Author Topic: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?  (Read 5135 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2016, 01:35:12 PM »

Offline heyvik

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2163
  • Tommy Points: 77
One plus is Crowder can play the 3 and 4.

Butler is a 2 but can play 3 for stretches.

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #16 on: July 07, 2016, 01:37:11 PM »

Offline CelticsBR

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 388
  • Tommy Points: 35
Butler is a top 10 scorer and top 10 defender.

Jae is a role player scorer and a top 10 defender.

As others have said, Butler's ability to create his own shot and get to the rim/free throw line are what make him a far superior upgrade to Crowder.

One is a role player, and one is arguably a top 10 NBA player given the strength of his two way game.

Curry, Harden, Durant, Lebron, Cousins, Davis, Westbrook, PG, Thompson, Leonard. Somewhere after 10 Butler fits in with guys like Lowry, Derozen, Lillard, LA, Wall, Paul.

Outside of Harden really, who in that top ten isn't a great two way player?
Westbrook.

Curry is a gambler on defense

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2016, 01:37:17 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8894
  • Tommy Points: 290
All star vs Good role player

Re: How much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2016, 01:47:57 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
Butler is top 15-20, Jae is top 30-50 player in the league.
It is a significant upgrade cause we could really use another scorer to put us in that contention spot. However, with both being a Marquette products, i would like to see them team up. I am sure they would too.
Both are versatile, but Butler is way better in ISO situations.
Jae top 30-50? 

Um no, not even close.  Crowder may not even be top 100 frankly.

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2016, 01:50:01 PM »

Offline Celtic_Pride777

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 325
  • Tommy Points: 35
All star vs Good role player

TP...basically

Re: How much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #20 on: July 07, 2016, 01:56:43 PM »

Offline max215

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8448
  • Tommy Points: 624
Butler is top 15-20, Jae is top 30-50 player in the league.
It is a significant upgrade cause we could really use another scorer to put us in that contention spot. However, with both being a Marquette products, i would like to see them team up. I am sure they would too.
Both are versatile, but Butler is way better in ISO situations.
Jae top 30-50? 

Um no, not even close.  Crowder may not even be top 100 frankly.

Forget 100, I'd like to see you name 50 players better than Jae.
Isaiah, you were lightning in a bottle.

DKC Clippers

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #21 on: July 07, 2016, 02:16:32 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
10%

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #22 on: July 07, 2016, 02:48:37 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Crowder per-36:  16.2 points, 5.8 rebounds, 2.1 assists, 2 steals with 44%/34%/82% shooting

Butler per-36:  20.4 points, 5.2 rebounds, 4.7 assists, 1.6 steals 45%/31%/83%

Butler has a usage rate of 23.9

Crowder has a usage rate of 17.6

That's 1.36x higher usage rate.   This math makes no [dang] sense, but let's multiply Crowder's Per-36 points and assists by 1.36:  22 points, 5.8 rebounds, 2.9 assists, 2 steals with 44%/34%/82%

Butler's like 10% better at most.  Role matters.  Jae took 11.1 shots per game.   Butler took 15.4 shots per game.  Crowder was actually a better 3-point shooter last season.   Difference is, Crowder was contributing to a playoff team and Butler was leading his team to the lottery. 


They went to the same school.   Compare their college stats.

2011-12 Crowder Sophomore stats:  17.5 points, 8.4 rebounds, 2.1 assists, 2.5 steals, 1 block with 50%/35%/76% shooting in 32.9mpg.

2010-11 Butler Junior stats:  15.7 points, 6.1 rebounds, 2.3 assists, 1.4 steals, 0.4 blocks, 49%/35%/78% in 34.6mpg

Crowder was better as a 2nd year college player than Butler was as a 3rd year College player.   Obviously both have improved.  Maybe Butler has improved more.  But Butler is also pretty overrated.  Premium Brand Ricky Davis.  Role matters.  I'll tell you one thing... trading #3 + Crowder for Butler would have been a bad move.

« Last Edit: July 07, 2016, 02:57:24 PM by LarBrd33 »

Re: How much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #23 on: July 07, 2016, 02:50:09 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Butler is top 15-20, Jae is top 30-50 player in the league.
It is a significant upgrade cause we could really use another scorer to put us in that contention spot. However, with both being a Marquette products, i would like to see them team up. I am sure they would too.
Both are versatile, but Butler is way better in ISO situations.
Jae top 30-50? 

Um no, not even close.  Crowder may not even be top 100 frankly.

Crowder probably has about equal value as IT.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #24 on: July 07, 2016, 04:29:36 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15245
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
10%
THANK-YOU for answering the OP's question.  I put it at 24.68%

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #25 on: July 07, 2016, 04:41:44 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13769
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
TP, Lar - we are in agreement on this one. Thank you for providing stats. Crowder finally had an opportunity to 'break out' last year. Why do we think he has no chance to improve as he continues to become a major player for this team?

I wouldn't mind Butler on the Cs - he would fit right in, but I am not trading Crowder and his amazing contract. Bradley, future pick(s) (not BKN '17), and other pieces (Rozier isn't a throw-in). With Turner gone, several players on this team - mainly Smart, Crowder, and Rozier - will have the opportunity to emerge as iso players in addition to their catch and shoot games.

Crowder is very good and the deal including him, Bradley, and the #3 is laughable. A team with Butler, Pau, Noah, Mirotic, Gibson, and a healthy Rose couldn't make the playoffs last year. We tied for 3rd.

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #26 on: July 07, 2016, 04:55:55 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51956
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Butler is a significant upgrade, and there's no way to tell how much of an upgrade until we know for sure that this year's Crowder wasn't just an aberration.

I still think it was a mistake that we didn't trade Butler for Crowder and the Brooklyn pick at the trade deadline. I think we'd have a good chance of coming out of the East with Butler instead of Crowder, with the possibility of adding another impact player next summer, too.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #27 on: July 07, 2016, 05:02:58 PM »

Offline 86MaxwellSmart

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3997
  • Tommy Points: 395
Crowder is a nice piece...but he can't "Take Over" a game, like Butler can at times.
Larry Bird was Greater than you think.

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2016, 05:18:28 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13769
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Crowder is a nice piece...but he can't "Take Over" a game, like Butler can at times.

Are you sure? Before last year, Crowder was just an after-thought. Butler has had a number of years to become the player he is, Crowder showed marked improvement throughout the year in his driving and pull-up jumper game. When he went down, the Cs blew sole ownership of the 3rd seed and, in turn, sucked it up in the playoffs. I think some are discounting Crowder's impact.

I really hope he comes out this year and blows up (in a good way). All indications are that he has that potential given his growth projectory (and tireless work ethic).

Re: By how much do you guys think Butler is better than Crowder?
« Reply #29 on: July 07, 2016, 05:38:52 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
I personally believe Ainge should hold out for Cousins. Keeping those picks, plus Bradley or Crowder, who can be each expendable should be more suitable than Butler.

TP to Labrd for the statistical evidence. But I'm not convinced Butler is really that much better. I think 12-15% better, but at what cost, and contract cost? (Cap friendly, but still twice as much as Crowder's.)

Butler is infinitely more athletic, so we could also argue that in Brad Steven's system; he would get a lot more open looks, make just as good passes as Isaiah Thomas, and probably become the heart and soul just as Jae Crowder has for us.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different