'Good' also doesnt mean 'great' or 'excellent' or 'fantastic' or 'outstanding', etc.
You mean he didn't make 106 out of 100 jumpers, set a record in the Celtics death sprint, get Brad Stevens' personal endorsement, and posterize a lawn chair?
The post-workout hype always cracks me up.
I think he hpantazo has a fair point.
I've never heard bad feedback about a workout - you never really hear "the workout went poorly, the guy sucked".
But if you listen to the feedback about the workouts of guys Danny is reportedly interested in (Brown, Hield, Dunn) they seem to get a much more then just "the workout went good". They tend to gloat about how great an athlete the player is, how hard a worker they are, how much talent/potential they have, etc.
For example, Danny and Brad were absolutely throwing out superlatives last year after working out Rozier, RJ Hunter and even Mickey - pretty much gushing about how impressive they were.
If you look at the other guys who got siimlarly modest feedback (Chriss and Murray) they are the two guys who
werem't on the list of guys Danny apparently narrowed down to.
It seems that the word "good" in workout feedback seems to really mean "he's ok but we weren't blown away".
I would assume at this point it's probably down to Hield, Dunn and Brown - I'd be pretty thrilled with either to be honest.