Windhorst is saying his focus is Miami and they are the frontrunners going into this week. Feels odd there's mixed reporting from even the reputable reporters around the league (Stein, Windhorst, Fischer, Amick, etc.). Would love to hear from Himmelsbach or some reliable Celtics reporters soon.
What makes them reputable? When is the last time any of them broke anything?
The only reliable reported is Shams in my opinion. When he says something happened, it most likely did. The rest of the guys are just paid promoters to attract clicks and eye balls.
I think the second best guy out there may be Chris Haynes, who is fairly reliable when he reports something as fact.
By reputable I just mean more the reporters who provide the actual reporting that trade talks are developing and such like that, not podcasters or people who debate like Bill Simmons, KOC, etc. Lowe used to be that guy but now with the Ringer I don't think he's really a reporter-type, more analysis and obviously he's on the show with Simmons.
Stein is legit too, yeah he doesn't really break actual transactions but his reporting and articles I like a lot. He's tapped in similar to Haynes IMO, Haynes also has the benefit of knowing some players and their camps really well including Tatum.
But yeah Shams is the gold standard but he'll only tweet about it when the trade officially happens.