The fundamental difference between JKJB and JTJB appears to be the question of what is a worthwhile return for him. Most of the JTJB crow would be happy to see us move JB, Schröder, filler and picks for an elite PG like Lillard or Dejounte Murray, either of whom would clearly be a better fit with Tatum (yes, Lillard is older than JB, but his basketball IQ is off the charts, he’s clutch in the playoffs, and he’s a top ten player for those of us who pay attention to the western conference, too). Yes, we would not “win” either trade if winning is defined as absolutely robbing the other team, but trades can be win-win (and both parties clearly think they are when they agree to initiate the trade). There’s just nobody out there to fleece like the Nets circa 2013. That’s been the case for years, which is why we missed out on so many great opportunities in Ainge’s final years. It’s another reason why a lot of JTJB is eager to see us try something that is potentially better than the JT/JB sea of .500…
Here’s the deal: The data shows that Tatum and the team perform better without JB rather than with him. We’ve been mired in .500 territory for over 100 games post-Hayward, the current era of JT/JB without a true number three (Smart will never be the three in a Big 3). It does not make a lot of sense just keeping this arrangement unless it changes and very soon. After the past 100+ games, how much longer must be wait? Especially if Lillard may be available next month? JTJB.