I'm almost a bit concerned about how good his shooting numbers have been lately. This efficiency is clearly not sustainable and we should temper our expectations and be accepting when he inevitably goes into a shooting slump instead of grumbling about how he's "regressed."
His form looks really good and he's not taking bad shots now (which affected his numbers early on). No reason to think he can't keep knocking down open looks like he has been. Sure, he'll have cold streaks from outside.
I'm surprised by his shooting just based on the scouting report of him in college as a non-shooter. But everything I've seen of him this year indicates he can be a plus shooter in the league. What's with his free throws, though?
That's the thing, his free throw numbers are terrible yet he's making a ridiculously high percentage from three. I accept that he's gotten better at shooting, but you have to assume that one of those numbers is an aberration and I don't think it's the free throws.
Why can't his low free throw % be an aberration? His shooting stroke looks good.
As I stated, if Brown had simply hit 4 more free throws this year, just 4, we wouldn't be having this discussion because he wouldn't be called a poor free throw shooter. People are making decisions on his shooting of free throws based on the ridiculously small sample size of 93 FTAs in his career.
Then you cant talk about any numbers.
Brown was a bad free throw shooter (on decent sample size) and a bad three point shooter(smallish sample size) in college.
He comes to the pros and in two sets of small sample sizes hes been solid form 3 and bad from the stripe, so really you cant make any conclusion, but if youd have to pick the number thats probably an aberration, Id pick his recent lights out shooting from deep.
Actually I am not ready to label him a great or poor shooter from either length because of the small sample size. And I don't tend to pay attention to any college or high school stats because about the only one that seems to consistently transfer to NBA level results is rebounding and even then its not a given. I prefer the eye test when it comes to shooting. His form seems fluid and square and he appears to take the shot with confidence. I can see him becoming a very good overall shooter. Like you said, neither sample size is large enough to determine his ability to be labeled good or bad right now. From either shot.
Im with you.
The eye test has been very kind to Jaylen this year. Im excited.
Agree with the last two posters. I believe Jaylen will be a stud in about two years. Anticipating major strides before next season. I'm passing on Butler every day of the week for what it seems like it would cost to get him.
I hope we go after Griffin hard in the off season.Would be happy with any of the 'top 15' free agents. If we don't bring in a big, I expect Zizic to start.
Early in the season I was all about Fultz, now I question his tenacity and could see him bailing after his rookie contract. Now I'm thinking more Ball,Jackson, Isaac.