Author Topic: Our bigs going forward  (Read 261040 times)

slamtheking, Vermont Green and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #270 on: July 11, 2025, 10:32:01 AM »

Online Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13628
  • Tommy Points: 1026
This is the first chance I had to watch highlights. He has some skills. I think they will translate to the NBA. I don?t know how you aren?t excited about this guy.

We are currently selling plots on Amari Williams island for reasonable amounts. Come and get your land before its sold out!

I think I'm the only living here so far.

I will put down a deposit for that, not a full commitment.  We are talking about a 2nd round pick so expectations have to be calibrated accordingly.  I am not getting my hopes up really high, I would be more than satisfied if he ended up somewhere in the range of Kornet/RWilliams.  That is all.  And based on the highlights, I see that as within reach.

Highlights distort things like shooting as highlights only show makes.  But for things like running the floor, seeing the floor, smooth hands, dribbling at full speed, length, the kind of "can't teach" things, what you see on the highlights is real.  I had no idea that Amari Williams had the kind of raw materials that he has.

The highlights showed him making (1) 3-point shot, and it was ugly.  Looked more like a shot put throw than a basketball shot.  He is a long way from developing anything close to NBA shooting touch.  But Kornet and Williams couldn't shoot either.  Both understood and accepted their roles and contributed.  I am optimistic that Amari can do the same.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #271 on: July 11, 2025, 10:38:26 AM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6759
  • Tommy Points: 812
This is the first chance I had to watch highlights. He has some skills. I think they will translate to the NBA. I don?t know how you aren?t excited about this guy.

We are currently selling plots on Amari Williams island for reasonable amounts. Come and get your land before its sold out!

I think I'm the only living here so far.

I will put down a deposit for that, not a full commitment.  We are talking about a 2nd round pick so expectations have to be calibrated accordingly.  I am not getting my hopes up really high, I would be more than satisfied if he ended up somewhere in the range of Kornet/RWilliams.  That is all.  And based on the highlights, I see that as within reach.

Highlights distort things like shooting as highlights only show makes.  But for things like running the floor, seeing the floor, smooth hands, dribbling at full speed, length, the kind of "can't teach" things, what you see on the highlights is real.  I had no idea that Amari Williams had the kind of raw materials that he has.

The highlights showed him making (1) 3-point shot, and it was ugly.  Looked more like a shot put throw than a basketball shot.  He is a long way from developing anything close to NBA shooting touch.  But Kornet and Williams couldn't shoot either.  Both understood and accepted their roles and contributed.  I am optimistic that Amari can do the same.

We do not do deposits, but I will sell you a timeshare on the island. You can come and enjoy it for a few weeks out of the year.

If you abandoned your reasonableness, I'd be willing to let you put a deposit down. But this island is not a place for reason.

:)

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #272 on: July 11, 2025, 10:44:03 AM »

Online Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13628
  • Tommy Points: 1026
This is the first chance I had to watch highlights. He has some skills. I think they will translate to the NBA. I don?t know how you aren?t excited about this guy.

We are currently selling plots on Amari Williams island for reasonable amounts. Come and get your land before its sold out!

I think I'm the only living here so far.

I will put down a deposit for that, not a full commitment.  We are talking about a 2nd round pick so expectations have to be calibrated accordingly.  I am not getting my hopes up really high, I would be more than satisfied if he ended up somewhere in the range of Kornet/RWilliams.  That is all.  And based on the highlights, I see that as within reach.

Highlights distort things like shooting as highlights only show makes.  But for things like running the floor, seeing the floor, smooth hands, dribbling at full speed, length, the kind of "can't teach" things, what you see on the highlights is real.  I had no idea that Amari Williams had the kind of raw materials that he has.

The highlights showed him making (1) 3-point shot, and it was ugly.  Looked more like a shot put throw than a basketball shot.  He is a long way from developing anything close to NBA shooting touch.  But Kornet and Williams couldn't shoot either.  Both understood and accepted their roles and contributed.  I am optimistic that Amari can do the same.

We do not do deposits, but I will sell you a timeshare on the island. You can come and enjoy it for a few weeks out of the year.

If you abandoned your reasonableness, I'd be willing to let you put a deposit down. But this island is not a place for reason.

