So Chris Mannix had a tweet before the C's were officially out of the AD sweepstakes last summer:
https://twitter.com/SIChrisMannix/status/1138915360399351809Boston's dilemma: Offer Tatum -- along with a package of young players and picks -- and New Orleans probably bites. But if Kyrie walks this year, Davis the next all the gains made in the Nets trade disappear.
I thought this was kind of ridiculous reasoning, because when you think about, how many trades are still paying off 6-7 years later? Very, very few. Like I would never consider it a negative if a trade stopped paying off after only 7 years (which is an eternity in NBA years), but apparently Mannix would.
But on the flip side, how awesome is it that that trade is indeed paying off 7 years later with no end in sight!

And then when you really think about, should we be thanking Danny or ML Carr?
ML Carr traded Eric Montross for Antoine Walker
Antoine Walker was traded for Raef Lafrentz
Raef Lafrentz was traded for Ratliff/Telfair
Ratliff/Telfair were traded for Garnett
Garnett was traded for Tatum/Brown.
So none of this is possible without ML Carr.
Thank you Danny or thank you ML Carr???