Author Topic: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24  (Read 14136 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #330 on: January 09, 2024, 11:09:21 AM »

Online Atzar

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9315
  • Tommy Points: 1701
Did Porzingis hit Mathurin's arm at end of game? I could not see it on replay.   Refs on review claim he hit his arm.

KP did foul him.  I think they got that call right.  It was the previous call where they overturned contact to Jaylen's head that they screwed up.


Regarding the energy thing, I think we had a gameplan for Indy's offense with Haliburton and we just weren't prepared for what it looked like without him.  Suddenly all of our scouting reports went out the window because Nesmith is making stepbacks and McConnell is actually hunting his shot.  Credit to Indy, honestly.  The Pacers played their asses off without their best guy and just couldn't miss.  Just wish the game had been settled in a different way.

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #331 on: January 09, 2024, 11:13:32 AM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31247
  • Tommy Points: 1633
  • What a Pub Should Be
Did Porzingis hit Mathurin's arm at end of game? I could not see it on replay.   Refs on review claim he hit his arm.

KP did foul him.  I think they got that call right.  It was the previous call where they overturned contact to Jaylen's head that they screwed up.


Regarding the energy thing, I think we had a gameplan for Indy's offense with Haliburton and we just weren't prepared for what it looked like without him.  Suddenly all of our scouting reports went out the window because Nesmith is making stepbacks and McConnell is actually hunting his shot.  Credit to Indy, honestly.  The Pacers played their asses off without their best guy and just couldn't miss.  Just wish the game had been settled in a different way.

Yeah, it was definitely a foul. There was contact.

The frustrating this is that the refs directly were responsible for the result of the game when they decided to call the JB foul a no-call and then turn around and hand the Pacers the game with the foul call on Porzingis. 

IMO, call both or call neither.

Oh well, it's on to the T-Wolves.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #332 on: January 09, 2024, 11:32:55 AM »

Online jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48972
  • Tommy Points: 2978
https://x.com/kingjames/status/1744752476077613294?s=46&t=lGU0TGXtwjkuVuoin6WTNw

Quote
See what I'm saying! 🤦🏾‍♂️. JB clearly got hit in the back of the head. They reviewed the play, just to reverse it and say he didn't. MAN WHAT!! Good ass game to have an ending like that. And yall see why I be going 🦍 💩 out there when it happens

Even Lebron going in on this now. Will be interesting to see what happens with this, especially with influential players and NBPA Vice Presidents raising concerns about this.

Don’t think it’s as simple as confirming it with the L2M report now.

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #333 on: January 09, 2024, 11:46:44 AM »

Offline bdm860

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6004
  • Tommy Points: 4598
https://x.com/kingjames/status/1744752476077613294?s=46&t=lGU0TGXtwjkuVuoin6WTNw

Quote
See what I'm saying! 🤦🏾‍♂️. JB clearly got hit in the back of the head. They reviewed the play, just to reverse it and say he didn't. MAN WHAT!! Good ass game to have an ending like that. And yall see why I be going 🦍 💩 out there when it happens

Even Lebron going in on this now. Will be interesting to see what happens with this, especially with influential players and NBPA Vice Presidents raising concerns about this.

Don’t think it’s as simple as confirming it with the L2M report now.

Ha, knew LeBron was going to say something, he's still mad about his shot not being ruled a 3 from last week.

https://streamable.com/3969cq

That one was the correct call though.

After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #334 on: January 09, 2024, 11:59:16 AM »

Online Phantom255x

  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31128
  • Tommy Points: 3037
  • On To Banner 18!
https://x.com/kingjames/status/1744752476077613294?s=46&t=lGU0TGXtwjkuVuoin6WTNw

Quote
See what I'm saying! 🤦🏾‍♂️. JB clearly got hit in the back of the head. They reviewed the play, just to reverse it and say he didn't. MAN WHAT!! Good ass game to have an ending like that. And yall see why I be going 🦍 💩 out there when it happens

Even Lebron going in on this now. Will be interesting to see what happens with this, especially with influential players and NBPA Vice Presidents raising concerns about this.

Don’t think it’s as simple as confirming it with the L2M report now.

YEAH LEBRON KNOWS WHAT'S UP! WE AGREE  :laugh:
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #335 on: January 09, 2024, 12:05:03 PM »

Online jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48972
  • Tommy Points: 2978
https://x.com/kingjames/status/1744752476077613294?s=46&t=lGU0TGXtwjkuVuoin6WTNw

Quote
See what I'm saying! 🤦🏾‍♂️. JB clearly got hit in the back of the head. They reviewed the play, just to reverse it and say he didn't. MAN WHAT!! Good ass game to have an ending like that. And yall see why I be going 🦍 💩 out there when it happens

Even Lebron going in on this now. Will be interesting to see what happens with this, especially with influential players and NBPA Vice Presidents raising concerns about this.

Don’t think it’s as simple as confirming it with the L2M report now.

Ha, knew LeBron was going to say something, he's still mad about his shot not being ruled a 3 from last week.

https://streamable.com/3969cq

That one was the correct call though.

It was certainly a close call. I think if they would’ve initially called it a three it would’ve stood.

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #336 on: January 09, 2024, 12:39:02 PM »

Offline mobilija

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2420
  • Tommy Points: 630
2 minute report out yet?

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #337 on: January 09, 2024, 12:48:44 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31247
  • Tommy Points: 1633
  • What a Pub Should Be


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #338 on: January 09, 2024, 01:26:22 PM »

Online liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 43806
  • Tommy Points: 3209
There would've been no time left on the clock if they didn't call the foul. The refs totally sealed this game. The whole legal gambling thing makes it seem even worse.

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #339 on: January 09, 2024, 03:35:39 PM »

Offline bello_man09

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2921
  • Tommy Points: 259
  • "Celtic for life" REBUILD OR TANK
We have KP. Drue, and D white, for Jb to be going one on 3.

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #340 on: January 09, 2024, 04:10:33 PM »

Offline Yuckabuck33

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1444
  • Tommy Points: 176
We have KP. Drue, and D white, for Jb to be going one on 3.
Except Joe is on record (the JJ Redick podcast) saying that he thinks the bedt shot available is the one with the ball in the hands of your best player available. So he's never going to draw a play where those other guys shoot.

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #341 on: January 09, 2024, 04:13:21 PM »

Offline Yuckabuck33

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1444
  • Tommy Points: 176
We have KP. Drue, and D white, for Jb to be going one on 3.
And let's be clear- neither Joe nor JB did anything wrong. JB should have had 2 chances to make 1 free throw for the win, with the Pacers out of timeouts and having to go full court in 3 seconds (and probably not drawing the foul on KP).

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #342 on: January 09, 2024, 04:16:07 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31247
  • Tommy Points: 1633
  • What a Pub Should Be
I keep refreshing the L2M page but still nothing.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #343 on: January 09, 2024, 04:23:06 PM »

Online liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 43806
  • Tommy Points: 3209
Where's that report?

Re: Celtics (28-7) at Pacers (20-15) Game #36 1/8/24
« Reply #344 on: January 09, 2024, 04:25:22 PM »

Online liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 43806
  • Tommy Points: 3209
What is imiminet possesion?

"3.2 4th Quarter – FOUL CHALLENGE – The crew communicated with the Replay Center and determined the foul challenged by the Pacers was overturned to no foul. At the time of the whistle, the Pacers had imminent possession."