:)

Very accommodating of you.  How about you let me see a couple of summer league games and then maybe I will be ready to make the full plunge.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #273 on: August 02, 2025, 10:42:14 AM »

Offline BringToughnessBack

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8702
  • Tommy Points: 1038
Could Walker Kessler be our target? We would need to give away 2 1st picks and Simons and one small contract. What does everyone think about him? We know Danny will get what he wants in a trade for sure. Taking our 2026 pick could be enticing knowing Tatum will be out.

https://sports.yahoo.com/article/celtics-trade-idea-pairs-jayson-182736068.html

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #274 on: August 02, 2025, 02:52:28 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13583
  • Tommy Points: 1711
Could Walker Kessler be our target? We would need to give away 2 1st picks and Simons and one small contract. What does everyone think about him? We know Danny will get what he wants in a trade for sure. Taking our 2026 pick could be enticing knowing Tatum will be out.

https://sports.yahoo.com/article/celtics-trade-idea-pairs-jayson-182736068.html

Why for the Jazz? Kessler is a stud. He?s in his early 20?s. Seems like a player that would be good to keep for their rebuild.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2025, 02:59:49 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #275 on: Yesterday at 11:00:54 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20107
  • Tommy Points: 1331
Why would Ainge trade him?   The answer would he would not save for a big haul.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #276 on: Yesterday at 12:04:28 PM »

Online boscel33

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2848
  • Tommy Points: 173
Why would Ainge trade him?   The answer would he would not save for a big haul.

https://www.slcdunk.com/the-downbeat-latest-jazz-news/2025/8/4/24475534/trade-block-nba-how-long-will-walker-kessler-be-with-the-utah-jazz

I think Ainge would and it wouldn't take a haul.  I think Simons might actually pull us back assets seeing as his stats are better than Kessler's, and it's really not close.  The have Kyle F already and Jusef to back him up.  Yeah, this might be a 1 for 1 like the Claxton thought or get us a pick or two.
"There's sharks and minnows in this world. If you don't know which you are, you ain't a shark."

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #277 on: Yesterday at 12:35:52 PM »

Online Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13628
  • Tommy Points: 1026
I am sure that the BOS front office would love to get Kessler but what does BOS have to trade?  Would something like Niang and 2 firsts (2026 and something in the future) do it?  People OK with giving up the 2026 First for Kessler?  Would this even be enough for UTA to be interested?

You have to factor in what BOS will have to pay Kessler as a FA.  There will be some room under the second apron in 2026.  They could offer him a very solid contract, something close to Porzingis money, and still probably manage the 2nd apron.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #278 on: Yesterday at 01:29:42 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13583
  • Tommy Points: 1711
Why would Ainge trade him?   The answer would he would not save for a big haul.

https://www.slcdunk.com/the-downbeat-latest-jazz-news/2025/8/4/24475534/trade-block-nba-how-long-will-walker-kessler-be-with-the-utah-jazz

I think Ainge would and it wouldn't take a haul.  I think Simons might actually pull us back assets seeing as his stats are better than Kessler's, and it's really not close.  The have Kyle F already and Jusef to back him up.  Yeah, this might be a 1 for 1 like the Claxton thought or get us a pick or two.

That doesn?t seem like a very reliable site. Nurkic is 30, so I don?t think he?s going to be a part of their rebuild. Flipowski would get killed playing Center. He?s a really poor defender.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #279 on: Yesterday at 01:53:38 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7949
  • Tommy Points: 1035
Why would Ainge trade him?   The answer would he would not save for a big haul.

https://www.slcdunk.com/the-downbeat-latest-jazz-news/2025/8/4/24475534/trade-block-nba-how-long-will-walker-kessler-be-with-the-utah-jazz

I think Ainge would and it wouldn't take a haul.  I think Simons might actually pull us back assets seeing as his stats are better than Kessler's, and it's really not close.  The have Kyle F already and Jusef to back him up.  Yeah, this might be a 1 for 1 like the Claxton thought or get us a pick or two.

That doesn?t seem like a very reliable site. Nurkic is 30, so I don?t think he?s going to be a part of their rebuild. Flipowski would get killed playing Center. He?s a really poor defender.

Utah is tanking one more year, their pick goes OKC if they pick outside the top 8, so I do not think they care if Filipowski gets killed at center for a season.  If, right before training camp, the Celtics are starting to feel more confident that Tatum will play this season, I might see if Utah is interested in our pick if it?s protected to convey if outside the top 6 to 8 range.  With Tatum missing likely 2/3 of the season at a minimum, our pick certainly has late lottery upside.  It would give the Celtics time to negotiate a rookie extension with Kessler before the end of camp deadline.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #280 on: Yesterday at 03:59:53 PM »

Online Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13628
  • Tommy Points: 1026
It is interesting to me that UTA traded Sexton and a 2nd to get Nurkic.  Sexton has a $18M expiring contract.  Nurkic is expiring also, but why did UTA do this trade if they are just going to tank anyway?  Why give up a 2nd round pick to rearrange your deck chairs?

It seems to me that they saw something in Nurkic that they liked.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #281 on: Yesterday at 09:24:41 PM »

Online JBcat

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3703
  • Tommy Points: 514
It is interesting to me that UTA traded Sexton and a 2nd to get Nurkic.  Sexton has a $18M expiring contract.  Nurkic is expiring also, but why did UTA do this trade if they are just going to tank anyway?  Why give up a 2nd round pick to rearrange your deck chairs?

