Author Topic: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap  (Read 89400 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #465 on: June 03, 2022, 03:17:02 AM »

Offline trickybilly

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5853
  • Tommy Points: 643
Just curious, how many people are still sad about that 2028 pick swap?
"Gimme the ball, gimme the ball". Freddy Quimby, 1994.

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #466 on: June 03, 2022, 06:01:13 AM »

Offline ozgod

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18754
  • Tommy Points: 1527
Everyone who was knocking Derrick because of his mediocre stats or his mediocre shooting doesn't see anything past the box score. He consistently has a high +/- and his advanced metrics are solid. He contributes to winning because of everything else he does.
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D


Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #467 on: June 03, 2022, 08:53:48 AM »

Offline JohnBoy65

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 929
  • Tommy Points: 134
It was so obvious that DWhite was a complete headcase in his first few months in Boston. As soon as he missed a shot his body language changed right away. I was never worried about him finding his shot. He's a professional basketball player that was always going to come back. Ozgod is right. Everyone who watched the games could tell he made the right play 90% of the time. That's what this team needed, badly. He's the same player now, and his shot is back. He's a perfect rotation piece for this team. Well done, Brad!

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #468 on: June 03, 2022, 09:14:49 AM »

Offline MarcusSmartFanClub

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1096
  • Tommy Points: 59
Richardson's presence and Langford's defense would've been nice tonight.
Yeah, we only won by 23 - really needed an injury-prone scrub and an end of bench guard to be the cherry on top ::)

Definitely would have preferred those two to the guy who led the team in +/- tonight.   ::)
Ha, yeah - White is usually on the floor when we go on big runs. Not coincidentally.

This voodoo osmosis “glue guy” take remains the only soft defense for how badly Stevens overpaid for White.
Only if you don't appreciate upgrading passing and defence :)

He has not upgraded either. These are just excuses.
Lol, sure he hasn't :)

Your dedication (or obsession) is certainly something. Not grounded in reality, but certainly something.

Should say the same for you. Just because you wanted to defend the trade when it first happened doesn’t mean you can’t now admit we overpaid.

For context, maybe check how Spurs fans feel about the deal. Hint: they’re very pleased.

They're also sitting at home awaiting the draft lottery to start while this Celtics team is still playing. 

I'm not sure anyone on this board really gives two [dang]s on how Spurs fans are feeling right now.

What’s that got to do with Brick White? Nothing, unless you think he’s some sort of lucky charm.
It's the cringeworthy attempts like these, without acknowledging the provable ways in which White is superior to Richardson, that make people laugh at your takes.

Right. Provable. Like “the Cs tend to go on runs when White’s on the floor” provable?

C’mon. Admit the “provable” elements — like scoring, 4th quarter scoring, shooting percentage, falling assist rate (sub 2 in the playoffs for a PG), and 4th quarter assist rate are not in White’s favor, or perhaps you’re not a great judge of humor — or skill.

Furthermore, I think the notion that questioning White and / or the deal to acquire him is somehow sacrilege because the Cs are still a very good team is ridiculous. This “how dare you” mindset reflects a bit of a low standard.

Put down the Pom-Poms for a minute. White is by far our worst rotation player — it’s not really all that close. It’s beyond reasonable to wonder whether giving up picks on top of Richardson was a shrewd idea — both for the now, and for the future. Not sure why it gets this groups blood up quite so much.

Mostly, I think guys are just annoyed that I’m questioning anything at all while the Cs are on a playoff run. I seriously doubt you or others actually believe White is worth what he’s paid, or what the Ca paid for him.

Nothing about White — provable or not — has won the Cs a single game since he arrived. They’d be in the precisely the same place they are today if the Spurs deal had never happened.

I love this one. Where is Todd Days hiding?

Let's go Dwhite, let's go bench guards, let's go 4th quarter basketball, let's go Celtics!

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #469 on: June 03, 2022, 09:18:27 AM »

Offline celts55

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2680
  • Tommy Points: 579
Been saying all along, if he can start hitting open 3’s , he’d be great for this team.
Man, he was big last night.
Now if Grant could wake up

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #470 on: June 03, 2022, 09:36:10 AM »

Offline iadera

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 964
  • Tommy Points: 74
  • CroCeltics
This series just fits better to White. Warriors are, compared to Bucks and Heat, a bit softer on the def. end. White feels it and just uses it. It's obvious he's much more comfortable then in last 2 series...

