Yes, for all the talk about free throws and jump shots, staying healthy in the playoffs has been a big problem for him as well.
I just think that when Rondo is at his best, his style of play is both dominant and unsustainable, and that's the biggest problem. In order for Rondo to play to his full potential he needs to totally sacrifice himself. That explains his maddening inconsistency at least as much as his purported moodiness.
I know this is beating the brittle skeleton of a long-dead horse at this point, but I think that the lack of sustainability is due in large part to Rondo's poor jumpshot. In order to score -- and sometimes even to create shots for teammates -- he has to sacrifice himself. He can't have a big impact while playing a low-impact style.
That's why I think it's fair to wonder, even if Rondo has two pristine knees and CP3 only has one, if CP3's game will actually age much better than Rondo's.
You make a good point here. However, I don't see Chris Paul forced to play a low impact style making a higher impact than Rajon Rondo able to play a high impact style.
Yes, we have to hope for good health from Rondo, but that's always the case with athletes. Rondo battled plantar fasciitis last season while Paul was recovering from knee surgery. There's, of course, a chance that Rondo will never fully recover from suffering from stinging pain in his feet, but history has shown that NBA players have a much higher rate of full recovery from this injury than getting reconstructed knees back to where they were.
Basically, in short, if we are tying up $20 million a year over the next four or five years for Chris Paul, I don't want him to turn out to be Chauncey Billups, a good, solid, competitive, smart guard with a jump shot who is not able to use his explosiveness on both ends of the floor to really create havoc. If that's the player we are getting, he'll undoubtedly be a good to great guard in this league a la the aforementioned Chauncey Billups, but he won't be the game changing, impact guy that everyone is expecting.
I'd rather take my chances that Rondo can be healthy and high impact for the foreseeable future. There are risks either way, but when are there not?