It seems to me that they saw something in Nurkic that they liked.

It could be they just wanted to open up more playing time for their young guards/wings Bailey, Sensabaugh, George, Collier, and Clayton. But now they are a little crowded at center. Can Fillipowski play some PF?

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #282 on: Yesterday at 10:51:28 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13583
  • Tommy Points: 1711
Why would Ainge trade him?   The answer would he would not save for a big haul.

https://www.slcdunk.com/the-downbeat-latest-jazz-news/2025/8/4/24475534/trade-block-nba-how-long-will-walker-kessler-be-with-the-utah-jazz

I think Ainge would and it wouldn't take a haul.  I think Simons might actually pull us back assets seeing as his stats are better than Kessler's, and it's really not close.  The have Kyle F already and Jusef to back him up.  Yeah, this might be a 1 for 1 like the Claxton thought or get us a pick or two.

That doesn?t seem like a very reliable site. Nurkic is 30, so I don?t think he?s going to be a part of their rebuild. Flipowski would get killed playing Center. He?s a really poor defender.

Utah is tanking one more year, their pick goes OKC if they pick outside the top 8, so I do not think they care if Filipowski gets killed at center for a season.  If, right before training camp, the Celtics are starting to feel more confident that Tatum will play this season, I might see if Utah is interested in our pick if it?s protected to convey if outside the top 6 to 8 range.  With Tatum missing likely 2/3 of the season at a minimum, our pick certainly has late lottery upside.  It would give the Celtics time to negotiate a rookie extension with Kessler before the end of camp deadline.

Jazz won 17 games last year. I don?t think they are going to do that again. Utah will still be bad, but I don?t think they will be actively trying to lose games like they did last year. The team was literally playing their starters against the good teams and then benching them against bad teams. Believe the league fined them for doing so. 

If the Jazz do decide to throw next year, might as well trade Markannen. He?s going to be 30 by the time they are a .500 team.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #283 on: Today at 02:35:21 AM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7949
  • Tommy Points: 1035
Why would Ainge trade him?   The answer would he would not save for a big haul.

https://www.slcdunk.com/the-downbeat-latest-jazz-news/2025/8/4/24475534/trade-block-nba-how-long-will-walker-kessler-be-with-the-utah-jazz

I think Ainge would and it wouldn't take a haul.  I think Simons might actually pull us back assets seeing as his stats are better than Kessler's, and it's really not close.  The have Kyle F already and Jusef to back him up.  Yeah, this might be a 1 for 1 like the Claxton thought or get us a pick or two.

That doesn?t seem like a very reliable site. Nurkic is 30, so I don?t think he?s going to be a part of their rebuild. Flipowski would get killed playing Center. He?s a really poor defender.

Utah is tanking one more year, their pick goes OKC if they pick outside the top 8, so I do not think they care if Filipowski gets killed at center for a season.  If, right before training camp, the Celtics are starting to feel more confident that Tatum will play this season, I might see if Utah is interested in our pick if it?s protected to convey if outside the top 6 to 8 range.  With Tatum missing likely 2/3 of the season at a minimum, our pick certainly has late lottery upside.  It would give the Celtics time to negotiate a rookie extension with Kessler before the end of camp deadline.

Jazz won 17 games last year. I don?t think they are going to do that again. Utah will still be bad, but I don?t think they will be actively trying to lose games like they did last year. The team was literally playing their starters against the good teams and then benching them against bad teams. Believe the league fined them for doing so. 

If the Jazz do decide to throw next year, might as well trade Markannen. He?s going to be 30 by the time they are a .500 team.

For sure they will be.  They are a) going to make sure they don?t finish with anything better than the 5th-best record, and b) once you do that you may as well aim all the way for the bottom.  They want at least one more top 5 pick to go with Ace Bailey.  The only reason they haven?t released KJ Martin and his fully unguaranteed $8 million salary, for example, is that he gives them a little cushion to stay above the salary floor in the event they send out more salary in a trade they take on between now and the start of the year.

And Markannen is absolutely on the block.  Might not get traded this if they don?t get the offer they want, but the Jazz are trying to copy the Thunder and have not finished bottoming out.  Kessler, too, is keepable but not key.

Re: Our bigs going forward
« Reply #284 on: Today at 08:30:30 AM »

Online Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13628
  • Tommy Points: 1026
the Jazz are trying to copy the Thunder...

It is interesting that the last 5 champions, all got their best player in the draft, except OKC.  They got their best player via a trade, but he was the 11th pick.  BOS got Tatum and Brown at #3 picks.  Jokic was the 41st pick.  GSW got Curry at #7.  And MIL got Giannis at #15.

I guess my point is that copying OKC may not be as easy as it seems.  I am sure that UTA sees it as Ainge drafted the key players for a championship in BOS so he can do it again in UTA.  And maybe he can.  But a lot of teams fail at this approach.