win- In response to my post about sam not getting time with the starters, you decided to qoute MPG going up for the bench, which in fact, if anything, proved my point that doc played him with the bench to much.
You also didn't adresses my 2 points in a subsequent post about sam being hurt by not playing with the starters, though bud adressed one for you since then.
bud- no, i don't see the contridiction, becuse what your saying is false. outside of those 2 games, most of the time Sam has been on the floor it's been with KG and ray, and sometimes pierce as well. Just because he played with the bench in games 1 and 2 doesn't make something a contridiction. while i do agree that his game doesn't suit our style, who was running him out there until game 6?
you can't have it both ways, if sam's sturggles have nothing at all to do with doc, as you both claim, that doesn't make doc immune to critics pointing out that he stuck with him for 3 pivital games, and completly changed his role from the end of the season to game 1 of the playoffs. keeping players in when they aren't preforming is a coaching decision too.
what i find suprising in all these posts is the idea that doc needs to be above critiscm for cassell. thats uterly false. what is true however, is that doc should be givin credit for realizing that he was wrong, and going back to eddie. Thats a good coaching decision.
But, for the most part, the critisms of doc have been warnted, that doesn't mean there 100% right, but to act like there personal unwarrented attacks at doc? I don't see it, and as i said, im pretty even keel on doc i'd like to think, i praise him when he makes good calls (i think he's doing a good job since game 5, even in game 6 i felt like he made the right calls, we just didnt hit shots.) but i also call things like i see them with doc, and he's made several mistakes with regards to sam and eddie.