Listening to the talk about the cap under the new CBA was intriguing. I wonder, has the NBA backed itself into a corner. What are teams like SAS, OKC, PHI, and others going to do when these max contracts hit.
It is what Adam Silver wanted. He did not want another Golden State, and no team has even won its conference in consecutive years since 2018-2019. The Celtics and Heat are the only two teams to have been to multiple finals in the last 7 seasons. I do not think he feels he has backed anything into a corner. Everything is right where he wants it to be. OKC is way over the second apron this year, and is going to have lose a lot of players next summer, if they do not get rid of them sooner. This is even after they dumped two rotation players this offseason. Next year they are losing one of Williams or Holmgren, or else they are getting rid of/letting walk several other players (likely including all of Dort, Caruso, and Cason Wallace).
Everyone's happy except for the players.
It's like the old Devo song - freedom from choice is what you want, freedom of choice is what you got. People think they want parity, but they don't like how parity looks now that it's here.
The problem is that the situation the governors are trying to avoid: Durant-to-the-Warriors, James-to-the-Heat, &c. makes it very difficult to avoid 'breaking up the band'.
I think the long-term goal is to create pressure on players to take less money to keep the band together, rather than on ownership to pay more to do so.
I am not sure I agree with that, if only because you'll never really see a situation again where enough of the needle-moving players are going to take less in a meaningful way (i.e. the top 5 free agents/extendable players all leave tens if not hundreds of millions on the table in order to compete) - you'd have to go back to the Heatles to see that, and Miami didn't have to deal with the same punitive structures of the aprons and the luxury tax to build around their three stars - and the 2011 CBA made it harder, with the most recent CBA going
harder in that direction.
The players keep getting taken to the cleaners in CBA negotiations, but I don't think the owners are using the current cap structure to actively pay top players less (even though this is obviously a mgmt goal every time they go to negotiations), just to keep one team from paying them max contracts.