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #471 on: June 03, 2022, 09:43:01 AM »

Online tonydelk

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2187
  • Tommy Points: 522
Richardson's presence and Langford's defense would've been nice tonight.
Yeah, we only won by 23 - really needed an injury-prone scrub and an end of bench guard to be the cherry on top ::)

Definitely would have preferred those two to the guy who led the team in +/- tonight.   ::)
Ha, yeah - White is usually on the floor when we go on big runs. Not coincidentally.

This voodoo osmosis “glue guy” take remains the only soft defense for how badly Stevens overpaid for White.
Only if you don't appreciate upgrading passing and defence :)

He has not upgraded either. These are just excuses.
Lol, sure he hasn't :)

Your dedication (or obsession) is certainly something. Not grounded in reality, but certainly something.

Should say the same for you. Just because you wanted to defend the trade when it first happened doesn’t mean you can’t now admit we overpaid.

For context, maybe check how Spurs fans feel about the deal. Hint: they’re very pleased.

They're also sitting at home awaiting the draft lottery to start while this Celtics team is still playing. 

I'm not sure anyone on this board really gives two [dang]s on how Spurs fans are feeling right now.

What’s that got to do with Brick White? Nothing, unless you think he’s some sort of lucky charm.
It's the cringeworthy attempts like these, without acknowledging the provable ways in which White is superior to Richardson, that make people laugh at your takes.

Right. Provable. Like “the Cs tend to go on runs when White’s on the floor” provable?

C’mon. Admit the “provable” elements — like scoring, 4th quarter scoring, shooting percentage, falling assist rate (sub 2 in the playoffs for a PG), and 4th quarter assist rate are not in White’s favor, or perhaps you’re not a great judge of humor — or skill.

Furthermore, I think the notion that questioning White and / or the deal to acquire him is somehow sacrilege because the Cs are still a very good team is ridiculous. This “how dare you” mindset reflects a bit of a low standard.

Put down the Pom-Poms for a minute. White is by far our worst rotation player — it’s not really all that close. It’s beyond reasonable to wonder whether giving up picks on top of Richardson was a shrewd idea — both for the now, and for the future. Not sure why it gets this groups blood up quite so much.

Mostly, I think guys are just annoyed that I’m questioning anything at all while the Cs are on a playoff run. I seriously doubt you or others actually believe White is worth what he’s paid, or what the Ca paid for him.

Nothing about White — provable or not — has won the Cs a single game since he arrived. They’d be in the precisely the same place they are today if the Spurs deal had never happened.

I love this one. Where is Todd Days hiding?

Let's go Dwhite, let's go bench guards, let's go 4th quarter basketball, let's go Celtics!

All I can do after reading this rant is laugh.  Dwhite our worst rotational player. LOL.  The C's would not be in the finals with Jrich and Romeo over White.  Fact.

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #472 on: June 03, 2022, 09:46:57 AM »

Offline Kernewek

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4689
  • Tommy Points: 298
  • International Superstar
Richardson's presence and Langford's defense would've been nice tonight.
Yeah, we only won by 23 - really needed an injury-prone scrub and an end of bench guard to be the cherry on top ::)

Definitely would have preferred those two to the guy who led the team in +/- tonight.   ::)
Ha, yeah - White is usually on the floor when we go on big runs. Not coincidentally.

This voodoo osmosis “glue guy” take remains the only soft defense for how badly Stevens overpaid for White.
Only if you don't appreciate upgrading passing and defence :)

He has not upgraded either. These are just excuses.
Lol, sure he hasn't :)

Your dedication (or obsession) is certainly something. Not grounded in reality, but certainly something.

Should say the same for you. Just because you wanted to defend the trade when it first happened doesn’t mean you can’t now admit we overpaid.

For context, maybe check how Spurs fans feel about the deal. Hint: they’re very pleased.

They're also sitting at home awaiting the draft lottery to start while this Celtics team is still playing. 

I'm not sure anyone on this board really gives two [dang]s on how Spurs fans are feeling right now.

What’s that got to do with Brick White? Nothing, unless you think he’s some sort of lucky charm.
It's the cringeworthy attempts like these, without acknowledging the provable ways in which White is superior to Richardson, that make people laugh at your takes.

Right. Provable. Like “the Cs tend to go on runs when White’s on the floor” provable?

