Author Topic: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season  (Read 129944 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #195 on: March 09, 2024, 05:41:05 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16178
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Jeudy traded to Browns for a 5th and 6th round pick.

Broncos gonna tank next season or are they building capital to try something on draft day?

They’d better tank with that dead cap space.  It’s not like they can win if they want to.

A tank season for the Pats sounds good to me. Draft and sign thinking a couple years ahead. Another top 5 pick next year combined with a trade down to net a 1st/2nd in 2025 sounds good  to me.

I want the Patriots to become the OKC Thunder of the NFL for the next 3 years. Accumulate as many valuable assets as possible. If that means trading out of this draft, so be it.

I think people will blow a gasket if Pats go all-in on losing and accumulating assets. But I’m very much in agreement with you.
They should have done it immediately after Tom left. They are 4 years behind schedule.

Are you oddly pretending they didn’t tank last year when they have the third pick in the draft?

I mean you can get into semantics about what their intent was but the end result was they had a tanking year. They also had too much talent the year after Brady left to just cut and trade everyone. You could quibble they should they should have done something differently the year before last but you were urging them to do the opposite and sign guys like Hopkins.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2024, 05:50:20 PM by celticsclay »

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #196 on: March 09, 2024, 06:30:42 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34678
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Jeudy traded to Browns for a 5th and 6th round pick.

Broncos gonna tank next season or are they building capital to try something on draft day?

They’d better tank with that dead cap space.  It’s not like they can win if they want to.

A tank season for the Pats sounds good to me. Draft and sign thinking a couple years ahead. Another top 5 pick next year combined with a trade down to net a 1st/2nd in 2025 sounds good  to me.

I want the Patriots to become the OKC Thunder of the NFL for the next 3 years. Accumulate as many valuable assets as possible. If that means trading out of this draft, so be it.

I think people will blow a gasket if Pats go all-in on losing and accumulating assets. But I’m very much in agreement with you.
They should have done it immediately after Tom left. They are 4 years behind schedule.

Are you oddly pretending they didn’t tank last year when they have the third pick in the draft?

I mean you can get into semantics about what their intent was but the end result was they had a tanking year. They also had too much talent the year after Brady left to just cut and trade everyone. You could quibble they should they should have done something differently the year before last but you were urging them to do the opposite and sign guys like Hopkins.
They definitely didn't tank, but yes they were bad so it is probably a bit of semantics, but them not intending to tank and then being bad led to a lot of the dysfunction that is being reported.  They also should have gotten a new coach and gm better positioned to tank and pull out of it.  Bill wanting to win did not help a tank at all. 
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #197 on: March 09, 2024, 08:03:42 PM »

Offline green_bballers13

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 336
Jeudy traded to Browns for a 5th and 6th round pick.

Broncos gonna tank next season or are they building capital to try something on draft day?

They’d better tank with that dead cap space.  It’s not like they can win if they want to.

A tank season for the Pats sounds good to me. Draft and sign thinking a couple years ahead. Another top 5 pick next year combined with a trade down to net a 1st/2nd in 2025 sounds good  to me.

I want the Patriots to become the OKC Thunder of the NFL for the next 3 years. Accumulate as many valuable assets as possible. If that means trading out of this draft, so be it.

I think people will blow a gasket if Pats go all-in on losing and accumulating assets. But I’m very much in agreement with you.
They should have done it immediately after Tom left. They are 4 years behind schedule.

Are you oddly pretending they didn’t tank last year when they have the third pick in the draft?

I mean you can get into semantics about what their intent was but the end result was they had a tanking year. They also had too much talent the year after Brady left to just cut and trade everyone. You could quibble they should they should have done something differently the year before last but you were urging them to do the opposite and sign guys like Hopkins.
They definitely didn't tank, but yes they were bad so it is probably a bit of semantics, but them not intending to tank and then being bad led to a lot of the dysfunction that is being reported.  They also should have gotten a new coach and gm better positioned to tank and pull out of it.  Bill wanting to win did not help a tank at all.

Losing led to dysfunction. Players and coaches don't tank in the NFL if they want to last long. Belichick was trying to win.
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #198 on: March 09, 2024, 08:23:11 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25577
  • Tommy Points: 2721
Jeudy traded to Browns for a 5th and 6th round pick.

