Author Topic: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans  (Read 3940 times)

Silas, DefenseWinsChamps and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #45 on: Today at 12:59:13 PM »

Online Vermont Green

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15065
  • Tommy Points: 1110
I don't understand what Derik Queen has shown to make Zion expendable.
it's called "cheap, cost-controlled talent".

What has Zion shown to make him not expendable?  He has been on a downward trajectory since 2021, up until last season where he was a solid starter for 62 games with < 30 min per game.  I have asked this before but what ceiling are you placing on Zion for the next say 5 seasons?  Can he be as good as Julius Randle but with fewer games expected?

The logical trade here is Zion + Murphy for Brown + Hauser.   Do you do that?  Would you expect draft picks from NOP?

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #46 on: Today at 01:08:40 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 54639
  • Tommy Points: 2616
I don't understand what Derik Queen has shown to make Zion expendable.
it's called "cheap, cost-controlled talent".

What has Zion shown to make him not expendable?  He has been on a downward trajectory since 2021, up until last season where he was a solid starter for 62 games with < 30 min per game.  I have asked this before but what ceiling are you placing on Zion for the next say 5 seasons?  Can he be as good as Julius Randle but with fewer games expected?

The logical trade here is Zion + Murphy for Brown + Hauser.   Do you do that?  Would you expect draft picks from NOP?

I thought he deserved to be made expendable last summer. I am surprised they still view him that way. I thought losing 50lbs & getting into the best shape of his career would buy Zion some grace. Zion seemed to buy into everything Joe Dumars wanted him to be about. Yet ...

Maybe Zion wasn't as a professional / wasn't as bought in as we were told he was.

Zion is such a high upside player. That was a big step he took last year to show he cares / wants to be more professional / wants to win. I thought it would get him more buy-in from the front office. It hasn't. That is strange to me.

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #47 on: Today at 01:16:24 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 54639
  • Tommy Points: 2616
Derik Queen

529 of his 748 FGAs came within 10 feet.
That is about 71% of his overall FG attempts.

26-72 FGA on 10-15 footers. 36.1% FG.
22-59 FGA on 16-23 footers. 37.3% FG.
23-88 FGA on three pointers. 26.1% FG 39.2% eFG.

So about a 70/30 split on inside shots vs jumpers outside of 10 feet. And he 71-219 on those jump shots for an eFG of 37.6%.

----------

I expected him to have taken more jump-shots. More of a 60-40 split or even a 50-50 split. Not great. Undersized big. Middling athleticism. He is going to have more jump-shots if he wants to be a prolific scorer in this league.

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #48 on: Today at 01:19:29 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 54639
  • Tommy Points: 2616
On Zion & the Celtics,

This talk about Zion not being a great fit with D Queen because of their combined lack of shooting. I was thinking Queen is a much better shooter and more skilled big man than Queta. I don't think Queta will work with Zion. I have never liked Zion with a rim runner at center. I have always wanted him to have a stretch 5 like Giannis had with B Lopez.

I think BOS would have to go after Myles Turner to pair with Zion if BOS did trade for Zion. Might have to move on from Queta too. Queta would get a decent trade return. A starting caliber wing or guard.

Same issue with Nic Claxton. Not a good enough shooter to pair with Zion. With Naz Reid, both Naz & Zion have limitations as defenders / rebounders. I don't think they would be a good pairing.

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #49 on: Today at 01:54:41 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20529
  • Tommy Points: 1355
Quote
We can probably get Myles Turner for the TPE straight up if MIL start rebuilding after trading Giannis. Without sending them any picks. Why would they want to keep him? Better to free up cap space. I don't think there is much of a market for him. Not much competition to drive up the price.

Myles is a weak rebounder for his size.

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #50 on: Today at 02:30:48 PM »

Online jambr380

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14071
  • Tommy Points: 2103
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Quote
NBA insider Brandon 'Scoop B.' Robinson confirmed Fischer's report of the Pelicans' interest in Brown and said the framework of a potential deal to get him to New Orleans is guard Dejounte Murray, wing Trey Murphy III and "significant draft capital."

Brown for Murray and Murphy plus draft capital does not interest me all that much, to be honest, plus it adds $2.7M in salary.  If you could then flip some of the draft capital and use the $27M TPE (which you would not have to use for this trade or you could generate a new one) to trade for a starting center, then the team could look pretty good I guess.  This center would have to fit the $27M TPE, that does not buy much of a center these days (Myles Turner, Naz Reid, Nic Claxton).

White
Murray
Murphy
Tatum
Turner, Reid, or Claxton?

And still no speedy PG that so many are looking to add.  I am not sold on this.

Dejounte Murray is a speedy PG. Strong defender.

D White will be the two guard.

-------------

I wouldn't want Naz Reid as a starting center. He is a weak defender. Cannot anchor a defense. He is either a PF or a 6th man. I don't think he can start at C. Too many air-head type moments on off-ball defense.