C’mon. Admit the “provable” elements — like scoring, 4th quarter scoring, shooting percentage, falling assist rate (sub 2 in the playoffs for a PG), and 4th quarter assist rate are not in White’s favor, or perhaps you’re not a great judge of humor — or skill.

Furthermore, I think the notion that questioning White and / or the deal to acquire him is somehow sacrilege because the Cs are still a very good team is ridiculous. This “how dare you” mindset reflects a bit of a low standard.

Put down the Pom-Poms for a minute. White is by far our worst rotation player — it’s not really all that close. It’s beyond reasonable to wonder whether giving up picks on top of Richardson was a shrewd idea — both for the now, and for the future. Not sure why it gets this groups blood up quite so much.

Mostly, I think guys are just annoyed that I’m questioning anything at all while the Cs are on a playoff run. I seriously doubt you or others actually believe White is worth what he’s paid, or what the Ca paid for him.

Nothing about White — provable or not — has won the Cs a single game since he arrived. They’d be in the precisely the same place they are today if the Spurs deal had never happened.

I love this one. Where is Todd Days hiding?

Let's go Dwhite, let's go bench guards, let's go 4th quarter basketball, let's go Celtics!

Maybe he read the links we all provided and saw the error of his ways?
"...unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo-realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms. I do not distrust their motives; I distrust their power. They have a lot of it."

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #473 on: June 03, 2022, 11:44:58 AM »

Online Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7959
  • Tommy Points: 1035
This series just fits better to White. Warriors are, compared to Bucks and Heat, a bit softer on the def. end. White feels it and just uses it. It's obvious he's much more comfortable then in last 2 series...

Although I agree White is particularly well-suited for a matchup vs. the Warriors, we don’t get to the finals without White’s play in games 4-7 vs. the Heat.

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #474 on: June 03, 2022, 11:45:50 AM »

Online jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13767
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
It's unfortunate what this thread has turned into. If you were one of those people who thought White was legitimately awesome before the Miami series, then you were wrong. It was okay to be supportive of him and claim that he would come around, but he was a broken player for most of his time here.

Of course White won't continue to shoot as well as he has been recently, but this was the player we all thought we were getting. People have to knock it off with the outside the box score nonsense. White is on a 4yr/$73M contract. Simply put, he needs to contribute and he is now proving to be a very valuable player to this team - both within the box score and outside of it.

I am happy to have him on this team moving forward and hopefully he can continue to feel love from the fanbase and players, because it was clear he didn't feel that he was totally fitting in.

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #475 on: June 03, 2022, 12:29:57 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
Just curious, how many people are still sad about that 2028 pick swap?
Emphasis really should be on the pick swap.  People just SO irrational about it.  It's a lottery ticket that was simply the cost of doing business.  Some day it might just go poof and turn into nothing.  Even is the pick does convey, the chances that it turns into a star are not very high.

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #476 on: June 03, 2022, 12:37:56 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63039
  • Tommy Points: -25463
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Just curious, how many people are still sad about that 2028 pick swap?
Emphasis really should be on the pick swap.  People just SO irrational about it.  It's a lottery ticket that was simply the cost of doing business.  Some day it might just go poof and turn into nothing.  Even is the pick does convey, the chances that it turns into a star are not very high.

I mean, if the trade contributes to a title, nobody cares.

But, I'm against "lottery tickets" in trades.  Any deal that could result in you swapping the #2 pick for a non-lottery pick (see Nets, Brooklyn) needs to be worth the downside risk.  I think Brad probably could have gotten San Antonio to add some different protections if push came to shove.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #477 on: June 03, 2022, 12:50:51 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
Just curious, how many people are still sad about that 2028 pick swap?
Emphasis really should be on the pick swap.  People just SO irrational about it.  It's a lottery ticket that was simply the cost of doing business.  Some day it might just go poof and turn into nothing.  Even is the pick does convey, the chances that it turns into a star are not very high.

I mean, if the trade contributes to a title, nobody cares.

But, I'm against "lottery tickets" in trades.  Any deal that could result in you swapping the #2 pick for a non-lottery pick (see Nets, Brooklyn) needs to be worth the downside risk.  I think Brad probably could have gotten San Antonio to add some different protections if push came to shove.
Obviously it's hard to put a value on the swap itself.  Call it a lottery ticket, a wildcard or whatever.  My point is that people are not being rational about it.  It's being way over valued IMO.  Even if it does turn into the second pick, that guy could bust (and the 20th pick could turn into D White or either Williams).  There are just too many what if's to be worried about it as much as some are.

