What's the use of scoring five points out of nothing and, in the next two possessions a turnover and an airball?
That's what I (and many) have been advocating for the whole year. He gives a lotm but he takes away a lot too. That's why we are not sure if he can get 30 M per year from a true contender or he is just a (very good) complement. I won't say a super Eddie House, this is exagerating, but maybe not as much as we thought.