I originally posted this in another thread, but I see at lot of people misunderstand Isaac's game and potential, so I'm going to repost it here:
I love Isaac, but comparing him to Kevin Durant is so unbelievably irresponsible. Isaac is a low-usage, do-it-all role player. He should be able to be absolutely elite defensively, elite on the boards, a capable catch-and-shoot threat in the half court, and a terror running the floor. He is NOT a take-over-the-game, impose-your-will superstar. If you insist on making an upside comparison, you're picking the wrong Warrior; Isaac is far more comparable, as a superstar role player, to Draymond Green than Kevin Durant. Isaac is an outstanding prospect not because of his superstar upside, but despite it.
interesting. the comparison's I've heard of Isaac is to KG, not KD. this seems to be a comparable to what I've heard. I'd hope he'd become like KG-lite since he supposedly has the drive of Smart and Brown.
not sure I'd want him at 3 if Tatum and Jackson are still on the board (one of them certainly will be) though Tatum needs work on his D and physique while Jackson needs to develop a shot. I love Marcus but I really don't want another young player that has issues with their shooting like Jackson. Isaac may offer a bit of what both Tatum and Jackson offer but with more size (which we really need). wouldn't have to necessarily rely on Brooklyn sucking next year (which they will) to get that big man prospect.
You can speculate that the trade was designed to get a GOOD big man soon, either in this draft or 2018, or at worst in 2019. Between the two drafts, Ainge now has 3 "shots on goal" with lottery picks.
that IS the optimist's spin on things. I just have a bad gut feeling that extra pick won't be as good as anyone hopes for. I remain certain next year's Brooklyn pick will be top 8 (still leaning towards top 5 but getting 3 top 5 picks in 3 consecutive years would be probably a tad overly hopeful) but I suspect LA will have a pick worse than #6 next year since they have zero incentive to tank at all (no option of keeping their pick) and their team was on a pace to be late lottery before throwing in the towel this year.
Getting the better of the Philly/Sac pick in 2019 except if it's number one really bothers me. I can see Sac being bad enough to get their pick at #1 while Philly has improved enough in 2 years to crack the playoffs which leaves us with trading away #1 this year for #3 (if Danny even keeps it) and a pick somewhere between 15-18 in 2019 which MIGHT get us a player that could be an end-of-rotation player in a few years.
if their was no #1 protection for 2019, I'd feel almost ok with the trade.