastly.

If underrated = well below average instead of bad, maybe I can see your point.   Barnes is heavy footed defensively, which is why he spent most of his early career at PF.  Jones is not a good defender and hangs out in the perimeter which makes his rebound rates not very good.  I simply don't see it with either of these guys.

Pietrus?  Maybe.  Bonzi Wells?  If he weren't certifiable. 

Also, I feel you've overrated Roger Mason offensively.  He's an adequate ball handler.  Plus, last year was kind of an anomaly with regards to his shooting. 

I agree with you. That's why if you give Posey full MLE, and all you get is House (which I doubt we can get at the vet. min.), you need to sign Tony.

I'm pretty sure we can secure House at the non birds rights figure for a year.

See no reason to sign Tony at all.  We've essentially replaced him with our picks.   
« Last Edit: July 04, 2008, 05:44:05 PM by timepiece33 »

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #107 on: July 04, 2008, 05:38:34 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52802
  • Tommy Points: 2568
No way is Mason there for the vet. min. He could be there for the LLE, I think it might be a bit low for him still, but that'll probably be used for a Center in my opinion. If you don't give the LLE to a Center, then we'll have to find a center via the vet. min. then. I'd preffer if we spend on one.
I don't think that there will be any substantial difference between the center available for the LLE or the minimum. It's a poor market with comparable talents. I think the team will likely get a bigger bump in talent and impact on a guard at LLE versus the minimum rather than a big man.

I think you're overrating Mason's market value (market value, not basketball value). Or maybe I'm underrating it - have there been a lot of stories linking him to destinations? Teams asking him to visit? I haven't seen much, then again I haven't been looking.

Re: I don't think Posey is going to resign now . (just opinion)
« Reply #108 on: July 04, 2008, 05:55:20 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
By watching them play. They're quite underrated defensively, they'll be more than adequate in our system. Our definition of good might vary, at the least they're a bit better than average defenders. That's good enough for me if you upgrade the PG position vastly.

If underrated = well below average instead of bad, maybe I can see your point.   Barnes is heavy footed defensively, which is why he spent most of his early career at PF.  Jones is not a good defender and hangs out in the perimeter which makes his rebound rates not very good.  I simply don't see it with either of these guys.

Pietrus?  Maybe.  Bonzi Wells?  If he weren't certifiable. 

Also, I feel you've overrated Roger Mason offensively.  He's an adequate ball handler.  Plus, last year was kind of an anomaly with regards to his shooting. 

I agree with you. That's why if you give Posey full MLE, and all you get is House (which I doubt we can get at the vet. min.), you need to sign Tony.

I'm pretty sure we can secure House at the non birds rights figure for a year.

See no reason to sign Tony at all.  We've essentially replaced him with our picks.   

Lol, I was just editing my post... I had forgotten about non-bird rights. Anyways, the point still stands.

I haven't overrated Roger Mason offensively one bit. He's a poorer shooter than House, but the fact that he can attack the basket and create for himself makes him a better offensive player than House. House is great as a spot up shooter, that's it... it's not hard to have a better offensive player than him.

Anyways, I'm done with the whole SF discussion... it's all about different perspectives because I think they can be useful in our defensive system, and that's all that matters to me to tell you the truth. The reason I'm done with the discussino is because we're going to have Corey, and that'll be the end of it.

I don't want to rely in our picks. If you guys think that they're up to the job, including Pruitt, then we're in great shape. I'd still want an athletic two in addition to Giddens to have a potentially very good small ball unit that should be capable of defending, but I'm done discussing that too... it's taken over too many threads already, no need to discuss it again here.

No way is Mason there for the vet. min. He could be there for the LLE, I think it might be a bit low for him still, but that'll probably be used for a Center in my opinion. If you don't give the LLE to a Center, then we'll have to find a center via the vet. min. then. I'd preffer if we spend on one.
I don't think that there will be any substantial difference between the center available for the LLE or the minimum. It's a poor market with comparable talents. I think the team will likely get a bigger bump in talent and impact on a guard at LLE versus the minimum rather than a big man.

I think you're overrating Mason's market value (market value, not basketball value). Or maybe I'm underrating it - have there been a lot of stories linking him to destinations? Teams asking him to visit? I haven't seen much, then again I haven't been looking.

Oh surely, I'd spend the LLE on a PG over a big man in this current market in a heart beat... it'll depend though, who knows. I don't like the PG market either.