Broncos gonna tank next season or are they building capital to try something on draft day?

They’d better tank with that dead cap space.  It’s not like they can win if they want to.

A tank season for the Pats sounds good to me. Draft and sign thinking a couple years ahead. Another top 5 pick next year combined with a trade down to net a 1st/2nd in 2025 sounds good  to me.

I want the Patriots to become the OKC Thunder of the NFL for the next 3 years. Accumulate as many valuable assets as possible. If that means trading out of this draft, so be it.

I think people will blow a gasket if Pats go all-in on losing and accumulating assets. But I’m very much in agreement with you.
They should have done it immediately after Tom left. They are 4 years behind schedule.

Are you oddly pretending they didn’t tank last year when they have the third pick in the draft?

I mean you can get into semantics about what their intent was but the end result was they had a tanking year. They also had too much talent the year after Brady left to just cut and trade everyone. You could quibble they should they should have done something differently the year before last but you were urging them to do the opposite and sign guys like Hopkins.
They definitely didn't tank, but yes they were bad so it is probably a bit of semantics, but them not intending to tank and then being bad led to a lot of the dysfunction that is being reported.  They also should have gotten a new coach and gm better positioned to tank and pull out of it.  Bill wanting to win did not help a tank at all.

Losing led to dysfunction. Players and coaches don't tank in the NFL if they want to last long. Belichick was trying to win.

You don’t play to lose ever of course. But you can only do so much without talent.  The losing is maddening to fans.  But I’d be on board for another round of losing if 2025 brings some serious draft capital. Chicago made out absurdly well.

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #199 on: March 09, 2024, 10:28:34 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34678
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Jeudy traded to Browns for a 5th and 6th round pick.

Broncos gonna tank next season or are they building capital to try something on draft day?

They’d better tank with that dead cap space.  It’s not like they can win if they want to.

A tank season for the Pats sounds good to me. Draft and sign thinking a couple years ahead. Another top 5 pick next year combined with a trade down to net a 1st/2nd in 2025 sounds good  to me.

I want the Patriots to become the OKC Thunder of the NFL for the next 3 years. Accumulate as many valuable assets as possible. If that means trading out of this draft, so be it.

I think people will blow a gasket if Pats go all-in on losing and accumulating assets. But I’m very much in agreement with you.
They should have done it immediately after Tom left. They are 4 years behind schedule.

Are you oddly pretending they didn’t tank last year when they have the third pick in the draft?

I mean you can get into semantics about what their intent was but the end result was they had a tanking year. They also had too much talent the year after Brady left to just cut and trade everyone. You could quibble they should they should have done something differently the year before last but you were urging them to do the opposite and sign guys like Hopkins.
They definitely didn't tank, but yes they were bad so it is probably a bit of semantics, but them not intending to tank and then being bad led to a lot of the dysfunction that is being reported.  They also should have gotten a new coach and gm better positioned to tank and pull out of it.  Bill wanting to win did not help a tank at all.

Losing led to dysfunction. Players and coaches don't tank in the NFL if they want to last long. Belichick was trying to win.
I agree, which is why my original post said they waited 4 years to long and should have tanked immediately after Tom left.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #200 on: March 09, 2024, 11:17:53 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13577
  • Tommy Points: 1711
Jeudy traded to Browns for a 5th and 6th round pick.

Broncos gonna tank next season or are they building capital to try something on draft day?

They’d better tank with that dead cap space.  It’s not like they can win if they want to.

A tank season for the Pats sounds good to me. Draft and sign thinking a couple years ahead. Another top 5 pick next year combined with a trade down to net a 1st/2nd in 2025 sounds good  to me.

I want the Patriots to become the OKC Thunder of the NFL for the next 3 years. Accumulate as many valuable assets as possible. If that means trading out of this draft, so be it.

I think people will blow a gasket if Pats go all-in on losing and accumulating assets. But I’m very much in agreement with you.
They should have done it immediately after Tom left. They are 4 years behind schedule.

Are you oddly pretending they didn’t tank last year when they have the third pick in the draft?

