http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2691917-nba-trade-deadline-2017-br-staff-pre-all-star-trade-deadline-predictionsIt's in #12 on this list, and there are a ton of other predictions of trades/non-trades for other teams
(ex. Ibaka to Toronto, Nurkic staying put, Brook Lopez staying put, Carmelo joining the Clippers, etc.). But they argue that, and I quote:
But the probable cost—both this year and next year's Brooklyn Nets' picks, plus two of Jae Crowder, Avery Bradley and Marcus Smart—is far too steep.
By forfeiting those assets, the Celtics marginally improve but still fall short against the Cavaliers. They'd also surrender this summer's cap space and, quite possibly, a new franchise player.
If they make this trade and Butler, Isaiah Thomas and Al Horford aren't good enough to beat Cleveland, let alone whoever emerges from the Western Conference, what options does Boston then have to improve and win it all?
This is pretty much what I've been saying around here, but some people think my logic is completely flawed.
I would be perfectly fine with trade talks for PG13 or Butler around Draft Day, but now I think the prices are astronomically high and won't help us beat Cleveland still (maybe it gets us to the ECF, but even that's an "if" - have to get past Toronto who could possibly add Ibaka).
Maybe this can turn into the situation with the Red Sox (I know, I know, different sports), where they spent years hoping for Sale but the price was astronomically high, but then the White Sox lowered their price as they realized they needed to rebuild and the RS pounced. Maybe this summer, the Bulls FO realizes that?
EDIT: Sorry I think this wasn't the thread to post it under. Move it if necessary Mods. Thanks!