Looks like someone else had a similar idea:

[/quote
The main take-away is the exclamation mark at the end of the picture: LeBron's lost more Finals than he's won. There is a big difference between winning 43% of your Finals appearances, having a losing record on the biggest stage, and being undefeated in six appearances.
If not for the murder of Jordan's father, Jordan likely would have won EIGHT straight Finals. Think about that and then consider all of the Hall of Famers he prevented from winning a championship. Malone and Stockton are the best pick-and-roll duo in history, but they have zero championships because of Jordan. Miller is one of the best shooters of all-time, but zero championships because of Jordan.
Without clutch threes from Ray Allen and Kyrie Irving, LeBron could be sitting on a Jerry West-like record of 1-6 in the Finals.
Yes, LeBron is the best all-around player of the 2010s, and probably still the best active player today, but he is nowhere close to touching 1990s Jordan nor will he ever be unless he wins the next four or five Finals in a row. I would bet everything I own that will not happen.
By the way, I do not understand comparing by age. Are we going to claim Kobe is the GOAT because he won three championships at age 23? I think not.