Author Topic: We aren't very good without Horford  (Read 7449 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: We aren't very good without Horford
« Reply #45 on: March 08, 2017, 05:39:55 PM »

Offline Chris22

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5081
  • Tommy Points: 460
Not a shocker that a rebuilding team would need their most expensive player.

What shocks me is how Danny hasn't filled in some of the problems relating to defense/rebounding down low.

They should have gone after Bogut or someone similar (Tyson Chandler).
Never heard of a rebuilding 2nd seed but ok...

This team is over achieving, and some of the east is under achieving.Washingtion should be better than us,and we should be on par or slightly worse than Toronto, but Lowery has been hurt.

We are in year 4 of the rebuild, not long for a team thats only had one of their picks in the lottery and just got a top 3 pick last year. IT was a huge surprise, and Horford signing with us as well. No way DA is even close to being done. No way this team is even close to being a contender.

Two ways to stop the rebuild. This summer either trade or sign 2 of three of, Butler/PG13/Hayward/Griffen. Then add solid bench players around them.

OR

Keep the next two Nets picks, move IT and Horford for picks or young players, and then develop.

So yeah, a rebuilding 2nd seed, it's rare to see, like Bigfoot. :)

I would actually argue we are in year 3 of building a team.  In year 1 we were building a tank.

Awesome.