It's not really that I'm overrating Mason's market value, but maybe you haven't seen how low the vet. min. is. He had a good season last year, he's looking for a pay day. You may be right, he might be had for the LLE. If we can have him and Posey, then I'd be more than ecstatic... I see him getting somewhere in the 2 million range though. Maybe 2 millions might be a bit too much for him, but people will see his last season and some team will give it to him... in this stage of his career he's probably looking to get paid.

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #109 on: July 04, 2008, 05:58:01 PM »

Offline ruben_wolkowyski

  • Jordan Walsh
  • Posts: 24
  • Tommy Points: 1
I was a Ricky D fan when the team was awful, because he was colorful and made some tragic games otherwise worth watching. But that feels like a lifetime ago!

No, no, no, a thousand times no.

Re: I don't think Posey is going to resign now . (just opinion)
« Reply #110 on: July 04, 2008, 06:06:41 PM »

Offline EJPLAYA

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3816
  • Tommy Points: 127

Quote
If we could only get TA's money and offer it to someone, but it doesn't work that way. We'd be restricted to the vet. min. wether we have TA or not. and if it's spent on someone else, who would accept to play for the vet. min. who would you have in mind that is a better fit? I'm having a tough time finding someone, maybe you'd have better luck.

You don't give full MLE to Posey, and then you have a good chance of finding someone.

I don't like House and his small body in there alone.

Give me Bonzi Wells who will likely need to sign a Posey like 1 year with player option for the second type contract for cheap. Give me Devin Brown, Jarvis Hayes, Kareem Rush, Kirk Snyder... ANY of those guys can fill TA's shoes much better.

Out of all of those maybe, just maybe Kareem Rush could be had... and I'd take TA over him in a heart beat. The others are impossible under the scenario that has been discussed here, Posey getting the full MLE.

None of those guys will be had for the minimum, and even doubt Kareem Rush can be had for the minimum. He's got a good enough shooting stroke for some team to give him a bit of money.

Guarantee that at least one of those guys can be had for the vet minimum. You're not hearing any of their names out there being discussed for that reason. I know some of them will sign for a bit more, but every one of those guys are upgrades over TA who can't dribble, shoot, and is dumb as a post out there. Kareem Rush can flat out shoot the ball, however has bounced around the league. He needs the ability to be in the spotlight and show what he can do. Signing a 2 yr deal with that second as a player option for cheap like Posey and House did would be a very smart move. He is twice the player TA is though. ONe problem however is that it would be likely for him to resign with the Pacers as his brother was just added there.

When you include Damon Stoudemire as a viable PG option I have to question your scouting prowess a bit though ;)

He is way finished in this league as far as valuable PG's. He was horrible for the Spurs last year. I even think Cassell has more left in his tank than Stoudemire. If you've read my opinions on him then you know that is saying something!

Backaway a little bit and read this thread carefully. I've never mentioned Damon, nor would I want him. Now that's out of the way, let's get tackle the other issues.

Full MLE on Posey = this means there won't be a House/Posey type of deal for Rush. He won't sign for the vet. min. For someone that is supposed to be a good shooter, he has plain sucked. He makes no sense for us, TA at the least is a better defender. Rush has gotten his chances, he has sucked. Not worth discussing anyways, Danny won't go after him 100% sure about that.

That's all you got then, Kareem Rush... that's your answer?



First off. My mistake! It was timepiece that threw him out as a viable option. I redirect my needling towards his post! Sorry. These "pages" of quotes and re-quotes does a number on us"!

Interesting how Rush has gotten better and better from 3 pt land in his career and the last three seasons shot between 35% and almost 39% this past season. That isn't a poor shooter. It's better than Posey's numbers and just shy of Ray's. He is a very good knockdown 3 pt shooter. He's a 90% free throw shooter as well. He's a very viable bench option that spreads the floor and gives that second unit some scoring punch from the outside. He made the same as Powe did last year. He very well may be available at a decent price.

As far as that being all I have, I gave you names of other guys that I think are better than TA out there. All of them are options. Just because you don't like them as options doesn't mean they aren't valid, or that your assessment of them is accurate. I do know what I see in TA though and that is absolute garbage. He's not even that solid of a defender anymore. I hope he recovers from his injury and gets that part of his game back, because if he doesn't he won't be in this league very long.

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #111 on: July 04, 2008, 06:11:20 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Quote
As far as that being all I have, I gave you names of other guys that I think are better than TA out there. All of them are options. Just because you don't like them as options doesn't mean they aren't valid, or that your assessment of them is accurate. I do know what I see in TA though and that is absolute garbage. He's not even that solid of a defender anymore. I hope he recovers from his injury and gets that part of his game back, because if he doesn't he won't be in this league very long.