We can probably get Myles Turner for the TPE straight up if MIL start rebuilding after trading Giannis. Without sending them any picks. Why would they want to keep him? Better to free up cap space. I don't think there is much of a market for him. Not much competition to drive up the price.

It would take draft picks to get Nic Claxton. Probably 2 firsts.

----------------

Agreed. Not sold on it either. If I am going to trade Jaylen and break up the Tatum / Jaylen duo, I need a sure thing. Those 2 have had too much success together to break them up for anything less.

So I wouldn't do a Zion for Jaylen trade either. Too much of a question mark health wise.
Murray was a speedy PG before going to Atlanta and didn't look nearly as promising as he did in SA.  He seems slower and less effective as a result of those injuries.  Taking on Murray is similar to taking on Zion --> hoping an injured player is able to bounce back to their best form when it's not terribly likely.  taking them is more of a benefit to NO to clear their books of problematic contracts.  would require significant draft capital coming to the C's and NOP only has their own first rounders to deal which won't be great picks once they have Jaylen

I definitely don't think the bolded part is true. Jaylen on the Pelicans should place them firmly in that 4-10 draft range where we would actually have the best chance of landing a high draft pick. Jaylen had a really good year this year, but removing Trey Murphy plus one of Murray/Zion and substituting Jaylen isn't going to suddenly make them a playoff team. They still have a long way to go.

I'm not excited about any Jaylen/NOP trade without multiple 1sts, though - seems like it has the chance to not work out in our favor.

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #51 on: Today at 03:02:17 PM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34044
  • Tommy Points: 10354
Quote
NBA insider Brandon 'Scoop B.' Robinson confirmed Fischer's report of the Pelicans' interest in Brown and said the framework of a potential deal to get him to New Orleans is guard Dejounte Murray, wing Trey Murphy III and "significant draft capital."

Brown for Murray and Murphy plus draft capital does not interest me all that much, to be honest, plus it adds $2.7M in salary.  If you could then flip some of the draft capital and use the $27M TPE (which you would not have to use for this trade or you could generate a new one) to trade for a starting center, then the team could look pretty good I guess.  This center would have to fit the $27M TPE, that does not buy much of a center these days (Myles Turner, Naz Reid, Nic Claxton).

White
Murray
Murphy
Tatum
Turner, Reid, or Claxton?

And still no speedy PG that so many are looking to add.  I am not sold on this.

Dejounte Murray is a speedy PG. Strong defender.

D White will be the two guard.

-------------

I wouldn't want Naz Reid as a starting center. He is a weak defender. Cannot anchor a defense. He is either a PF or a 6th man. I don't think he can start at C. Too many air-head type moments on off-ball defense.

We can probably get Myles Turner for the TPE straight up if MIL start rebuilding after trading Giannis. Without sending them any picks. Why would they want to keep him? Better to free up cap space. I don't think there is much of a market for him. Not much competition to drive up the price.

It would take draft picks to get Nic Claxton. Probably 2 firsts.

----------------

Agreed. Not sold on it either. If I am going to trade Jaylen and break up the Tatum / Jaylen duo, I need a sure thing. Those 2 have had too much success together to break them up for anything less.

So I wouldn't do a Zion for Jaylen trade either. Too much of a question mark health wise.
Murray was a speedy PG before going to Atlanta and didn't look nearly as promising as he did in SA.  He seems slower and less effective as a result of those injuries.  Taking on Murray is similar to taking on Zion --> hoping an injured player is able to bounce back to their best form when it's not terribly likely.  taking them is more of a benefit to NO to clear their books of problematic contracts.  would require significant draft capital coming to the C's and NOP only has their own first rounders to deal which won't be great picks once they have Jaylen

I definitely don't think the bolded part is true. Jaylen on the Pelicans should place them firmly in that 4-10 draft range where we would actually have the best chance of landing a high draft pick. Jaylen had a really good year this year, but removing Trey Murphy plus one of Murray/Zion and substituting Jaylen isn't going to suddenly make them a playoff team. They still have a long way to go.

I'm not excited about any Jaylen/NOP trade without multiple 1sts, though - seems like it has the chance to not work out in our favor.
that's what I thought would happen this year (maybe not quite that low but definitely lottery team) and JB proved me wrong.  add him to either Zion/Murray, Queen, Fears, Missi, Bey  and Poole and that's not a whole lot different from what he had to work with on the C's this year with the exception of getting a top player returning at the end of the season.

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #52 on: Today at 03:07:36 PM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34044
  • Tommy Points: 10354
I don't understand what Derik Queen has shown to make Zion expendable.
it's called "cheap, cost-controlled talent".

What has Zion shown to make him not expendable?  He has been on a downward trajectory since 2021, up until last season where he was a solid starter for 62 games with < 30 min per game.  I have asked this before but what ceiling are you placing on Zion for the next say 5 seasons?  Can he be as good as Julius Randle but with fewer games expected?

