Author Topic: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?  (Read 15101 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #15 on: June 20, 2019, 10:54:40 PM »

Offline Jvalin

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3779
  • Tommy Points: 739
Do you guys believe Vuc is gonna attract max offer(s)? He may be the perfect fit for CBS's system, but I don't think he's worth the max.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2019, 11:04:57 PM by Jvalin »

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #16 on: June 20, 2019, 10:55:39 PM »

Offline Sketch5

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3247
  • Tommy Points: 281
What are people's thoughts on trading for Capela + signing DLo?

This makes the most sense with the amount of offense we would have and helps with the D.

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #17 on: June 20, 2019, 10:57:21 PM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
I’d gladly sign Cousins to a nice short term contract (2 years with 1 being a PO).

Then use the remaining to sign Beverly and another big who can switch PF/C. We have so much perimeter talent and scoring in J’s and Hayward that I’d rather get a low usage role player like Beverly instead of trying to get Russell.
- LilRip

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #18 on: June 20, 2019, 10:57:42 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
D'Lo and Cousins.

Russell could actually have a fantastic season like Irving did, improve his efficiency, and become more well rounded on defense and passing.

I think Ainge might actually take a stab at DMC, and run with both William's at the 5 in short spurts.

This allows Hayward to go from the 1 to 4 spots occasionally.

Maybe one of those guys but both?? Why? So much for handing the reins over to the J’s. Now they’re worse off than last year because Russell+Cousins would be a more high usage duo than Kyrie+Horford

I do think Cousins will most likely sit out for most of the half of the season.

D'Lo will probably loosen his USG % rate, and lower his shot taking. He's always been an excellent passer on the bounce, and great decision maker. Plus being on the terrible Lakers team probably hindered his development.

I think he can bounce back.

We will probably go after D'Lo for sure though, we're lacking a PG, plus the four headed snake of Brown, Langford, D'Lo, and Smart will be awesome to watch.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #19 on: June 20, 2019, 10:59:11 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
I hope Danny is tampering with other players like other teams tampered with his players.

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #20 on: June 20, 2019, 10:59:55 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
What are people's thoughts on trading for Capela + signing DLo?

This makes the most sense with the amount of offense we would have and helps with the D.

Do we have that much offense? Jayson's efficiency dropped a bit this year as teams gameplanned for him more. I'm concerned when he's going to be THE guy that teams key in on game in and game out. There's no more Al and Kyrie to draw attention from him nor Jaylen. That's going to matter.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2019, 11:08:36 PM by RJ87 »
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #21 on: June 20, 2019, 11:00:02 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
My guess would by Vucevic

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #22 on: June 20, 2019, 11:03:51 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
I'm more and more convinced that we're aiming to land Russell in free agency.

With Phoenix now looking to be out of the running for him, the reports that Brooklyn will not keep Russell if they get Kyrie - even only Kyrie - our suddenly significant cap room that we've cleared up, and the fact that Russell is seemingly a good fit with the Jays and our current timeline, I think it makes a ton of sense. A Russell, Brown, Tatum, Hayward, Williams lineup would be extremely fun to watch and would be perfectly built as a run-and-gun team, which we've unfortunately gotten away from in recent years. Then you have the Russell Instagram picture tonight of Romeo being picked by the C's.

The only question would be solidifying the bigs. Would love to just forcefeed Williams minutes, as I think he has a ton of potential if he gets the chance. If we clear maximal cap space and sign Russell to the max, that'd leave us around $6M - $7M left in cap space, I believe. Maybe we could bring in a Dedmon/Davis type player as a backup big off the bench, too.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #23 on: June 20, 2019, 11:06:07 PM »

Offline PAOBoston

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8134
  • Tommy Points: 535
I'm more and more convinced that we're aiming to land Russell in free agency.

