Think the Hayward opts in and Cs try to extend him for a lower AAV.
I don’t think ownership will let danny do that. Unless Hayward takes a 7-8 M a year contract after next season I think he’s gone sooner or later before next season starts.
Huh?? You really think Hayward is only worth $8 mil per??? I think the Cs can get Hayward on an 3 year extension worth around $20 mil per. I think that’s roughly what he’s worth.
If he opts in and has another year like this one he is a MLE player.
He averaged 18,6,5 as the 4th option on the Cs while shooting at a 50/38/86 clip. He’s worth significantly more than the MLE and he’ll get it in this league.
And can't stay healthy. What is the point of being good for 40 games when the season is 82+.
Hayward has only once played 40 games or less, it was when he broke his ankle.

I said being good not games played.
And you're still wrong, because he played really well this season, and he played 52 games in a shortened season. Regardless of any of this, there is a zero percent chance he's only gonna get the MLE, unless some catastrophic injury happens.
I absolutely feel Im right. Just like with Al last year when I said I wouldn't pay him more than the MLE and got heat. Just because a guy might get more doesn't mean that player is worth that money come season time. If Hayward misses any time due to injury and plays like he has here he is a MLE player. Let someone else make the mistake of paying him more.
I don't think Hayward is a max player, but trying to say he's an MLE guy is kind of a joke. He averaged 17.5/6.7/4.1 while flirting with 50/40/90 percentages this season. He's worth at least Reddick/Hardaway Jr. money.
If he keeps getting hurt and he can't be counted on then even with those numbers he is a MLE guy. If you want to overpay him be my guest. As I said I took heat for Al and I'm sitting pretty good right now. You ain't moving my opinion.
I don't care about moving your opinion, but you keep throwing things out that aren't actually facts. First, he doesn't play in half of the season's game, then the goalposts were moved that he wasn't good in those games. Again, the stats - surface stats or advanced - don't back you up. If you just don't like the guy, fine. But just say so and say it with your chest lol.
He probably should be wording his opinion in a different way, but there is a legitimate discussion to be had about Hayward moving forward. I'd love him to be that shiny 27 y/o all-star we signed back in 2017, but time has not been kind to Hayward. Looking ahead, not only is he on the wrong side of 30, but he has had one devastating injury and - just this year - a couple of others that turned out a lot worse than they actually looked on the court.
Of course a healthy Hayward is worth $20M+ over the next 4 years, but it isn't unreasonable to think that Hayward's best days are behind him. The question becomes, will he age gracefully into his mid-late 30s continuing his crafty all-around game, or will his body continue to let him down? I am pushing for the guy and hope he can put these injuries behind him. These past couple of years must have been really hard on him mentally.