I think when analyzing the Nets pick v. Lakers pick people are debating too much how bad either team will be and who's going to be worse while that is just the most minor of issues when discussing the pick.
Neither team has any incentive to tank, so I'm doubtful that either end up as one of the bottom 2 teams in the league. Yes, I know Brooklyn had no incentive to tank last season and still ended up worst, but there were no tankers from day 1 last season and there are at least three this season.
Regardless if one team finishes 5th and the other 8th, they both have fairly short odds at getting a top 3 pick and it will come down to luck either way. Sure, its better to have better odds if your horse is 5th with a better consolation prize as well, but still, it's a crap shoot. And honestly, as much as you think you might know, you really have no clue which team will end up worse. (I'm leaning Brooklyn)
The big difference in the two picks is the protection on the LAL pick. The brooklyn pick has the chance to be #1 overall, which is a shot at a transcendent talent in this upcoming draft. This is the kind of draft that teams will tank out of the playoffs just to get some ping pong balls for a shot at. With Brooklyn, the full spectrum of odds are in play. With LAL, there are so many combinations of scenarios were this pick doesn't convey and then we get it in 2019 which is looking like a weaker draft.
That LAL #1 protection alone is the only factor for me in evaluating the picks because its the only certainty we know of. So I think the Brooklyn pick is considerably better and I'm bummed we gave it away instead of the LAL. If we get lucky, great, but I think the odds were more on our side with the Brooklyn pick.