it would seem the JT, JB, Marcus trio has run its course, and the best path forward is to rebuild the roster around tatum’s strengths and weaknesses. if you’re gm of the C’s, what’s your plan?
without naming specific players, which i will probably add later in this thread, tatum needs the following to reach his potential (in no particular order):
- a big who is a legit low post threat to open up the driving/shooting lanes for JT, and who is a solid rebounder
- a floor general PG who will keep the ball moving and get JT the ball in his preferred spots
- a spot-up shooter who can keep opposing defenses honest and knock down the open threes
- a nasty, hard nosed veteran who will do the dirty work, raise the intensity of this team, and push JT to be mentally tougher
- a no nonsense coach with an offensive approach that plays to JT’s strengths, and a defensive minded 1A assistant who will return the C’s to a defensive mentality
Interestingly, I think you have the right list in the opposite order of importance for me - the only one I really don't agree with is the low post offense, simply because the NBA isn't that league anymore, for better or worse. The rules we have now don't particularly compliment low post play and it's a bit of a lost art across the guys in the league for that reason.
So, on points 4&5:
None of us know what blend of Hardy/Mazz/Udoka/Stat brought out the defense last year, but a few things are clear - Horford's not capable of anchoring our defense anymore, Williams probably isn't up to replacing him, and the rest of the bigs, save Timelord, are essentially dead weight. Not to say they can't do it, but so far they haven't. So a reshuffle of the coaching staff (I think Mazzulla stays after this series so we need to see who else is brought in as assistants) as well as some defensively-minded players closer to the rim than Smart & Tatum are the most important for me.
Point 3 is a 'gimmie', to a degree - of course we want players who can knock down open shots. Our bench being paper thin after the top 7 really hurt us because we didn't have that.
I struggle with Point 2, so I think that's the one we should talk about.
So: it absolutely makes sense that we need a steady handed playmaker when we can't 'improvise' our way to offensive success, however I don't think the current core have played at their best with a scoring point guard (like Kemba), and in fact our successes last year stem from the Horford/Walker trade, which let Smart be the primary point guard, a move that was nearly as impactful as Horford being incredible on the switch.
That's a difficult circle to square, especially because we're almost certainly not going to have the same defensive impact from our bigs next year if the roster stays the same anyway, so I'm hesitant to compromise on wing defense as well.
Plus,while our offense certainly has periods where it stagnates to the point where time seems to split open and every possession takes roughly a thousand years off of my life as a fan, I'm not sure we actually do better if we, say, swap Marcus out for a Chris Paul type who can execute in the halfcourt. Again and as well, I'm not sure how many playmaking points are really left in the league that fit with the timeline of our core, which is also a concern if we're suggesting (for example) flipping JT and Smart for this playmaking PG.