Also, maybe Brad/Ime valued D White THAT much?  I mean, it's easy to see why.  He is the quintessential modern basketball player.  Aside from scoring, he's really really good at most everything else.  He's oil for an engine.  Everything runs so much smoother with D White. 

As thinking that we could get White for less, there simply is no basis for that.  None whatsoever.  Push likely already came to shove and that was the deal.  Hey, sometimes you just have to pay retail.  Scared money don't make money.  All that stuff.

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #478 on: June 03, 2022, 01:00:49 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63039
  • Tommy Points: -25463
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Just curious, how many people are still sad about that 2028 pick swap?
Emphasis really should be on the pick swap.  People just SO irrational about it.  It's a lottery ticket that was simply the cost of doing business.  Some day it might just go poof and turn into nothing.  Even is the pick does convey, the chances that it turns into a star are not very high.

I mean, if the trade contributes to a title, nobody cares.

But, I'm against "lottery tickets" in trades.  Any deal that could result in you swapping the #2 pick for a non-lottery pick (see Nets, Brooklyn) needs to be worth the downside risk.  I think Brad probably could have gotten San Antonio to add some different protections if push came to shove.
Obviously it's hard to put a value on the swap itself.  Call it a lottery ticket, a wildcard or whatever.  My point is that people are not being rational about it.  It's being way over valued IMO.  Even if it does turn into the second pick, that guy could bust (and the 20th pick could turn into D White or either Williams).  There are just too many what if's to be worried about it as much as some are.

Also, maybe Brad/Ime valued D White THAT much?  I mean, it's easy to see why.  He is the quintessential modern basketball player.  Aside from scoring, he's really really good at most everything else.  He's oil for an engine.  Everything runs so much smoother with D White. 

As thinking that we could get White for less, there simply is no basis for that.  None whatsoever.  Push likely already came to shove and that was the deal.  Hey, sometimes you just have to pay retail.  Scared money don't make money.  All that stuff.

Ultimately, that all comes into the downside risk I mentioned, and how we eventually evaluate the trade.  It's a results driven league.

If White helps win us a title, I think you can end evaluation there.  If not, then you look at his contributions this season and over the next two years, versus whatever Richardson / Langford / the #1 / the swap turn into.  To me, Richardson, Langford and the #1 are all "good risk", because we had a reasonable idea about the relative upsides and downsides of those assets.  The only thing we don't really know is that pick swap, along with White's future performance.

If White is a solid piece her for three seasons or more, and the swap pick doesn't convey or it's only a minor move down, then it's going to be classified as a good trade in retrospect.

If White performs as he did in the regular season in Boston (good movement, good defense, poor shooting), but the Celtics are in the lottery and we drop down 10+ spots, it's probably going to be a bad trade.

I definitely understand the concept of a buyer's premium, and it's fair to conclude that we paid that to get a player we really needed.  I think it's equally fair for others to withhold judgment until we see where things end up, but who don't feel comfortable with the risk.

Regardless, though, the simplest thing is just to win the title, so that nobody can complain anymore.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Re: Celts get Derrick White for Richardson, Langford, #1, 2028 pick swap
« Reply #479 on: June 03, 2022, 01:03:12 PM »

Offline MarcusSmartFanClub

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1096
  • Tommy Points: 59
Just curious, how many people are still sad about that 2028 pick swap?
Emphasis really should be on the pick swap.  People just SO irrational about it.  It's a lottery ticket that was simply the cost of doing business.  Some day it might just go poof and turn into nothing.  Even is the pick does convey, the chances that it turns into a star are not very high.

I mean, if the trade contributes to a title, nobody cares.

But, I'm against "lottery tickets" in trades.  Any deal that could result in you swapping the #2 pick for a non-lottery pick (see Nets, Brooklyn) needs to be worth the downside risk.  I think Brad probably could have gotten San Antonio to add some different protections if push came to shove.

In what world would the Celtics have the #2 pick? They are one of the most talented and young teams in the league. I have been watching Stranger Things, and I definitely love the supernatural, but this seems very far-fetched and is used more as a philosophy than an actual thing.