Richardson's presence and Langford's defense would've been nice tonight.
Yeah, we only won by 23 - really needed an injury-prone scrub and an end of bench guard to be the cherry on top 
Definitely would have preferred those two to the guy who led the team in +/- tonight. 
Ha, yeah - White is usually on the floor when we go on big runs. Not coincidentally.
This voodoo osmosis “glue guy” take remains the only soft defense for how badly Stevens overpaid for White.
Only if you don't appreciate upgrading passing and defence 
He has not upgraded either. These are just excuses.
Lol, sure he hasn't 
Your dedication (or obsession) is certainly something. Not grounded in reality, but certainly something.
Should say the same for you. Just because you wanted to defend the trade when it first happened doesn’t mean you can’t now admit we overpaid.
For context, maybe check how Spurs fans feel about the deal. Hint: they’re very pleased.
They're also sitting at home awaiting the draft lottery to start while this Celtics team is still playing.
I'm not sure anyone on this board really gives two [dang]s on how Spurs fans are feeling right now.
What’s that got to do with Brick White? Nothing, unless you think he’s some sort of lucky charm.
It's the cringeworthy attempts like these, without acknowledging the provable ways in which White is superior to Richardson, that make people laugh at your takes.
Right. Provable. Like “the Cs tend to go on runs when White’s on the floor” provable?
C’mon. Admit the “provable” elements — like scoring, 4th quarter scoring, shooting percentage, falling assist rate (sub 2 in the playoffs for a PG), and 4th quarter assist rate are not in White’s favor, or perhaps you’re not a great judge of humor — or skill.
Furthermore, I think the notion that questioning White and / or the deal to acquire him is somehow sacrilege because the Cs are still a very good team is ridiculous. This “how dare you” mindset reflects a bit of a low standard.
Put down the Pom-Poms for a minute. White is by far our worst rotation player — it’s not really all that close. It’s beyond reasonable to wonder whether giving up picks on top of Richardson was a shrewd idea — both for the now, and for the future. Not sure why it gets this groups blood up quite so much.
Mostly, I think guys are just annoyed that I’m questioning anything at all while the Cs are on a playoff run. I seriously doubt you or others actually believe White is worth what he’s paid, or what the Ca paid for him.
Nothing about White — provable or not — has won the Cs a single game since he arrived. They’d be in the precisely the same place they are today if the Spurs deal had never happened.
I'd like to take some time here to look at these two lines:
Right. Provable. Like “the Cs tend to go on runs when White’s on the floor” provable?
C’mon. Admit the “provable” elements — like scoring, 4th quarter scoring, shooting percentage, falling assist rate (sub 2 in the playoffs for a PG), and 4th quarter assist rate are not in White’s favor, or perhaps you’re not a great judge of humor — or skill.
It's funny, because you can prove these things. But if you care about scoring and shooting (as we can see in the bolded, they make up three fifths of your evaluation), White is never going to be your guy.
If you are actually interested in why, you can get a little bit of analysis from our former home, over at Celtics blog:
https://www.celticsblog.com/2022/5/6/23059906/contributing-beyond-the-box-score-derrick-whites-game-2-boston-celtics-nba-playoffsBut if you really want to dive into what makes Derrick White good (rather than just being someone who insists on insulting people for actually looking at the game in a way you refuse to), I suggest you start with this Cody Houdek (of Thinking Basketball | Premium Hoops) article from last year:
https://premiumhoops.org/2021/05/06/derrick-white-and-the-curious-case-of-the-league-average-perimeter-defender/and use
that as a jumping off point for evaluation.
If you want to do that, you can check the 2021-2022 D-LEBRON metric here (I don't love it as much as Houdek does but for defensive metrics it's better than most):
https://www.bball-index.com/2021-22-lebron-data/Lastly, if your primary metric of value is effectively 'man put ball in basket go swiiiish' I'm not sure I would insult other people for their judgement of basketball skill.