With Phoenix now looking to be out of the running for him, the reports that Brooklyn will not keep Russell if they get Kyrie - even only Kyrie - our suddenly significant cap room that we've cleared up, and the fact that Russell is seemingly a good fit with the Jays and our current timeline, I think it makes a ton of sense. A Russell, Brown, Tatum, Hayward, Williams lineup would be extremely fun to watch and would be perfectly built as a run-and-gun team, which we've unfortunately gotten away from in recent years. Then you have the Russell Instagram picture tonight of Romeo being picked by the C's.

The only question would be solidifying the bigs. Would love to just forcefeed Williams minutes, as I think he has a ton of potential if he gets the chance. If we clear maximal cap space and sign Russell to the max, that'd leave us around $6M - $7M left in cap space, I believe. Maybe we could bring in a Dedmon/Davis type player as a backup big off the bench, too.
Sign Russell and trade for Capella? Can they make that work money wise?

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #24 on: June 20, 2019, 11:08:07 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
Then you have the Russell Instagram picture tonight of Romeo being picked by the C's.

I think that has more to do with him being cool with Romeo than an indication he's interested in Boston.
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #25 on: June 20, 2019, 11:08:22 PM »

Offline Muzzy66

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 984
  • Tommy Points: 177
D'Lo and Cousins.

Russell could actually have a fantastic season like Irving did, improve his efficiency, and become more well rounded on defense and passing.

I think Ainge might actually take a stab at DMC, and run with both William's at the 5 in short spurts.

This allows Hayward to go from the 1 to 4 spots occasionally.

Maybe one of those guys but both?? Why? So much for handing the reins over to the J’s. Now they’re worse off than last year because Russell+Cousins would be a more high usage duo than Kyrie+Horford

I do think Cousins will most likely sit out for most of the half of the season.

D'Lo will probably loosen his USG % rate, and lower his shot taking. He's always been an excellent passer on the bounce, and great decision maker. Plus being on the terrible Lakers team probably hindered his development.

I think he can bounce back.

We will probably go after D'Lo for sure though, we're lacking a PG, plus the four headed snake of Brown, Langford, D'Lo, and Smart will be awesome to watch.

I dont understand the "lacking a PG" argument.

We have marcus smart under contract as sell as the right to match any offers for Rozier. 

I count two PGs under Boston control eho have both proven they can start on a playoff team.

And Danny has always been extremely high on Rozier, while Rozier also indicated hed be happy to return to Boston if there was a starting role available.

I think the priority here is definitely the frontcourt.   Our starting center just walked in FA and we just traded our backup for nothing.

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #26 on: June 20, 2019, 11:08:49 PM »

Online Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8737
  • Tommy Points: 855
I'm more and more convinced that we're aiming to land Russell in free agency.

With Phoenix now looking to be out of the running for him, the reports that Brooklyn will not keep Russell if they get Kyrie - even only Kyrie - our suddenly significant cap room that we've cleared up, and the fact that Russell is seemingly a good fit with the Jays and our current timeline, I think it makes a ton of sense. A Russell, Brown, Tatum, Hayward, Williams lineup would be extremely fun to watch and would be perfectly built as a run-and-gun team, which we've unfortunately gotten away from in recent years. Then you have the Russell Instagram picture tonight of Romeo being picked by the C's.

The only question would be solidifying the bigs. Would love to just forcefeed Williams minutes, as I think he has a ton of potential if he gets the chance. If we clear maximal cap space and sign Russell to the max, that'd leave us around $6M - $7M left in cap space, I believe. Maybe we could bring in a Dedmon/Davis type player as a backup big off the bench, too.
Sign Russell and trade for Capella? Can they make that work money wise?
No

We’d need to renounce all the guys we’d sign and trade for Capela in order to clear space for Russell

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #27 on: June 20, 2019, 11:09:30 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
I'm more and more convinced that we're aiming to land Russell in free agency.