The main problem is not wether I like them or not, the problem is wether they can be had or not. I highly doubt it.

As far as me not liking them and you liking them is a non-issue to me. If you feel comfortable with them fine, I don't even want to argue that. I think TA brings more to the table than some of them. But the real question is can they be had. I think not.

We get Posey for 3.2 million and House at whatever, and suddenly we start believing people will come here to play for nothing? I don't see it.

Anyways, other than it would be quite difficult to have any of them... they don't fit the role I want TA playing. I also only suggested TA in the case that all we get is Posey and House. Time and time again I've said that TA's replacement should be a decent sized SG that can play some point or a big PG that can guard SG. This role may very well be fulfilled by Pruitt, but I don't want to rely on him. This will give us versatility in our units both offensively and defensively, plus give us decent depth.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2008, 06:40:18 PM by BudweiserCeltic »

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #112 on: July 04, 2008, 06:21:25 PM »

Offline goCeltics

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1922
  • Tommy Points: 71
I would go matt barnes if we could, rather barnes than maggette i have posey > barnes > maggette

Re: I don't think Posey is going to resign now . (just opinion)
« Reply #113 on: July 04, 2008, 07:16:25 PM »

Offline timepiece33

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1747
  • Tommy Points: 78
I haven't overrated Roger Mason offensively one bit. He's a poorer shooter than House, but the fact that he can attack the basket and create for himself makes him a better offensive player than House. House is great as a spot up shooter, that's it... it's not hard to have a better offensive player than him.

Depends on what you are looking for in this offense system.   House creates spacing and is rarely not on the floor with Pierce who plays the distribution role. Mason can create his own shot, but he's not much of a distributor.  Personally, I don't believe that a guy with a below average shot who can create one provides as much value as you.

Offensively, I see House as more useful in general.  Defensively, I agreed that Mason was better and he is probably a more complete player.   But the difference between Posey and the guys you mentioned AND House and Mason is bigger.

You tried to suggest if Posey signs, there would be no House.  With the non bird rights piece, that's likely not true unless Danny passes. 

The reason I'm done with the discussino is because we're going to have Corey, and that'll be the end of it.

If that happens, both of us will be happy. 

If it doesn't, I'd view Barnes and Jones as p--- poor replacements to Posey AND Mason doesn't make up the difference.

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #114 on: July 04, 2008, 07:17:25 PM »

Offline EJPLAYA

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3816
  • Tommy Points: 127
Quote
As far as that being all I have, I gave you names of other guys that I think are better than TA out there. All of them are options. Just because you don't like them as options doesn't mean they aren't valid, or that your assessment of them is accurate. I do know what I see in TA though and that is absolute garbage. He's not even that solid of a defender anymore. I hope he recovers from his injury and gets that part of his game back, because if he doesn't he won't be in this league very long.


The main problem is not wether I like them or not, the problem is wether they can be had or not. I highly doubt it.

As far as me not liking them and you liking them is a non-issue to me. If you feel comfortable with them fine, I don't even want to argue that. I think TA brings more to the table than some of them. But the real question is can they be had. I think not.

We get Posey for 3.2 million and House at whatever, and suddenly we start believing people will come here to play for nothing? I don't see it.

Anyways, other than it would be quite difficult to have any of them... they don't fit the role I want TA playing. I also only suggested TA in the case that all we get is Posey and House. Time and time again I've said that TA's replacement should be a decent sized SG that can play some point or a big PG that can guard SG. This role may very well be fulfilled by Pruitt, but I don't want to rely on him. This will give us versatility in our units both offensively and defensively, plus give us decent depth.
I think we are close in our goals, as I hope we sign Posey and House and none of this even matters. However, if you look at the topic we are in, we are discussing what we can do if Posey or Magette both go to other places. The this becomes crucial. TA shouldn't even come into play here because he doesn't fill Poey or House's shoes as he is not a legitimate PG because he is a turnover crazed player at the point. He doesn't play SF so he isn't going to give you Posey's ability to guard bigger players like Lebron. He can't really play the 2 due to the fact that he can't shoot a lick. I still can't seem to understand this infatuation with a 2 guard who can't dribble or shoot and at best is currently a decent defender. He is so limited that you could almost sign ANYONE and they would be as valuable as he is. Replacing TA is not the discussion. YOU could probably replace the guy...

