Author Topic: I'd rather have Griffin  (Read 5515 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #15 on: June 15, 2017, 06:30:28 PM »

Offline Bucketgetter

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1227
  • Tommy Points: 11
Im 100% with Erik on this one. If we sign Hayward for the max, who does everyone think our starting power forward will be? We already have a huge logjam at the 1-3, no need to add to it when there is another great free agent who plays a position of need and fits our scheme perfectly. If we sign Hayward we will have 8 guys who deserve minutes at the 1-3. That’s way too many and just a poor use of resources. If Griffin’s medical records check out and none of his injuries are chronic, I’d much rather have Griffin.
CB Mock Deadline - Minnesota Timberwolves
Kemba Walker / Tyus Jones / Aaron Brooks
Jimmy Butler / Jamal Crawford / Treveon Graham
Rodney Hood / Nic Batum / Marcus Georges Hunt
Taj Gibson / Nemanja Bjelica / Jonas Jerebko
KAT / Derrick Favors / Cole Aldrich
Picks - 2018 CHA 1st (Lotto protected), none out

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2017, 06:40:10 PM »

Offline Erik

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1649
  • Tommy Points: 235
  • The voice of reason
OK I think I did a poor job explaining one of my points. I completely agree that Hayward is a better player than Crowder. I don't know if Crowder could pull off the same stuff that Hayward does for Utah. But I think that if we move Hayward to Boston, he's going to be filling pretty much the same role as Crowder. We're still going to run the IT/Horford PnR and instead of passing it to an open Crowder, it will be an open Hayward who can shoot or drive. Maybe his FG% increases being wide open, maybe not. All I'm saying is don't expect there to be many situations where we put Hayward into 1v1 ISO. That's just not our offense. I'd rather have Crowder doing his thing and have Blake Griffin ready to take a lob after the 1/5 PnR or cleaning up some boards with putbacks.

If I'm Ainge, the first phone call goes to Blake. If he says no then we can consider Hayward, IMO.

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2017, 07:02:21 PM »

Offline safecracker

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 88
  • Tommy Points: 14
  • JJ8
The story with the Celtics has been that they only have one guy who can create his own shot. Hayward can, whereas Jag can't. It's reasonable to believe that CBS wouldn't just plug in Hayward for Jae and continue on the same path; he would surely adjust to accommodate a second scorer.
Having said that, I agree that the price tag for the upgrade is high, and that a productive big would be a better investment.

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2017, 07:17:15 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
Because of his ability to create his own shot, Hayward takes many more shots than Crowder. He has more shots available to him period. By you saying his shooting percentage is the same as Crowder you're making the point that Hayward is the more valuable scorer. He has a much better handle, more size, he's a better passer, he's a much more of a complete player.

Crowder is a nice 3 and D player, with a good contract. He's not really valuable at much else. He is know where near a "go to" scorer.

Now to Griffin...I'd love to have the version of Griffin 4 years ago, I'd even settle for the 2017 version. Although EVERYONE agrees his game is aging quickly. I just don't want to tie-up all that money and have him play 50 games a year.

 

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2017, 07:32:57 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
OK I think I did a poor job explaining one of my points. I completely agree that Hayward is a better player than Crowder. I don't know if Crowder could pull off the same stuff that Hayward does for Utah. But I think that if we move Hayward to Boston, he's going to be filling pretty much the same role as Crowder. We're still going to run the IT/Horford PnR and instead of passing it to an open Crowder, it will be an open Hayward who can shoot or drive. Maybe his FG% increases being wide open, maybe not. All I'm saying is don't expect there to be many situations where we put Hayward into 1v1 ISO. That's just not our offense. I'd rather have Crowder doing his thing and have Blake Griffin ready to take a lob after the 1/5 PnR or cleaning up some boards with putbacks.

If I'm Ainge, the first phone call goes to Blake. If he says no then we can consider Hayward, IMO.
Um, no.  The reason Jae plays the role that he plays is because he is an average offensive player.  Hayward much better and would earn a much bigger role.  That's the whole point.  And to the earlier comment about stats there is a reason for the expression, "lies, [dang] lies, and statistics".  In the wrong hand, stats are dangerous.  One could use stats to prove nearly any point they want to prove. 

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2017, 07:38:31 PM »

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
Me too.

Me three.  I think he wouldn't cost the max too.