I mean you can get into semantics about what their intent was but the end result was they had a tanking year. They also had too much talent the year after Brady left to just cut and trade everyone. You could quibble they should they should have done something differently the year before last but you were urging them to do the opposite and sign guys like Hopkins.
They definitely didn't tank, but yes they were bad so it is probably a bit of semantics, but them not intending to tank and then being bad led to a lot of the dysfunction that is being reported.  They also should have gotten a new coach and gm better positioned to tank and pull out of it.  Bill wanting to win did not help a tank at all.

Losing led to dysfunction. Players and coaches don't tank in the NFL if they want to last long. Belichick was trying to win.
I agree, which is why my original post said they waited 4 years to long and should have tanked immediately after Tom left.

Or they could have just drafted better. I mean, what’s the point of tanking if you can’t identity the right players to take, especially on offense.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #201 on: March 10, 2024, 08:04:46 AM »

Offline Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10314
  • Tommy Points: 465
I say Russell Wilson & Tyler Boyd will sign with Pittsburgh
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #202 on: March 10, 2024, 10:44:11 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34678
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Jeudy traded to Browns for a 5th and 6th round pick.

Broncos gonna tank next season or are they building capital to try something on draft day?

They’d better tank with that dead cap space.  It’s not like they can win if they want to.

A tank season for the Pats sounds good to me. Draft and sign thinking a couple years ahead. Another top 5 pick next year combined with a trade down to net a 1st/2nd in 2025 sounds good  to me.

I want the Patriots to become the OKC Thunder of the NFL for the next 3 years. Accumulate as many valuable assets as possible. If that means trading out of this draft, so be it.

I think people will blow a gasket if Pats go all-in on losing and accumulating assets. But I’m very much in agreement with you.
They should have done it immediately after Tom left. They are 4 years behind schedule.

Are you oddly pretending they didn’t tank last year when they have the third pick in the draft?

I mean you can get into semantics about what their intent was but the end result was they had a tanking year. They also had too much talent the year after Brady left to just cut and trade everyone. You could quibble they should they should have done something differently the year before last but you were urging them to do the opposite and sign guys like Hopkins.
They definitely didn't tank, but yes they were bad so it is probably a bit of semantics, but them not intending to tank and then being bad led to a lot of the dysfunction that is being reported.  They also should have gotten a new coach and gm better positioned to tank and pull out of it.  Bill wanting to win did not help a tank at all.

Losing led to dysfunction. Players and coaches don't tank in the NFL if they want to last long. Belichick was trying to win.
I agree, which is why my original post said they waited 4 years to long and should have tanked immediately after Tom left.

Or they could have just drafted better. I mean, what’s the point of tanking if you can’t identity the right players to take, especially on offense.
Well a tank means no Bill and a new regime. Presumably a coach and a gm so you aren't having a senior citizen do both jobs.  Which invariably should have improved the drafting and would have better set the direction.  So the team doesn't go out and sign guys like JuJu, Reuff, and Elliot who aren't players a tanking team signs (just used those 3 as an example, I'm sure there are countless others over the last 4 seasons). 

The players and coaches don't try to lose, but in the NFL you can set the tone and direction of a franchise pretty easily.  The Patriots set a tone of not tanking and trying to win, but just didn't have the players at any time over the last 4 seasons to do that at anything more than a middling level.  That is the problem.  That is how teams end up of mediocrity (or worse) for far longer than any NFL team needs to.  New England has 1 playoff appearance in a 10-7 season over the last 4 seasons.  Just 1 winning record.  I think it is pretty safe to say they aren't going to have a winning record this next year either (it is certainly possible that Daniels or Maye is like Stroud and they have a miraculous turnaround, but not all that likely either). 

The minute Tom left, the team needed to take a real look in the mirror and maybe you give it a go with Cam that first season, but that 1 season should have been it.  The team absolutely should have tanked Mac's rookie year (if not before).  They should have brought in a young coach for their new young QB.  They should have brought in a GM.  They should have been gutting the team and building it up to build around Mac.  Hard decision to make especially with Bill so close to Shula, but that is what Kraft should have done.  And frankly, Bill should have left New England when Tom went to Tampa. He'd have been able to pick a winning destination (maybe he takes a year off and then goes somewhere with full power again like Payton did in Denver).  He'd have been much more able to pick a winning place in that scenario and he'd be well on his way to Shula if not already well past him, and the narrative that it was basically all Tom and not him wouldn't be as booming, if out there at all. 
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #203 on: March 10, 2024, 05:06:29 PM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37082
  • Tommy Points: 3380
  • On To Banner 19!
As expected, Baker Mayfield back to Tampa. 3 years, 100M, about 50M guaranteed. Good for him!
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #204 on: March 10, 2024, 05:14:05 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34678
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Chris Jones massive 5 year deal to stay with Chiefs. First 3 years at 95 million is fully guaranteed.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #205 on: March 10, 2024, 06:17:48 PM »

