have there been any high resolution close up replays?

.PDF warning http://official.nba.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2017/02/L2M-BOS-CHI-02-16-17.pdf

I think they are wrong but they also say Horford was fouled on the last shot. So yeah, we are not getting this one back. A shame...

Quote from: 317 on February 17, 2017, 05:46:12 PM

have there been any high resolution close up replays?

.PDF warning http://official.nba.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2017/02/L2M-BOS-CHI-02-16-17.pdf

I think they are wrong but they also say Horford was fouled on the last shot. So yeah, we are not getting this one back. A shame...

No, they don't. The play is described as "correct no call".

Yeah, sorry, but that's not a foul, or at least not one that should've been called. And that's been pretty much unanimously agreed upon across the sports world today.

Keep on protecting your incompetent refs, NBA! 

"Protecting the Shield," "Protecting the Logo" ... When is someone gonna start protecting the product and the fans?

There was definitely contact but not nearly enough to warrant a foul, as far as I can tell.

If that happens in the Garden, Tommy pulls a gun and shoots the official.

No doubt.

No thats murder and tommy would be jailed for along time I highly doubt that would happen, what made you come to such an unrealistic conclusion?

Obviously people here disagree but I thought it was a foul.  In fact, it's pretty obvious it was a foul.  So I have no problems with the call.

And frankly, hitting a shooter's elbow is a more egregious violation than many other plays with much more contact.  It's a no brainer kind of call and not one where you can reasonably expect the shooter to recover from.  I've had my elbow hit on shots and basically, you're pretty much done.

Now one can argue that they shouldn't call it in that instance.  I don't agree, especially for that kind of play, but you can argue it I guess.  Either way, who am I to complain about a correct call. 

Obviously people here disagree but I thought it was a foul.  In fact, it's pretty obvious it was a foul.  So I have no problems with the call.

And frankly, hitting a shooter's elbow is a more egregious violation than many other plays with much more contact.  It's a no brainer kind of call and not one where you can reasonably expect the shooter to recover from.  I've had my elbow hit on shots and basically, you're pretty much done.

Now one can argue that they shouldn't call it in that instance.  I don't agree, especially for that kind of play, but you can argue it I guess.  Either way, who am I to complain about a correct call.

He never touched his elbow. All the replays confirm there was no skin contact. The play was a "guess" that there was contact because it was so close and mostly because they are protecting their star. If that was James Young shooting the ball and Butler was defending would there be a call? I didn't think so.

It's water under the bridge and we should have played better and some of our guys like "Kelly" should have hit his free throws. 50% is not acceptable.

Next time we play them we kill them.