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #21 on: June 15, 2017, 07:45:13 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37807
  • Tommy Points: 3030
if griffin is heathly he is clearly more of what we need ....IF we draft Fultz

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2017, 08:06:49 PM »

Offline Chris22

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5081
  • Tommy Points: 460
Fultz, Brown, Crowder, Horford, and Griffin.
I kind of like that lineup.

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #23 on: June 15, 2017, 08:09:49 PM »

Offline tstorey_97

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3667
  • Tommy Points: 586
And if Blake comes here our New England Kia dealers will be overjoyed...I prefer Griffin, but why would he come here? He's a freaking movie star who lives in LA.

If Fultz is drafted and Hayward is signed you surely have enough extra guys for some playing time drama.

If Crowder is your first guy off the bench? You are probably a championship contender or, at least closer to being one than you were this season.


Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #24 on: June 15, 2017, 08:23:20 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63151
  • Tommy Points: -25462
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
« Last Edit: June 15, 2017, 08:28:59 PM by Roy H. »


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2017, 08:28:26 PM »

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
Me too.

Me three.  I think he wouldn't cost the max too.

Why?

Same reason everyone here doesn't want him - he has had 2 consecutive season ending injuries.

I should have said that there is a chance you could get him less than the max, same as I now feel for IT.

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2017, 09:36:44 PM »

Offline flybono

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1025
  • Tommy Points: 49
Crowder vs Cleveland = one word. Invisible!

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2017, 10:34:45 PM »

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
Im 100% with Erik on this one. If we sign Hayward for the max, who does everyone think our starting power forward will be? We already have a huge logjam at the 1-3, no need to add to it when there is another great free agent who plays a position of need and fits our scheme perfectly. If we sign Hayward we will have 8 guys who deserve minutes at the 1-3. That’s way too many and just a poor use of resources. If Griffin’s medical records check out and none of his injuries are chronic, I’d much rather have Griffin.
Luckily they invented a transaction called a trade in which one team can swap players and picks with another team for their players and picks! Since we are drafting fultz, rozier/bradley/bradley will almost certainly be gone and probably flipped for frontcourt held.

Griffin is the next stoudemire situation. Guy has has way to many major surgeries to waste 1/3 of our cap on.

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2017, 10:40:49 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8744
  • Tommy Points: 856
Im 100% with Erik on this one. If we sign Hayward for the max, who does everyone think our starting power forward will be? We already have a huge logjam at the 1-3, no need to add to it when there is another great free agent who plays a position of need and fits our scheme perfectly. If we sign Hayward we will have 8 guys who deserve minutes at the 1-3. That’s way too many and just a poor use of resources. If Griffin’s medical records check out and none of his injuries are chronic, I’d much rather have Griffin.
Luckily they invented a transaction called a trade in which one team can swap players and picks with another team for their players and picks! Since we are drafting fultz, rozier/bradley/bradley will almost certainly be gone and probably flipped for frontcourt held.

Griffin is the next stoudemire situation. Guy has has way to many major surgeries to waste 1/3 of our cap on.
Stoudemire was way too reliant on athleticism. Blake has become a very skilled player.

Re: I'd rather have Griffin
« Reply #29 on: June 15, 2017, 10:50:53 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8076
  • Tommy Points: 615
Im 100% with Erik on this one. If we sign Hayward for the max, who does everyone think our starting power forward will be? We already have a huge logjam at the 1-3, no need to add to it when there is another great free agent who plays a position of need and fits our scheme perfectly. If we sign Hayward we will have 8 guys who deserve minutes at the 1-3. That’s way too many and just a poor use of resources. If Griffin’s medical records check out and none of his injuries are chronic, I’d much rather have Griffin.
Luckily they invented a transaction called a trade in which one team can swap players and picks with another team for their players and picks! Since we are drafting fultz, rozier/bradley/bradley will almost certainly be gone and probably flipped for frontcourt held.

Griffin is the next stoudemire situation. Guy has has way to many major surgeries to waste 1/3 of our cap on.
Stoudemire was way too reliant on athleticism. Blake has become a very skilled player.

Yep, anyone who watched Griffin this season will point out that he do not play with burst anymore. He have now extended his range and his offensive game now relies more on footwork than sheer athleticism.

With that said, I'm still wary of his injury. He could have been the difference maker in the Jazz series but goes down after game 2.

The OP is reaching with Crowder. Yes wing players are valuable in this age of small ball. But he doesn't provide any elite skills to prefer him over Hayward. His shooting is suspect, especially in the playoffs. Getting blown by in his defensive assignments on a consistent basis and completely disappears when his shots are not falling.