So there is obviously a correlation under the Callipari regime between high end talent playing at Kentucky and not being on winning teams.
So the obvious talents who have yet been able to win meaningful games while still putting up numbers:
-Anthony Davis - Made the playoffs once, its all due to his teammates.
-KAT - still early obviously, very talented.
- Julius Randle- Until this year ( Lakers may still be young to actually win enough for the Playoffs)
-WCS
-Nerlens Noel
-Kanter (struggled, but Utah got better once he was moved)
-Brandon Knight - Had a few good years in Milwaukee but has struggled
-Cousins- beating a dead horse
-John Wall - made the playoffs once, putting up numbers on bad teams
People that have had success:
-Rondo - edit: played for a diff coach, thanks FWF. Arguably the most successful player out of Kentucky in the last few decade
-Patrick Patterson- good team around him
-Bledsoe- Up and down, but talented, pushed for playoffs for a few years
-MKG
Obviously it is still early for everyone from KAT to Booker, so the rest remains to be seen. But if you stop and look at the players from Kentucky over the last few years it is mostly top end talents putting up great to absurd numbers on terrible teams.
Is this just a function of being immensely talented one and done players that go early in the draft? Or is there something more going on here. Are these players learning things that make it hard to succeed in an NBA environment?
Open forum for your opinion. Lets keep the callouts to a minimum and try to have a thoughtful discussion on this topic. What do you wonderful people think?