In a perfect world we sign Posey and House. Giddens or Pruitt are able to step up and fill TA's limited need role. We get one more scrub type PG who could bring the ball up under pressure and a big man who is big enough to bang with the big centers to backup Perk. That all hinges on Posey signing though. This is the only reason that I am able to comprehend overpaying the guy. Just not a 5 year contract. Overpay for 3-4, not 5.

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #115 on: July 04, 2008, 07:47:32 PM »

Offline TripleOT

  • Chat Moderator
  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1993
  • Tommy Points: 213
In the grand scheme of things, does it really matter that much whether the Cs are overpaying Posey by $2m four and five years from now? All I know is that the Cs are the favorites to repeat with Posey in 2009. 

Considering how much dead weight salary is on most NBA rosters, what's a couple million next decade?  Seriously, everyone here is a capologist all of a sudden.  The Cs overpaid Scal by $2m in 2008. Did that preclude them from being successful? 

Teams that make mistakes on eight figure contracts are screwed.  Every single team can handle one horrible MLE signing. Posey's fourth and fifth year would merely be horrible in that he's being paid 40% too much, assuming he loses a few steps. 

Then again, Bruce Bowen was 36 this season, the age Pose will be at the end of a new five year deal, and I don't hear anyone crying about him being overpaid. He made a bit more than $4m this past year, and is on the books for two more years at $4m a year, at ages 37 and 38. So Posey will be getting a bit of a bump up from that, but he's only 31, and the salary cap will also be bumped up some when he gets to year four and five.       

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #116 on: July 04, 2008, 07:54:48 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Quote
As far as that being all I have, I gave you names of other guys that I think are better than TA out there. All of them are options. Just because you don't like them as options doesn't mean they aren't valid, or that your assessment of them is accurate. I do know what I see in TA though and that is absolute garbage. He's not even that solid of a defender anymore. I hope he recovers from his injury and gets that part of his game back, because if he doesn't he won't be in this league very long.


The main problem is not wether I like them or not, the problem is wether they can be had or not. I highly doubt it.

As far as me not liking them and you liking them is a non-issue to me. If you feel comfortable with them fine, I don't even want to argue that. I think TA brings more to the table than some of them. But the real question is can they be had. I think not.

We get Posey for 3.2 million and House at whatever, and suddenly we start believing people will come here to play for nothing? I don't see it.

Anyways, other than it would be quite difficult to have any of them... they don't fit the role I want TA playing. I also only suggested TA in the case that all we get is Posey and House. Time and time again I've said that TA's replacement should be a decent sized SG that can play some point or a big PG that can guard SG. This role may very well be fulfilled by Pruitt, but I don't want to rely on him. This will give us versatility in our units both offensively and defensively, plus give us decent depth.
I think we are close in our goals, as I hope we sign Posey and House and none of this even matters. However, if you look at the topic we are in, we are discussing what we can do if Posey or Magette both go to other places. The this becomes crucial. TA shouldn't even come into play here because he doesn't fill Poey or House's shoes as he is not a legitimate PG because he is a turnover crazed player at the point. He doesn't play SF so he isn't going to give you Posey's ability to guard bigger players like Lebron. He can't really play the 2 due to the fact that he can't shoot a lick. I still can't seem to understand this infatuation with a 2 guard who can't dribble or shoot and at best is currently a decent defender. He is so limited that you could almost sign ANYONE and they would be as valuable as he is. Replacing TA is not the discussion. YOU could probably replace the guy...

In a perfect world we sign Posey and House. Giddens or Pruitt are able to step up and fill TA's limited need role. We get one more scrub type PG who could bring the ball up under pressure and a big man who is big enough to bang with the big centers to backup Perk. That all hinges on Posey signing though. This is the only reason that I am able to comprehend overpaying the guy. Just not a 5 year contract. Overpay for 3-4, not 5.

I know fully well what topic we're in, but as always sub-topics arise inside threads and discussions go astray...

Here's the goal I want from the bench in addition to whatever House brings. If you think Pruitt is the man, then we're on. Even if Pruitt is the man, I still feel TA can be added for depth, but let's forget that for now... focus on these things I want our bench, our guards, to able to do:

1) Capable ballhandler (Pruitt should be fully capable)
2) Capable of defending big guards that like to post up (House can't do it, Pruitt?, here's where I like Allen if Pruitt is not what we expect)
3) A highly energetic and athletic small ball unit that can play defense that includes Rondo and Garnett (I can envision a Rondo-TA-Giddens-Posey-Garnett combination being quite successful). Maybe Pruitt can play the TA role, who knows? Is he more capable defensively? Does he go stronger to the basket than TA? Does his shot make up for it? Does he rebound better? I don't know.
4) Depth. For the PG position (TA is not what you want in a PG, but if injuries come by... that he's capable of playing it should be useful, as bad as he is...)

