B. I don't consider it a lowball offer for someone age 37, 38, and 39. It provides certainty and a conclusion to the end of his career and it is reasonable money for a player at the end of his career.
The thing is you're talking about Al signing that contract now, immediately after being the best big on a Finals team (outcome tbd), not a few years down the line when he's 38. There's no reason for him to sign that extension this summer, which is the discussion being had.
And again, the extension Moranis proposes is prohibited by the CBA. This is all so silly.
Because the cut in the first year is too large?
Yep. He’d have to make $15.9 million in year one alone.
What is the rule that would limit Horford to that $15.9m?
Browsing cbafaq.com, I'm seeing declines (like raises) are limited to 8%, and that extensions always include the remaining season of the contract (this is all under #53).
So wouldn't an extension for Al have to start at $24.38m, which would be an 8% decline off his now guaranteed $26.5m for '23 (which would be considered the first year of the contract)?
Or is there another rule I'm missing?
On what Horford is actually worth at 37, 38, 39, of course I'm hoping he takes a sweetheart deal to stay with the C's. Hoping for the narrative that he chased the money with Philly last time and was miserable, so is willing to leave money on the table now and wants to retire as Celtic.