Follow us on Twitter  

Author Topic: Bruins trade for Rick Nash  (Read 5326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« on: February 25, 2018, 09:49:56 AM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 41132
  • Tommy Points: -27172
  • 33,333 posts and counting . . .
Quote
The New York Rangers have traded six-time All-Star forward Rick Nash to the Boston Bruins, the Rangers announced Sunday.

The Rangers will receive forwards Ryan Spooner and Matt Beleskey, prospect defenseman Ryan Lindgren, the Bruins' 2018 first-round draft pick and a 2019 seventh-round pick.

I love that they’re going for it.  He’s on the downside of his career, but he’ll help.
Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat. CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012.

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2018, 09:52:42 AM »

Online Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Bob Cousy
  • **************************
  • Posts: 26252
  • Tommy Points: 1240
  • What a Pub Should Be
This could be a really fun spring ahead with the Bruins & Celtics.

B’s are definitely going for it, huh?


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2018, 10:01:04 AM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6739
  • Tommy Points: 148
That is a honest move to go for it. Not sure it's enough though.

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2018, 10:22:04 AM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14168
  • Tommy Points: 1326
  • On To Banner 18!
Am I the only one who thinks this is a pretty big overpay?

5 assets including 1st rounder, Spooner and another solid prospect for a pure rental?

I mean yeah, it's nice to get rid of 50% Beleskey's salary, and maybe Nash does help in the playoffs, but it still seems risky.
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2018, 10:25:16 AM »

Offline esel1000

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9346
  • Tommy Points: 442
Am I the only one who thinks this is a pretty big overpay?

5 assets including 1st rounder, Spooner and another solid prospect for a pure rental?

I mean yeah, it's nice to get rid of 50% Beleskey's salary, and maybe Nash does help in the playoffs, but it still seems risky.

Spooner was a FA and they get out of at least part of Belesky’s awful contract. A bit of an overpay but in the scheme of things I don’t think it’s that bad.

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2018, 10:26:03 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
That's an awful lot to give up (quantity if not quality) for someone who's going to hit free agency end of season and is already 33 anyway.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2018, 10:43:21 AM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
I don't know much about hockey. It seems he'll be one of the oldest on the team. Would it be likely for him to resign at reasonable money if the team does well?

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2018, 11:20:36 AM »

Offline TomHeinsohn

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 226
  • Tommy Points: 33
33 isn't terribly old for hockey

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2018, 02:42:59 PM »

Online nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 41277
  • Tommy Points: 8015
This is a great go for it all trade. The Bruins have all their draft picks for the next few years, they are extremely young, they have the best playing line and best playing goalie in the league, and could be looking at home ice advantage throughout the playoffs by having a great ending stretch. Love this trade.

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2018, 02:50:00 PM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14168
  • Tommy Points: 1326
  • On To Banner 18!
Bruins also signed Brian Gionta for $700,000.

I like that move. Very low risk with potentially high reward. Good veteran presence too, and I think that does matter more than people think (not saying it guarantees a championship, but I think we saw last year how much the B's missed that in some instances)

Although it's unlike with Nash who we had to trade five assets away for, and I'm really not sure he's that kind of "difference maker" that warrants that kind of trade. Is he a solid player? Absolutely. But still...
« Last Edit: February 25, 2018, 03:29:05 PM by Phantom255x »
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2018, 03:00:10 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 41132
  • Tommy Points: -27172
  • 33,333 posts and counting . . .
Bruins also signed Brian Gionta for $700,000.

I like that move. Very low risk with potentially high reward. Good veteran presence too, and I think that does matter more than people think (not saying it guarantees a championship, but I think we saw last year how much the C's missed that in some instances)

Although it's unlike with Nash who we had to trade five assets away for, and I'm really not sure he's that kind of "difference maker" that warrants that kind of trade. Is he a solid player? Absolutely. But still...

You’ve got to look at the “assets”, though:

* An inferior wing who is a restricted free agent
* A mediocre prospect defenseman
* A wing with negative trade value
* A late 1st rounder
* A 7th rounder

Spooner is the only asset that is likely to add anything to a team, and Nash is an upgrade.

This is the Bruins’ equivalent of “Yabu + #1 for Tyreke”. I’d still do that deal.
Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat. CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012.

