That article is solid and why there is a debate whether or not to resign him at $30 million/per year if he maintains this excellence.
Yes, get rid of the three guard stuff. Just say no.
Yes, we could use a nice center.
As for rebounding, we seem to be doing much better the last several games. So it is obvious the C's are aware it has been a problem. An added big who can rebound, block shots and fit in with Horford, Olynyk and Amir could help to hide Isaiah's height.
Isaiah is clearly better than other little guys such as Nate Robinson, but there is still a trade off for him being the main cog. The article articulates that. The writer doesn't say it can't work out, but he clearly implies that the do nothing approach would be fool's gold.
One thing Isaiah does do well is eat up minutes. We'd be lost without him without another decent point guard to pair with Marcus. The biggest problem with Isaiah might not be his height, but that a future contract would take up too much cap space. The article clearly shows that the other players are doing some of Isaiah's work. It's not his fault he's so short, but it's something to consider. It's why waiters take care of the busboys. It's about team. Other teams look like failures because they have their divas like Butler and Wade. Those kind of teams lack chemistry.
I'm not Danny. I have no clue what he's thinking. And Isaiah is signed through next year anyway. It's too early to worry about too much.