Have to think Hauser goes next.
I think we are going to see that Hauser has value around the league to. He's a 40% shooting specialist with size on a contract that is significant less than the MLE. It's a better contract than other players like Duncan Robinson, Isaiah Joe, and other shooting specialist have.
That?s why I think they keep him. Good player, above average defense and fine rebounder, in a role (sharpshooter) that is a requirement for a team w championship aspirations. And, contrary to some people?s thinking, Scheirman does not replace that.
I have to ask -- why not?
Sam has shown he can get hot and provide a real scoring lift and has shown that if he were in a real offensive system instead of Joe's obsession with just chucking 3's, he can score on the move particularly if he drives a bit if run off the 3 point line. He's also shown he can be ice cold too and had a lot more of those nights this past season. He plays with effort on D but is frequently the point of attack for other teams. his ballhandling (which he does very little of) and passing are mediocre at best. his rebounding is meh. He had a number of games where he was pretty invisible on the court - I attribute a good part of that to Joe's garbage offense not making a point of getting the ball to Hauser where he can get a shot off.
Baylor, after that brutal beginning of the season where he couldn't make anything, showed he has the same range as Sam, has much better passing skills, better ballhandling skills and his D can be at least as passable as Sam's. Need to see more to see if he's a better rebounder.
I think Baylor can provide as much as Hauser if not more. In a vacuum, I'd like to have both but if we need to move Hauser for financial reasons, I feel pretty confident Baylor can step into that role pretty well.