I always have to laugh at the dumb, reactionary hot takes after a close, tough loss.
There isn’t anything “hot takey” about saying our stars, especially Horford, played like poo tonight and were fundamental in us coughing up the game; it’s legitimately empirically verified in the stats. It’s fairly difficult to have such low +/- numbers in a 3 point game.
Further, Al has been garbage ever since the ASB, distancing this critique even more from a “hot take.”

You're also the person who continually dismisses the Rockets for no apparent reason.
Hard to take anything you say seriously.
Lol! Where to start?
A) Perhaps you should look up what a "hot take" really is, because I just laid out for you exactly why it's not a "hot take." It's kind of strange and illogical to use language and concepts if you don't know what they mean...
B)This is me "continuously dismissing the Rockets for no apparent reason:"
Yikes! The turnovers! That’ll kill us.
These Rockets are legit title contenders though. They’re not going to beat themselves. C’s gotta show what they’re made of tonight.
I still don't buy them getting past the Warriors. Their style is just not conducive to beating a team like the Warriors four games out of seven.
What style? Top tier defense with an unstoppable offense? They’ve looked like a juggernaut as of late.
What style is conducive to beating the Warriors then?
Jacking up an inordinate amount of threes. It's that exact style that put them up 26 on us in Boston only to let us come back and win by one. They're not going to be able to make enough threes to win four games over GS in a seven game series.
So saying I don't think they can beat GS in a 7 game series is now somehow me "continuously dismissing the Rockets for no apparent reason."
Good job; good effort. But clearly that's an insane, illogical argument.
thanks for the good laugh
you still fail to make any good points, but keep trying
So, let's lay out this conversation thus far to see how ridiculous this post truly is:
- First, you bemoan my "hot takes" regarding our stars' poor play tonight.
- I then respond to your post explaining in detail why exactly they are not "hot takes."
- You ignore that argument and sarcastically post an emoji in response. You then move on to a false characterization of my position on the Rockets and for whatever reason claim that I can't be taken seriously because of this false characterization of my position on the Rockets.
- In response I post exactly what I said about the Rockets and highlighted why that was a false characterization.
- Once again you sarcastically ignore the arguments, and then you have the audacity to state that I fail to make any good points and to keep trying, even though you have yet to even respond to a rebuttal.
Yikes, that's embarrassing.

Seems to me that this is simply a case of you having no rebuttal to me refuting your fallacious arguments, so you move to
ad hominems instead. You're better than that, KG's Knee.