0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
He will do fine as a 3rd string guard. Strong defensive talent. Very limited offensively. Will do fine next to better players. I like K.Allen better than Demetrious Jackson for this team because I think a defensive combo guard is more valuable roster wise than another ball-handler -- 3 of them already in Isaiah, Rozier, Smart so no need for a 3rd string PG.
Quote from: Who on July 11, 2017, 08:05:38 AMHe will do fine as a 3rd string guard. Strong defensive talent. Very limited offensively. Will do fine next to better players. I like K.Allen better than Demetrious Jackson for this team because I think a defensive combo guard is more valuable roster wise than another ball-handler -- 3 of them already in Isaiah, Rozier, Smart so no need for a 3rd string PG.We can keep both. On a two-way deal, Allen could be on the Celtics roster for at least 45 days -- barring catastrophic injury, we aren't going to need a third guard of his ilk more than that amount of time. Jackson can continue to develop as a PG in the meantime. With both IT and Smart hitting free agency, continuing to develop Jackson this year could pay dividends next year.
Quote from: saltlover on July 11, 2017, 12:29:55 PMQuote from: Who on July 11, 2017, 08:05:38 AMHe will do fine as a 3rd string guard. Strong defensive talent. Very limited offensively. Will do fine next to better players. I like K.Allen better than Demetrious Jackson for this team because I think a defensive combo guard is more valuable roster wise than another ball-handler -- 3 of them already in Isaiah, Rozier, Smart so no need for a 3rd string PG.We can keep both. On a two-way deal, Allen could be on the Celtics roster for at least 45 days -- barring catastrophic injury, we aren't going to need a third guard of his ilk more than that amount of time. Jackson can continue to develop as a PG in the meantime. With both IT and Smart hitting free agency, continuing to develop Jackson this year could pay dividends next year.You can only have 2 players on two-way deals, though, so there's a choice to be made there.
Bird may be better although I don't think he fills the need that Allen does
I think Bird is not going to stick. He doesn't seem to contribute an NBA skill like Allen does with his ball-hawking
Quote from: kozlodoev on July 11, 2017, 12:40:13 PMQuote from: saltlover on July 11, 2017, 12:29:55 PMQuote from: Who on July 11, 2017, 08:05:38 AMHe will do fine as a 3rd string guard. Strong defensive talent. Very limited offensively. Will do fine next to better players. I like K.Allen better than Demetrious Jackson for this team because I think a defensive combo guard is more valuable roster wise than another ball-handler -- 3 of them already in Isaiah, Rozier, Smart so no need for a 3rd string PG.We can keep both. On a two-way deal, Allen could be on the Celtics roster for at least 45 days -- barring catastrophic injury, we aren't going to need a third guard of his ilk more than that amount of time. Jackson can continue to develop as a PG in the meantime. With both IT and Smart hitting free agency, continuing to develop Jackson this year could pay dividends next year.You can only have 2 players on two-way deals, though, so there's a choice to be made there.Right, two of Allen, Nader, and Bird. Assuming Nader gets a 2-way deal, I think one of Allen and Bird do, and the other is signed to a Maine only contract like Nader last year. But again, barring Jackson getting completely beaten out in training camp, I expect to see him on the roster come opening night.
QuoteBird may be better although I don't think he fills the need that Allen doesDo you still think this after the last two summer league games, from what I seen Bird plays D, shoots and hustles.QuoteI think Bird is not going to stick. He doesn't seem to contribute an NBA skill like Allen does with his ball-hawkingHe has outperformed Allen every game, so what are you basing this on ? A hunch ? I think Bird will get a 2 way contract at the least.