If I had to pick between Hayward and Griffin, I'd rather have Griffin.
For two reasons:
1) Jae Crowder.
I'm honestly puzzled that our fans are so blatantly disrespectful towards someone as good as Jae Crowder. I read a thread here that people were in agreement that if we sign Hayward and Crowder is upset, we move him. What?
Let me point out a few things: Jae Crowder played just as well as Gordon Hayward offensively this year, and much better defensively. If the Celtics sign Hayward, Jae Crowder is most likely gone, most likely for a future first round draft pick.
Let's look first at shooting the ball:
Player | FG% | 3P% | 2P% | FT% | TS% |
Hayward | 47.1% | 39.8% | 50.6% | 84.4% | 59.5% |
Crowder | 46.3% | 39.8% | 54% | 81.1% | 62.8% |
Percentage wise, it's a statistical wash.
Where Hayward shines is due to
usage. He's the #1 option on his team. While an argument can be made that people focus more on him as the #1 option, it's obvious that he would not be putting up the same usage numbers in Boston as he did in Utah, on a much more stacked team. It's the Chris Bosh / Kevin Love effect.
Let's now look at Real Plus Minus
Player | ORPM | DRPM | RPM | WINS |
Hayward | 3.14 | -0.08 | 3.06 | 9.45 |
Crowder | 2.20 | 1.69 | 3.89 | 10.52 |
Finally, let's look at salary. Jae Crowder is locked in for 3 years for $21,917,475. That's $8,382,525 less than we will have to pay Hayward for one year. How much do we want to overpay? I think Crowder/Brown is great depth at SF already.
2) There is a common puzzle that you give 2 year olds. You hand them an object with a hole in it and the piece that completes it and see if they can figure it out.
We have a glaring hole in our lineup. It's at the PF position. Blake Griffin is a PF. Fill the hole.
The amount of upgrade Blake Griffin is to Amir Johnson compared to Gordon Hayward to Jae Crowder is absurd.