right programmed to foul hard in the playoffs. what does that prove, everyone agrees it was a hard foul...
your contention is that it was a hard foul specificly aimed to seriously injure david wests back.
and how did KG "do it any diffrent" exactly? he set a hard pick on a guy who didnt see it coming. same exact thing.
he didn't lower his shoulder and lean in the way that Horry did. and he didn't hit a guy right in the spot where he had a known injury.
the other difference is that KG was laying out a guy that had been giving us hard fouls the whole series.
Horry injured a guy that torched them in game 5...
lol kg certainly did lower his shoulder into Zaza, dead center. he leaned all the way in.
and again, your arguing semantics. its ok with you because KG is our guy and zaza ticked you off by giving hard fouls. Thats not a great argument. its along the lines of "well, yea i stole the food, but it was diffrent than when he did it. I had a reason."
Were never going to agree on this one. you see this as a dirty team specificly targeting a guy like some version of the karate kid. I see it like Who does, as a hard playoff foul.
And to whoever said the diffrence is that the spurs are precived as dirty, check out a message board about us or the pistons. We don't see our defense as dirty because it's ours, other teams hate james posey, who i love, as much as we hate bruce bowen.
its all in where your standing on these kinds of things. 
you really don't see the difference in giving a guy a hard foul who has been hammering your team with hard fouls and giving a guy a hard foul because he scored a ton of points on your team?
you really don't think there is a difference between those two scenarios?
you can chalk this up to coincidence if you want to, but there was an entire stadium of people that celebrated knowing exactly what Horry had done for his team.
you acknowledge that Horry is intentionally giving hard fouls in the playoffs (he admitted as much) and now you want us to believe he had no idea who he was fouling and that he was not aware that the guy already had a bad back....
this guy has been around the block. he has already done it before and he is on a team that is known for doing this.
my biggest problem with this, like i said earlier, is not that i don't like old school basketball, but that it is not old school basketball if you don't have to be afraid of retribution.
and the Spurs don't. they know that the Hornets won't put in one of their end of the bench players to go out and slam Parker because it would lead to a whole bunch of suspensions etc...
what happened is not really old school ball because if it were, Tony Parker would be waiting for the payback and Horry would not be doing it in the first place because the payback is usually worse than the initial hit...