0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
This does kind of p--- you off, though. How many of us have been calling to move Al to the C spot this series with JJ or KO next to him in order to bring Lopez out of the paint? He can't guard Al out there, and he's already nailed two threes over him. I wish we would've done this earlier. Our offense would've been so much better that way with much more spacing. Honestly, we should've done it all season long.This whole "Al at PF" non-sense has been dumb from the start.
Quote from: mr. dee on April 21, 2017, 07:23:38 PMQuote from: celticsclay on April 21, 2017, 07:22:10 PMQuote from: mr. dee on April 21, 2017, 07:20:28 PMKnowing this team, they would quickly squander this lead. Im not holding my breath.who hurt you?Bulls already clawing back.are they?
Quote from: celticsclay on April 21, 2017, 07:22:10 PMQuote from: mr. dee on April 21, 2017, 07:20:28 PMKnowing this team, they would quickly squander this lead. Im not holding my breath.who hurt you?Bulls already clawing back.
Quote from: mr. dee on April 21, 2017, 07:20:28 PMKnowing this team, they would quickly squander this lead. Im not holding my breath.who hurt you?
Knowing this team, they would quickly squander this lead. Im not holding my breath.
It's nice that we're winning. We're also shooting 70% from three. We can't settle for jumpers as we continue to build this lead.
Quote from: max215 on April 21, 2017, 07:32:14 PMIt's nice that we're winning. We're also shooting 70% from three. We can't settle for jumpers as we continue to build this lead.And they respond with two straight layups .
really Smart??
Quote from: max215 on April 21, 2017, 07:33:38 PMQuote from: max215 on April 21, 2017, 07:32:14 PMIt's nice that we're winning. We're also shooting 70% from three. We can't settle for jumpers as we continue to build this lead.And they respond with two straight layups .The 3s open up the floor!