How exactly do these stats stack up in comparison to the team defense? I am not saying that Kyrie wasn't a bad defender, only that he was a bad defender on a bad defensive team that didn't give a care about defense. IT was a bad defender on a good defensive team that did care about defense.
I never expect Kyrie to be a top tier defender, but you have to admit his defensive floor is probably higher than IT's is, right?
Since Kyrie was a worse defender, no, his floor isn't lower.
I disagree that Kyrie was a worse defender.
First of all, Kyrie did not rank second last in the
entire NBA in Defensive Real Plus Minus - Thomas did.
But more importantly is the fact that Kyrie is actually CAPABLE of playing defence when he really wants to, he just doesn't. But the fact that he is at least capable of it suggests that there is some chance (however slim that may be) that if you can channel his defensive desire he might actually be able to improve on that end.
Isaiah Thomas simply is not capable of playing defence because his size just makes it impossible. It doesn't matter how hard he does / doesn't want it, he cannot play D and he will never be able to.
You can somewhat cover for Kyrie's defensive issues but IT's size mismatches create so many problems that you cannot cover for it without making major defensive sacrifices elsewhere. Jae Crowder and Avery Bradley spent half of their time on the court covering for Isaiah's defensive assignments. Irving sucks, but not that badly.