it is funny because Ray Allen was almost traded for OJ Mayo in what was seen as the trade that would give Celtics the edge, but he hit the championship point some years later for the team of our greatest rivals at that time...

 

it is funny because Ray Allen was almost traded for OJ Mayo in what was seen as the trade that would give Celtics the edge, but he hit the championship point some years later for the team of our greatest rivals at that time...

 

No he didn’t really.

I hope EF comes out smoking in game 2 and proves Bill Simmons wrong. Then Bill will probably say that was another “jinx”. 

Slightly off topic, did you guys catch that podcast with Bill and Jackie Mac when they discussed the All NBA selection? I’m all for leaving JT out but to include Lebron, who only played 43 games, is really disappointing to hear from them. JT didn’t make his teammates better and LBJ was “the best player” each time he played? Didn’t both the Celtics and Lakers end up as 8th seeds who needed to go through the play in games? Sorry for the rant. This Lebron bias is just getting to my nerves. And now the NBA came out with a statement on why he was allowed to play despite the covid protocol violation. And yet all throughout the season they didn’t bother explaining why players missed games. *End of rant*

I think that we could find a whole lot of "all time historically" bad / good players if we adjusted the parameters unnaturally enough.  Are the players who scored fewer than 9 ppg not historically worse, for instance?  It seems like odd criteria weighted to come to a biased conclusion.

TP. Was going to say the same thing. Strange parameters that sure seemed to be looking for a foregone conclusion

Bill Simmons' biggest flaw was that he started to take himself seriously.

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, [dang]ed lies and statistics."
- Mark Twain

Eye test also suggests that Fournier's offensive game (especially his on-ball skills) don't hold up well against playoff defences. This doesn't mean that he's not a good player, it just means that his RS numbers overstate his actual prowess in the games that truly matter.

Is there a historically bad player who:

- scored below 43.24% eFG
- had less than 3 assists per game
- played more than 22.7 minutes per game
- shot at least 2 3s per game
- has a last name beginning with a letter from E to P

Anyone?

Lol, funny !

But it is sure Evan collapsed last year and this first match. It isn't pressure I guess but his intensity is in question. I hope he finds a way to show off in this serie; if not I think he may not stay in the team (but can bring a good TPE).
Saddly I wanted to see him as the 4th option or 6TH men, where he could be reliable, cause as a 2a offensive option in PO , I don't think he makes it...