I'm looking for you to explain what you mean when you say "legitimate". It really isn't a complicated question.
I am looking for you to explain why you need me to do that. I want to know your intentions which you never made clear. It's not that complicated a question.
You could have just said you're not interested in this conversation and you would have saved both of us some bandwidth.
Then you shouldn't have said anything in the first place. Please tell me how the website isn't 'legitimate.'
I've got no idea what a "legitimate website" is, so I'm afraid I can't answer your question. Let's not go through that again.
Larbrd called it a tabloid (i.e. not legitimate). I called it legitimate. It's not that complicated to understand what was being said.
TP
Battle the negativity on this board.
There are to many "scoffers" on this board sometimes
Battle it all you want. Bottom line is the Blake Griffin rumor is fake according to every credible writer I've seen waste time on it. So don't pass out breathlessly waiting for a trade that is almost definitely not happening (at least not until closer to the deadline if it looks like Blake isn't returning).
These fake insiders have nothing to lose by posting about it on twitter. The credible ones are going to look like fools if the trade goes down despite several days of them saying, "This rumor is fake... nothing is happening... it's made up".
Also, still waiting for someone to share some proof that any of those oft-mentioned RealGM forum "insiders" have ever been right about anything. I've personally seen LBF and BfB proven wrong about multiple things.
Falsification test:
Which NBA insiders have you seen not be proven wrong about multiple things?
p.s. As for Simmons, I can easily imagine there being a standing "No Leaks Are to Ever Make Their Way to Bill Simmons" order within both front offices, out of precaution for secrecy or out of resentment for him personally.
Yeah maybe you're right. Maybe the leaks sneak past Simmons all the way to the 16 year old Rhode Island high schooler other, non-Simmons NBA insiders like a professional scout or NBA beat writer or high school buddy of a GM.
Fixed.
More like "get withheld from" rather than sneak past.
Simmons isn't some rumor spider whose web catches all the rumors flying around. He's a dude who's going to have a very predictable rolodex of finite good sources. Wouldn't be that hard to put a general kibosh or selective kibosh on his limited stream of insiders. How many players are on each roster? 15, more or less. How many agents are there for those players? 30 or so. How many people work in a front office? Whatever that is. Group email asking all to be careful to avoid giving news about anything at all or just one particular deal to Simmons or his circle. Voila. Simmons winds up out of the loop and is reduced to reading RealGM insiders and second-hand smoke of said rumors in mainstream media, just like the rest of us, and maybe he resents that. Maybe he resents such insiders for having access to things that've been quarantined from him even though they are clearly inferior analysts of the NBA. (Remind you of anyone? No? Just asking.) Maybe he's insecure about being a headline-making book-writing NBA pontificator who gets more and more disconnected from the pulse of the grapevine the more he spends his time developing content for profit to support his now extremely-comfortable lifestyle and humble-glossed huge ego.
Why would the source of the leaks embargo Simmons, but not Car Dealership guy, or whoever else is making up this nonsense? Don't you think that if there was any legitimacy here that Danny would find out who the leak was, and shut it down?
First, I think the Twitter "insiders" are total frauds.
Second: You pay attention to politics, the legal system, corporate PR. Right? Political campaigns, prosecutors, and executives try to control leaks in more than one way. Some leaks they want and make happen, some they don't want and try to undercut. Some things they want leaked, but only in a certain context. Deniability, you know? RealGM has a legit side, but like I said most of it is a message board full of randos waging half-assed groupthink wars, just like any other message board in the universe. It's a great place for an idea to make its way to league consciousness but still be seen as fundamentally dubious and therefore very easily deniable.
The problem might be (mind you, I'm just speculating about this, just like the Simmons thing, just hypothetical scenarios, but in my opinion still very plausible as a way to explain some curious things, more plausible than their opposite, the everything-is-bunk theory) that Smitty's info got to be too credible with the California/whale thing, the deniability was blown. It's interesting that the mods put out a call for another mod, and then some flaming
Edited. Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline. n00b shows up and ruins everything and drives Smitty's golden goose away, posting a stream of things any two or three of which near the end would've and should've gotten a "ballboy" like that insta-perma-banned, and yet was still allowed to post after costing the board a precious insider,
who is also a mod, even after
physically threatening people, which the mods saw and merely warned him about, which is mind-boggingly unusual. The conspiracy theorists among us should already be recklessly connecting the dots, lol, but I think it's actually pretty plausible that Smitty wanted out, and the mods as a group teamed up to give him an out by manufacturing a flame war, a flame war that would never in a trillion years be tolerated for one minute there these days.
I don't disagree with part of your point: Simmons breaks very, very few story, and doesn't seem overly well-connected within the organization. However, the team is notoriously tight-lipped. They're not going to be sharing their business with a bunch of random people seeking attention.
And, of course, the "tell" that this is fake is related to the huge volume of information this twit supposedly has. He's answering intimate details about the negotiations that is simply unprecedented in sports reporting. Well, that and the fact that absolutely nothing he's reported has come true so far.
Forget the Twitter twits.
Did you read the huge volume of Smitty's information in that one single post I linked to?