The logical trade here is Zion + Murphy for Brown + Hauser.   Do you do that?  Would you expect draft picks from NOP?
I'd expect 2-3 first rounders from NO at a minimum.  I wouldn't do the trade because we're giving up the best player and even though Zion can be a real force when he plays, the problem is the infrequency with which he plays. 

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #53 on: Today at 03:48:27 PM »

Offline slightly biased bias fan

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1669
  • Tommy Points: 337
In this hypothetical scenario, the Celtics would have the ability to rest Zion because they could move every player up in position, and not struggle offensively.

Prichard
White
Murphy III
Tatum
Porzingis/Queta

The theory would also be that having the right mentors around Zion and playing far away from negative influences, would turn his career around. The biggest issue for me would be finding out the level of damage he has done to his body as a result of his physical negligence.

Having the tandem of Zion Williamson and Trey Murphy III to replace Brown would offer alternative options that the Celtics have been lacking last season, elite shooting (Murphy III) and rim presence (Williamson). I also like the idea of offensive hierarchy.


Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #54 on: Today at 03:58:27 PM »

Offline slightly biased bias fan

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1669
  • Tommy Points: 337
For New Orleans, I love the balance Brown would bring to their starting five and their 10 men units would be solid.

Fears
Murray
Brown
Jones
Queen

Poole
Hawkins
Bey
Hauser
Missi

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #55 on: Today at 04:49:10 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15318
  • Tommy Points: 1819
In this hypothetical scenario, the Celtics would have the ability to rest Zion because they could move every player up in position, and not struggle offensively.

Prichard
White
Murphy III
Tatum
Porzingis/Queta

The theory would also be that having the right mentors around Zion and playing far away from negative influences, would turn his career around. The biggest issue for me would be finding out the level of damage he has done to his body as a result of his physical negligence.

Having the tandem of Zion Williamson and Trey Murphy III to replace Brown would offer alternative options that the Celtics have been lacking last season, elite shooting (Murphy III) and rim presence (Williamson). I also like the idea of offensive hierarchy.

I agree on the bolded. Zion is still young at 25, so I am not concerned about injuries that he had back in 2019 and 2021. He also played in 35 consecutive games this season which he had never done before. With the significant weight loss, I expect him to continue trending in the right direction.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #56 on: Today at 04:55:40 PM »

Online DrJasper

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 276
  • Tommy Points: 71
I dont know? but I feel like I would rather keep Jaylen actually! He is a ECF mvp, finals mvp etc and didnt just have a major injury. Additionally we could get even more for Tatum right?

Tatum and Hauser for Trey Murphy and Zion Williamson plus picks.
Then get Myles Turner with our trade exception for some picks.

I just looked at the games Zion had against the spurs, he flat out won the matchup with the best player in the league and didnt look scared at all driving to the rim against him.
I feel if he gets even healthier in Boston he could be Charles Barkley. He plays for the worst franchise in the nba, maybe its a buy low opportunity?

Trey Murphy would be a great replacement for Tatum in some aspects, especially on defense and as a spacer and shot creator.

White - Brown - Murphy - Zion - Turner
+ Pritchard, Queta, Hugo, Walsh, Scheiermann and Harper Jr. of the bench sounds like the best team in the east when healthy of course.
Memphis Grizzlies
PG: Dragic, Ball, Carter
SG: Temple, KCP, Holiday, Washburn
SF: Richardson, Anderson, Parsons, Casspi
PF: Jackson jr, Beasley, Watanabe
C: Adebayo, Green, Noah
https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/teams/Memphis-Grizzlies/14/Rosters/Regular/2019  +21 Lal 2nd

Re: Trade Idea: Celtics - Pelicans
« Reply #57 on: Today at 05:11:31 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15318
  • Tommy Points: 1819
I dont know? but I feel like I would rather keep Jaylen actually! He is a ECF mvp, finals mvp etc and didnt just have a major injury. Additionally we could get even more for Tatum right?

Tatum and Hauser for Trey Murphy and Zion Williamson plus picks.
Then get Myles Turner with our trade exception for some picks.

I just looked at the games Zion had against the spurs, he flat out won the matchup with the best player in the league and didnt look scared at all driving to the rim against him.
I feel if he gets even healthier in Boston he could be Charles Barkley. He plays for the worst franchise in the nba, maybe its a buy low opportunity?

Trey Murphy would be a great replacement for Tatum in some aspects, especially on defense and as a spacer and shot creator.

White - Brown - Murphy - Zion - Turner
+ Pritchard, Queta, Hugo, Walsh, Scheiermann and Harper Jr. of the bench sounds like the best team in the east when healthy of course.

I think Tatum will be himself next season. He looked really good when he came back averaging 22pts/10rebs/5ast. Tatum at 90% of what he was is still better than Jaylen Brown. JT made the NBA first team 4 times for a reason. Brown has not made it once. Also, I feel a lot better with Tatum having the ball in his hands. He does not turn the ball over like JB does.  I would not trade JT.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.