0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
At this point, somebody on this Blog needs to step in and define the term "Rumor" for me. None of these 'rumors' ever look sourced to me. None of this is real media.
Quote from: rickyfan3.0... on August 01, 2016, 11:13:43 AMAt this point, somebody on this Blog needs to step in and define the term "Rumor" for me. None of these 'rumors' ever look sourced to me. None of this is real media.This one is sourced to a podcast from Zach Lowe and Marc Stein of ESPN. That said, I haven't listened to the podcast to determine how much is people spitballing ideas and how much is coming from their anon. sources.
Quote from: saltlover on August 01, 2016, 11:25:42 AMQuote from: rickyfan3.0... on August 01, 2016, 11:13:43 AMAt this point, somebody on this Blog needs to step in and define the term "Rumor" for me. None of these 'rumors' ever look sourced to me. None of this is real media.This one is sourced to a podcast from Zach Lowe and Marc Stein of ESPN. That said, I haven't listened to the podcast to determine how much is people spitballing ideas and how much is coming from their anon. sources.I listened to it yesterday all they said was that the 2 most likely teams to make a deal were Boston and Denver, Denver's been trying to get someone to bite on Faried, any team interested would likely consider Faried a bench player since his salary is now around 1st big off the bench level.Anything else was just connecting the dots...
Quote from: Evantime34 on August 01, 2016, 10:03:53 AMDoesn't make sense for the Celtics. If we can't trade for a star we want to have cap space to sign one next year. Faried's salary would prevent that.I agree with that but it would help our rebounding problem out, his contract is actually affordable now and I think him and Horford would work well together. Would suck to miss out on a free agent next year though if Hayward or Blake wanted to play here.
Doesn't make sense for the Celtics. If we can't trade for a star we want to have cap space to sign one next year. Faried's salary would prevent that.
Quote from: Celts Fan 508 on August 01, 2016, 10:15:32 AMQuote from: Evantime34 on August 01, 2016, 10:03:53 AMDoesn't make sense for the Celtics. If we can't trade for a star we want to have cap space to sign one next year. Faried's salary would prevent that.I agree with that but it would help our rebounding problem out, his contract is actually affordable now and I think him and Horford would work well together. Would suck to miss out on a free agent next year though if Hayward or Blake wanted to play here.the celtics ranked FIFTH in the nba last season is rebounds per game. which problem are you referring to please? https://www.teamrankings.com/nba/stat/total-rebounds-per-game
Quote from: hwangjini_1 on August 01, 2016, 11:41:31 AMQuote from: Celts Fan 508 on August 01, 2016, 10:15:32 AMQuote from: Evantime34 on August 01, 2016, 10:03:53 AMDoesn't make sense for the Celtics. If we can't trade for a star we want to have cap space to sign one next year. Faried's salary would prevent that.I agree with that but it would help our rebounding problem out, his contract is actually affordable now and I think him and Horford would work well together. Would suck to miss out on a free agent next year though if Hayward or Blake wanted to play here.the celtics ranked FIFTH in the nba last season is rebounds per game. which problem are you referring to please? https://www.teamrankings.com/nba/stat/total-rebounds-per-gameBut if you look at rebounding percentage, which takes into account both pace and the fact that Celtics games featured a lot of missed shots from both teams, they are 18th. They didn't get dominated on the boards (getting 49.4% of them), but it certainly wasn't a team strength, and there is certain room for improvement.
once again...look at the # of posts from the OP, and the news link URL.....says it all....not even going to waste my time
Quote from: saltlover on August 01, 2016, 11:47:50 AMQuote from: hwangjini_1 on August 01, 2016, 11:41:31 AMQuote from: Celts Fan 508 on August 01, 2016, 10:15:32 AMQuote from: Evantime34 on August 01, 2016, 10:03:53 AMDoesn't make sense for the Celtics. If we can't trade for a star we want to have cap space to sign one next year. Faried's salary would prevent that.I agree with that but it would help our rebounding problem out, his contract is actually affordable now and I think him and Horford would work well together. Would suck to miss out on a free agent next year though if Hayward or Blake wanted to play here.the celtics ranked FIFTH in the nba last season is rebounds per game. which problem are you referring to please? https://www.teamrankings.com/nba/stat/total-rebounds-per-gameBut if you look at rebounding percentage, which takes into account both pace and the fact that Celtics games featured a lot of missed shots from both teams, they are 18th. They didn't get dominated on the boards (getting 49.4% of them), but it certainly wasn't a team strength, and there is certain room for improvement.true. but i doubt CBS considers this to be as much a problems as an area for improvement.
Ko for Faried? No way. I still think KO will be a sixth man candidate . Bright future.