Those are my goals, and what I'd want to see. Other than Pruitt being an X Factor, can Kareem Rush help in establishing any of those? All of them? Who else can we bring instead of TA to do it?

I think your judgement of Tony being complete garbage is highly inaccurate, but whatever. Let's not focus on that.


I haven't overrated Roger Mason offensively one bit. He's a poorer shooter than House, but the fact that he can attack the basket and create for himself makes him a better offensive player than House. House is great as a spot up shooter, that's it... it's not hard to have a better offensive player than him.

Depends on what you are looking for in this offense system.   House creates spacing and is rarely not on the floor with Pierce who plays the distribution role. Mason can create his own shot, but he's not much of a distributor.  Personally, I don't believe that a guy with a below average shot who can create one provides as much value as you.

Offensively, I see House as more useful in general.  Defensively, I agreed that Mason was better and he is probably a more complete player.   But the difference between Posey and the guys you mentioned AND House and Mason is bigger.

You tried to suggest if Posey signs, there would be no House.  With the non bird rights piece, that's likely not true unless Danny passes. 

The reason I'm done with the discussino is because we're going to have Corey, and that'll be the end of it.

If that happens, both of us will be happy. 

If it doesn't, I'd view Barnes and Jones as **** poor replacements to Posey AND Mason doesn't make up the difference.

It's fine that we disagree. As I've said, even though I think Posey is not worth the full MLE, I'm fine with giving it to him. I just hope that Danny is not blindly giving it to him just to keep him... that he's exploring all the options that are out there. If he concludes that the best way to improve our team is to give him the full MLE, then that's the way it'll be. But I see a lot of validity in looking at other options, who are younger and quite capable of having a good role in this team.

And as I've said before, that was just a quick sample of some combinations that I think can be better than a Posey + min. vet. guy.  Who knows what Danny could get out of the MLE... maybe he can come up with a decent wing, pg, and center out of it. Who knows.

Offline acieEarl

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1087
  • Tommy Points: 47
I guess I'm in the minority, because I'd be all for it. I don't hold Ricky responsible for the crummy teams he's been on, because that's what they were; bad teams.

A good sign your team stinks: Ricky Davis is your second best player. Hello 05-06 C's. 06-07 Wolves, and this years Heat.

He wouldn't be asked to average 20 a game, and would be useful on a second unit where the backup point( House, I'm guessing)really isn't a playmaker. I know he has his warts, but I just feel like people tend to dwell on the negative with him more so than others.

I'd word it more like "Having Ricky Davis is a good sign that your team is going to stink" and "he has warts that hes spreads to the rest of the team"

Not a concidence that every team he's been on has been terrible.

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #118 on: July 04, 2008, 08:35:02 PM »

Offline timepiece33

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1747
  • Tommy Points: 78
It's fine that we disagree. As I've said, even though I think Posey is not worth the full MLE, I'm fine with giving it to him. I just hope that Danny is not blindly giving it to him just to keep him... that he's exploring all the options that are out there. If he concludes that the best way to improve our team is to give him the full MLE, then that's the way it'll be. But I see a lot of validity in looking at other options, who are younger and quite capable of having a good role in this team.

And as I've said before, that was just a quick sample of some combinations that I think can be better than a Posey + min. vet. guy.  Who knows what Danny could get out of the MLE... maybe he can come up with a decent wing, pg, and center out of it. Who knows.

We are all Celtics fans.  We all want the team to improve.  I disagreed with the sample and don't buy that there are many combinations better if you split it, but we'll see. 

I trust Danny. 

Re: What if we lose out on Maggette and Posey? Ricky Davis?
« Reply #119 on: July 04, 2008, 09:07:46 PM »

Offline RockinRyA

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5572
  • Tommy Points: 699
if we dont get posey fine. lets move on. if we can get maggette lets get him. but id want house too, and TA as defensive insurance. house's value would increase with maggette on board.

i dunno if we can get this scenario but this is what i wanted. if posey would sign for mle,3 years then ok. but if not, well theres this for me

PS:no ricky d pls!