Author Topic: The Official 2016-2017 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (20-62, #1)  (Read 404689 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4782
  • Tommy Points: 1036
A collective yawn from CB as Brooklyn beats New York. A new low for the Knicks.

BKN magic number down to ten.

Mike
yes, a yawn. amazing isnt it? a few months ago such a win by the nets would have resulted in wide spread angst and agony throughout this blog. predictions about having a worthless pick would have blossomed like so many weeds.

yet here we sit, unfazed by such a victory. ours lives as celtic fans is indeed pretty good right now.  ;D

(Mike looks up, nervously seeking out the shoe that will likely fall and hit him squarely in the forehead.)

Mike

Offline Quetzalcoatl

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4100
  • Tommy Points: 419
The Nets have 12 wins (!) and 17 games remaining.  The Lakers have 20 wins as the next closest team.   So the Nets basically could go 9-8 over the remaining schedule and still give us the best lottery chances even if a 20-46 team loses the next 15 straight.  That is amazing.

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4782
  • Tommy Points: 1036
And, in other news, the Nets lost.

Magic number now nine.

Mike

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
Lakers have basically announced they are going to try to lose all of their remaining games. So assuming that they do, is it possible the Nets could go .500 and we lose the best lottery odds? Yes, of course it is.  We play them twice, and I must say those two games we should do everything possible to beat them.  Lakers have everything to gain to lose them all, while Nets have nothing to gain.

Offline libermaniac

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2941
  • Tommy Points: 385
Lakers have basically announced they are going to try to lose all of their remaining games. So assuming that they do, is it possible the Nets could go .500 and we lose the best lottery odds? Yes, of course it is.  We play them twice, and I must say those two games we should do everything possible to beat them.  Lakers have everything to gain to lose them all, while Nets have nothing to gain.
They've won 12 out of 66 and you are worried about 8 of 16?

Offline makaveli

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3154
  • Tommy Points: 321
  • The Truth
Lakers have basically announced they are going to try to lose all of their remaining games. So assuming that they do, is it possible the Nets could go .500 and we lose the best lottery odds? Yes, of course it is.  We play them twice, and I must say those two games we should do everything possible to beat them.  Lakers have everything to gain to lose them all, while Nets have nothing to gain.
They've won 12 out of 66 and you are worried about 8 of 16?
exactly, you almost made me look at the standings again. the nets are locked worst record
what doesn't kill you makes you stronger

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7835
  • Tommy Points: 770
I'm going to the Nets game tomorrow.

If anyone is watching at home, look for the 3 white guys and 1 biracial girl in Celtic swag.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4782
  • Tommy Points: 1036
I'm going to the Nets game tomorrow.

If anyone is watching at home, look for the 3 white guys and 1 biracial girl in Celtic swag.

Shouldn't be that tough. You may be the only fans at the game.

Mike

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7835
  • Tommy Points: 770
I'm going to the Nets game tomorrow.

If anyone is watching at home, look for the 3 white guys and 1 biracial girl in Celtic swag.

Shouldn't be that tough. You may be the only fans at the game.

Mike
lol

If there's anyone else there at all, they'll probably be Celtic fans too.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
Nets about to win again. Lakers still a threat to steal worst record. They will lose all their remaining games. Nets playing better, could see them finishing .500 over schedule balance.

Sure wish Isaiah was playing tomorrow.

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4782
  • Tommy Points: 1036
Nets about to win again. Lakers still a threat to steal worst record. They will lose all their remaining games. Nets playing better, could see them finishing .500 over schedule balance.

Sure wish Isaiah was playing tomorrow.

I'm trying to reconcile my natural pessimism with the laws of math. I don't want to be too confident that the Nets have this thing locked up but, with the recognition that jinxes don't actually exist, I took a look at their remaining schedule. I can find seven or eight games where they have a reasonable chance of winning (Your definition of reasonable may be different from mine.), but that's still going to be tough and would have to be combined with the Lakers losing every game between here and the end of the year.

Naturally, the Lakers are likely going to be the underdogs in every one of those games, but that's different than actually losing every one of them. Assuming that the Lakers have only a 10% chance of winning in each of those games (almost ludicrously low), there would still only be a 23% chance that they would actually do so. If the Lakers have a 20% chance of winning in each of those games, the likelihood that they lose all of them is 4%.

I think that there's going to be more sweating over the next month than we would have anticipated a few weeks ago, but ultimately, the Nets should have the worst record. Which, needless to say, is also not equivalent to having the first draft pick.

Mike

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
I will not be surprised if the Lakers do not win another game this season. They have no shame.

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18188
  • Tommy Points: 2747
  • bammokja
Nets about to win again. Lakers still a threat extremely remote possibility to steal worst record. They will lose all their remaining games. Nets playing better, could see them finishing .500 over schedule balance.

Sure wish Isaiah was playing tomorrow.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
Lowkey kind of worried about the nets catching the lakers. Their schedule is easy the rest of the way. We NEED to beat them tomorrow.

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
we need to do ourselves a solid tomorrow and beat the Nets.

Nets have done more than their share, we need to contribute to the cause.