Author Topic: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....  (Read 7336 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #30 on: May 07, 2018, 11:31:27 AM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
You know who I just thought of? Ron Arrest.

Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #31 on: May 29, 2018, 11:15:03 PM »

Offline rondofan1255

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4384
  • Tommy Points: 527
Smart reminds me of Draymond Green, but in a guard size. If you give him the opportunity to be able to distribute the ball more, I can certainly see him racking up 5-7 APG next year.

Same. Except with a worse shot and more of a chucker.

Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #32 on: May 29, 2018, 11:16:35 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
You know who I just thought of? Ron Arrest.
I wish. Rob Artest was on his way to becoming a top player in the league, averaging 25ppg with elite defence.

Marcus is nothing like Ron on offence sadly
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #33 on: May 30, 2018, 01:14:26 PM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Sam Jones
  • **********************
  • Posts: 22098
  • Tommy Points: 1776
If he’s Rodman, then he needs to recognize that not every shot is a good shot. Rodman shot above 50% for his career because he knew his limitations.

same thing applies to rozier. terrible decision making shooting wise. both have a long way to go BBIQ wise.
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #34 on: May 30, 2018, 01:23:40 PM »

Offline PickNRoll

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1691
  • Tommy Points: 199
Effort: Rodman
Defense: DJ
Shot selection: Josh Smith
Hustle: Bird
Finishing touch: Acres/Kite
Defensive IQ: 98
Offensive IQ: 60
Boneheaded ppg: 3
Winning ppg: 8.5
NFL: strong safety
NBA life expectancy o/u: 9.5yrs

Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #35 on: May 30, 2018, 02:24:15 PM »

Offline wiley

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4855
  • Tommy Points: 386
Why do people compare Marcus to guys who behaved like thugs when they were on the floor.
Marcus actually helps opponents up off the floor in a very sincere manner.  He is a high character guy who admits his mistakes and plays hard all the time.  I forgot who he was compared to last week but it was another guy with a history of cheap shots...I just don't get it.

Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #36 on: May 30, 2018, 03:11:39 PM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
He reminds me of Trump.
Smart insists he can shoot but can't.
Trump insists he is smart but he's not! ;)

Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #37 on: May 30, 2018, 06:10:07 PM »

Offline hodgy03038

  • NCE
  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3820
  • Tommy Points: 461
He reminds me of Trump.
Smart insists he can shoot but can't.
Trump insists he is smart but he's not! ;)

Smart is a hard worker and a team player.

Trump hasn't worked a day in his life and is a narcissist.

They do both like the women though.  :P


Re: I get it now. The NBA equivalent of Marcus Smart is.....
« Reply #38 on: May 30, 2018, 06:19:54 PM »

Offline libermaniac

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2962
  • Tommy Points: 387
You know who I just thought of? Ron Arrest.
Was that typo intentional Ron "Arrest" since he's a thug, or just a Freudian slip?