Offline Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10314
  • Tommy Points: 465
As expected, Baker Mayfield back to Tampa. 3 years, 100M, about 50M guaranteed. Good for him!
Wow Baker got paid!! Didn’t expect this much
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #206 on: March 10, 2024, 06:26:58 PM »

Offline green_bballers13

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 336
Jeudy traded to Browns for a 5th and 6th round pick.

Broncos gonna tank next season or are they building capital to try something on draft day?

They’d better tank with that dead cap space.  It’s not like they can win if they want to.

A tank season for the Pats sounds good to me. Draft and sign thinking a couple years ahead. Another top 5 pick next year combined with a trade down to net a 1st/2nd in 2025 sounds good  to me.

I want the Patriots to become the OKC Thunder of the NFL for the next 3 years. Accumulate as many valuable assets as possible. If that means trading out of this draft, so be it.

I think people will blow a gasket if Pats go all-in on losing and accumulating assets. But I’m very much in agreement with you.
They should have done it immediately after Tom left. They are 4 years behind schedule.

Are you oddly pretending they didn’t tank last year when they have the third pick in the draft?

I mean you can get into semantics about what their intent was but the end result was they had a tanking year. They also had too much talent the year after Brady left to just cut and trade everyone. You could quibble they should they should have done something differently the year before last but you were urging them to do the opposite and sign guys like Hopkins.
They definitely didn't tank, but yes they were bad so it is probably a bit of semantics, but them not intending to tank and then being bad led to a lot of the dysfunction that is being reported.  They also should have gotten a new coach and gm better positioned to tank and pull out of it.  Bill wanting to win did not help a tank at all.

Losing led to dysfunction. Players and coaches don't tank in the NFL if they want to last long. Belichick was trying to win.
I agree, which is why my original post said they waited 4 years to long and should have tanked immediately after Tom left.

Or they could have just drafted better. I mean, what’s the point of tanking if you can’t identity the right players to take, especially on offense.
And frankly, Bill should have left New England when Tom went to Tampa. He'd have been able to pick a winning destination (maybe he takes a year off and then goes somewhere with full power again like Payton did in Denver).  He'd have been much more able to pick a winning place in that scenario and he'd be well on his way to Shula if not already well past him, and the narrative that it was basically all Tom and not him wouldn't be as booming, if out there at all.

I haven't seen anyone in the NFL community of repute that says it was basically all Tom. The latest Patriots dynasty doc shows how influential Bill was (for right and wrong).

I agree with most everything else you wrote.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2024, 09:36:09 PM by green_bballers13 »
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #207 on: March 10, 2024, 07:05:32 PM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37082
  • Tommy Points: 3380
  • On To Banner 19!
As expected, Baker Mayfield back to Tampa. 3 years, 100M, about 50M guaranteed. Good for him!
Wow Baker got paid!! Didn’t expect this much

Similar to Geno Smith and even Daniel Jones a year ago. Great seasons, reach the playoffs, and with how the QB market is nowadays you're almost guaranteed 9 figures and/or 30M+ AAV.
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #208 on: March 10, 2024, 08:07:08 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34678
  • Tommy Points: 1603
As expected, Baker Mayfield back to Tampa. 3 years, 100M, about 50M guaranteed. Good for him!
Wow Baker got paid!! Didn’t expect this much
He is about 60% of the franchise guys make.  That seems right to me.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: NFL 2023-24 Off-Season
« Reply #209 on: March 10, 2024, 09:56:32 PM »

Offline green_bballers13

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 336
As expected, Baker Mayfield back to Tampa. 3 years, 100M, about 50M guaranteed. Good for him!
Wow Baker got paid!! Didn’t expect this much
He is about 60% of the franchise guys make.  That seems right to me.

Yeah, it's pretty good value for Baker.

The Pats are going to draft Daniels or Maye and sign Brissett.
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.