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2018, 03:09:02 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
33 isn't terribly old for hockey
Well if you're Jaromir Jagr it's, like, the start of your prime?
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2018, 03:41:09 PM »

Online KGs Knee

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12040
  • Tommy Points: 1466
Bruins also signed Brian Gionta for $700,000.

I like that move. Very low risk with potentially high reward. Good veteran presence too, and I think that does matter more than people think (not saying it guarantees a championship, but I think we saw last year how much the C's missed that in some instances)

Although it's unlike with Nash who we had to trade five assets away for, and I'm really not sure he's that kind of "difference maker" that warrants that kind of trade. Is he a solid player? Absolutely. But still...

You’ve got to look at the “assets”, though:

* An inferior wing who is a restricted free agent
* A mediocre prospect defenseman
* A wing with negative trade value
* A late 1st rounder
* A 7th rounder

Spooner is the only asset that is likely to add anything to a team, and Nash is an upgrade.

This is the Bruins’ equivalent of “Yabu + #1 for Tyreke”. I’d still do that deal.


A late 1st Rd pick in the NHL is still a very valuable asset. Sure, it's not as valuable as a higher pick, but the difference in value between the beginning and end of the 1st round in the NHL is far different than what that difference would be in the NBA.

That said, I still like this deal for the Bruins. Nash is a proven veteran (but not too old) that could very well give the B's that extra push they need to win the Cup this year.

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2018, 03:48:54 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 41132
  • Tommy Points: -27172
  • 33,333 posts and counting . . .
Bruins also signed Brian Gionta for $700,000.

I like that move. Very low risk with potentially high reward. Good veteran presence too, and I think that does matter more than people think (not saying it guarantees a championship, but I think we saw last year how much the C's missed that in some instances)

Although it's unlike with Nash who we had to trade five assets away for, and I'm really not sure he's that kind of "difference maker" that warrants that kind of trade. Is he a solid player? Absolutely. But still...

You’ve got to look at the “assets”, though:

* An inferior wing who is a restricted free agent
* A mediocre prospect defenseman
* A wing with negative trade value
* A late 1st rounder
* A 7th rounder

Spooner is the only asset that is likely to add anything to a team, and Nash is an upgrade.

This is the Bruins’ equivalent of “Yabu + #1 for Tyreke”. I’d still do that deal.


A late 1st Rd pick in the NHL is still a very valuable asset. Sure, it's not as valuable as a higher pick, but the difference in value between the beginning and end of the 1st round in the NHL is far different than what that difference would be in the NBA.

That said, I still like this deal for the Bruins. Nash is a proven veteran (but not too old) that could very well give the B's that extra push they need to win the Cup this year.

Those picks still aren’t worth very much:

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/analyzing-value-nhl-draft-picks/

A late first rounder apparently isn’t worth all much more than a 3rd rounder.
Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat. CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012.

Re: Bruins trade for Rick Nash
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2018, 03:54:35 PM »

Online KGs Knee

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12040
  • Tommy Points: 1466
Bruins also signed Brian Gionta for $700,000.

I like that move. Very low risk with potentially high reward. Good veteran presence too, and I think that does matter more than people think (not saying it guarantees a championship, but I think we saw last year how much the C's missed that in some instances)

Although it's unlike with Nash who we had to trade five assets away for, and I'm really not sure he's that kind of "difference maker" that warrants that kind of trade. Is he a solid player? Absolutely. But still...

You’ve got to look at the “assets”, though:

* An inferior wing who is a restricted free agent
* A mediocre prospect defenseman
* A wing with negative trade value
* A late 1st rounder
* A 7th rounder

Spooner is the only asset that is likely to add anything to a team, and Nash is an upgrade.

This is the Bruins’ equivalent of “Yabu + #1 for Tyreke”. I’d still do that deal.


A late 1st Rd pick in the NHL is still a very valuable asset. Sure, it's not as valuable as a higher pick, but the difference in value between the beginning and end of the 1st round in the NHL is far different than what that difference would be in the NBA.

That said, I still like this deal for the Bruins. Nash is a proven veteran (but not too old) that could very well give the B's that extra push they need to win the Cup this year.

Those picks still aren’t worth very much:

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/analyzing-value-nhl-draft-picks/

A late first rounder apparently isn’t worth all much more than a 3rd rounder.

I think that study isn't worth a whole lot when they immediately throw out two of the most important positions in the game as part of the study.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2018, 04:01:58 PM by KGs Knee »