WCS and Mclemore to Celtics trade idea

[Tr1boy]

To Sac: Zeller,  Rozier, Young, 2nd round picks
To Celts: WCS, Mclemore, Collison

 Yay or nay?

[timriffic]

i don't think sac would part with collison for that package

[chilidawg]

So from Sacramento's perspective, WCS,Collison and McClemore for essentially Rozier?  Can't imagine they'd think that was a good idea.  Great trade for the Celtics though.

[tazzmaniac]

I don't see why the Kings would make that trade.  They're trying to win now.  Giving up Collison, their starting PG, makes them worse and therefore more likely to lose Cousins.  The Sixers have a pick swap option so tanking this year doesn't buy the Kings much. 


I don't see why we'd make the trade either.  WCS doesn't help our rebounding problem and might even make it worse.  Collison would make our backup PG spot better this year but it wouldn't make much of a difference.  Collison will be an UFA and McClemore (6M cap hold) will be a RFA .  I really wouldn't want to pay much to retain them so they'd walk.  It would end up being WCS for Rozier and a couple 2nds.  I'd rather have Rozier and a couple 2nds.   

[Tr1boy]

So from Sacramento's perspective, WCS,Collison and McClemore for essentially Rozier?  Can't imagine they'd think that was a good idea.  Great trade for the Celtics though.

Look at WCS and Mclemore mins these days. They are bench warmers.  Fallen out of favor

And yes Rozier would be an upgrade at the pg position for Sac

[Tr1boy]

Collison is also a FA after this season

This is a possible good trade for everyone involved (change of scenery)

Wcs and Mclemore are def stuck in Sac

[Surferdad]

McLemore may be the best player in that trade.  Take him out and Sac might go for it.

[Tr1boy]

McLemore may be the best player in that trade.  Take him out and Sac might go for it.

Im ok with that. But BM is a bench warmer right now. Contract up soon

[DefenseWinsChamps]

I'd rather have the uber-competitive Rozier than the under-competitive WCS and McLemore.

I think Rozier's competitiveness will help him over-acheive in his career, and will help his team win games. WCS and McLemore, on the other hand, will always tease but rarely deliver, especially not in big games.

Besides, I think Rozier is a better shooter than McLemore.

[Tr1boy]

I'd rather have the uber-competitive Rozier than the under-competitive WCS and McLemore.

I think Rozier's competitiveness will help him over-acheive in his career, and will help his team win games. WCS and McLemore, on the other hand, will always tease but rarely deliver, especially not in big games.

Besides, I think Rozier is a better shooter than McLemore.

We already have smart. Tired of small ball

Plus danny will prob draft another rozier with the many many picks he has in his wallet

[DefenseWinsChamps]

I'd rather have the uber-competitive Rozier than the under-competitive WCS and McLemore.

I think Rozier's competitiveness will help him over-acheive in his career, and will help his team win games. WCS and McLemore, on the other hand, will always tease but rarely deliver, especially not in big games.

Besides, I think Rozier is a better shooter than McLemore.

We already have smart. Tired of small ball

Plus danny will prob draft another rozier with the many many picks he has in his wallet

I think Rozier is going to be a better offensive player than Smart.

That being said, I don't mind trading him. I just don't want to trade him for two Jeff Greens.

[Tr1boy]

I'd rather have the uber-competitive Rozier than the under-competitive WCS and McLemore.

I think Rozier's competitiveness will help him over-acheive in his career, and will help his team win games. WCS and McLemore, on the other hand, will always tease but rarely deliver, especially not in big games.

Besides, I think Rozier is a better shooter than McLemore.

We already have smart. Tired of small ball

Plus danny will prob draft another rozier with the many many picks he has in his wallet

I think Rozier is going to be a better offensive player than Smart.

That being said, I don't mind trading him. I just don't want to trade him for two Jeff Greens.

Ouch

But maybe under cbs WCS and BM could find their gamre

Just look at what happened to Jeremi Grant (76ers to OKC)

[DefenseWinsChamps]

I'd rather have the uber-competitive Rozier than the under-competitive WCS and McLemore.

I think Rozier's competitiveness will help him over-acheive in his career, and will help his team win games. WCS and McLemore, on the other hand, will always tease but rarely deliver, especially not in big games.

Besides, I think Rozier is a better shooter than McLemore.

We already have smart. Tired of small ball

Plus danny will prob draft another rozier with the many many picks he has in his wallet

I think Rozier is going to be a better offensive player than Smart.

That being said, I don't mind trading him. I just don't want to trade him for two Jeff Greens.

Ouch

But maybe under cbs WCS and BM could find their gamre

Just look at what happened to Jeremi Grant (76ers to OKC)

That's true. Maybe they could, but I don't have great hope that WCS and BM are anything more than Ryan Hollins and Wesley Johnson. Whereas I think Terry Rozier might be something like a Victor Oladipo.

I know people will disagree on my assessment of their talent, but you can see based on my valuations why I wouldn't make that trade.

Also, what about Jerami Grant?

[Csfan1984]

I agree too much from Kings. More fair to me would be

WCS and Casspi
for
Rozier, Jerekbo, Young, and a 1st (Grizz or Clippers).