With Phoenix now looking to be out of the running for him, the reports that Brooklyn will not keep Russell if they get Kyrie - even only Kyrie - our suddenly significant cap room that we've cleared up, and the fact that Russell is seemingly a good fit with the Jays and our current timeline, I think it makes a ton of sense. A Russell, Brown, Tatum, Hayward, Williams lineup would be extremely fun to watch and would be perfectly built as a run-and-gun team, which we've unfortunately gotten away from in recent years. Then you have the Russell Instagram picture tonight of Romeo being picked by the C's.

The only question would be solidifying the bigs. Would love to just forcefeed Williams minutes, as I think he has a ton of potential if he gets the chance. If we clear maximal cap space and sign Russell to the max, that'd leave us around $6M - $7M left in cap space, I believe. Maybe we could bring in a Dedmon/Davis type player as a backup big off the bench, too.
Sign Russell and trade for Capella? Can they make that work money wise?

Hmm, not sure it could happen without adding Smart in there, which I'm not fond of. And it'd depend upon how much cap space we had left.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #28 on: June 20, 2019, 11:10:57 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
D'Lo and Cousins.

Russell could actually have a fantastic season like Irving did, improve his efficiency, and become more well rounded on defense and passing.

I think Ainge might actually take a stab at DMC, and run with both William's at the 5 in short spurts.

This allows Hayward to go from the 1 to 4 spots occasionally.

Maybe one of those guys but both?? Why? So much for handing the reins over to the J’s. Now they’re worse off than last year because Russell+Cousins would be a more high usage duo than Kyrie+Horford

I do think Cousins will most likely sit out for most of the half of the season.

D'Lo will probably loosen his USG % rate, and lower his shot taking. He's always been an excellent passer on the bounce, and great decision maker. Plus being on the terrible Lakers team probably hindered his development.

I think he can bounce back.

We will probably go after D'Lo for sure though, we're lacking a PG, plus the four headed snake of Brown, Langford, D'Lo, and Smart will be awesome to watch.

I dont understand the "lacking a PG" argument.

We have marcus smart under contract as sell as tge right to match any offers for Rozier. 

I count two PGs on this roster who have both proven they can start on a playoff team.

And Danny has always beem extremely high on Rozier, while Rozier also ibdocated hed be happy to return to Boston if there was a starting role.

I think the priority here is definitely the frontcourt.   Al starting center just walked in FA and we just traded our backup for nothing.

I seriously doubt Rozier is coming back, and if he does, it's to get S&T'ed to a team of his choice. He has burned too many bridges, and honestly even if he does bounce back, I seriously hope he gets it together, because this year was absolutely dreadful to watch.

As for front court, yeah sure, our front court is going to be small and limited. But I believe that's why Ainge is keeping cap space open to possibly be able to pull of FA deals for D'Lo, and maybe go after Adams or Capela.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Who are we clearing (max?) cap space for?
« Reply #29 on: June 20, 2019, 11:12:58 PM »

Offline PAOBoston

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8134
  • Tommy Points: 535
I'm more and more convinced that we're aiming to land Russell in free agency.

With Phoenix now looking to be out of the running for him, the reports that Brooklyn will not keep Russell if they get Kyrie - even only Kyrie - our suddenly significant cap room that we've cleared up, and the fact that Russell is seemingly a good fit with the Jays and our current timeline, I think it makes a ton of sense. A Russell, Brown, Tatum, Hayward, Williams lineup would be extremely fun to watch and would be perfectly built as a run-and-gun team, which we've unfortunately gotten away from in recent years. Then you have the Russell Instagram picture tonight of Romeo being picked by the C's.

The only question would be solidifying the bigs. Would love to just forcefeed Williams minutes, as I think he has a ton of potential if he gets the chance. If we clear maximal cap space and sign Russell to the max, that'd leave us around $6M - $7M left in cap space, I believe. Maybe we could bring in a Dedmon/Davis type player as a backup big off the bench, too.
Sign Russell and trade for Capella? Can they make that work money wise?
No

We’d need to renounce all the guys we’d sign and trade for Capela in order to clear space for Russell
That’s what I meant. Absorb Capella with caps space and then sign DLo with cap space.