This is the problem with analytics though. Is I think Ainge basically explores every scenario and then tries to take the bpa.
Every year I have never agreed with Chad Ford and guys like that in the past though. Players don't really don't turn out in the drafts too where he has them slotted.
Red on the other hand would just pick who he thought was best in ways. He had a different kind of vision. I'm trying to take who i like into account and what's possibly available.
Analytics has it's downfalls though.
Every method has its downfall. If there was a perfect way of scouting players, the draft wouldn't be such a crapshoot. It's all about using all the tool you can and weighing the results against each other
I think exploring every option I can by analytics Dunn is the bpa but it may also be via trade. other years I might just take Bender or Brown though. I don't think Bender is Porzingis. I think he is somewhere between that and Chriss. I think Brown has a ways to go too.
I'm reading too much Chad Ford these days however. Some of the reporting has either gotten better or I've just fallen for it. He used to be really stupid.
Vs just going with my gut and doing something more creative. I'm more just breaking it down here.
My gut says I prefer Hield over Murray. I know that much.
That's part of analytics though. It's not just numbers. It's a lot of things and how you feel about a player. How good he is.
Chad Ford is also still really stupid on a lot of things. I don't think he has this broken down like I do. That's what analytics tells me lol. Or just common sense.