I understand that many would love this trade to happen but I actually hope it falls through.
Butler isn't that much better than Bradley and Bradley actually fits our scheme better because he's a better shooter and perimeter defender.
In Chicago Butler has shown that he can't play off the ball and the team struggled with lineups that had him and Rose on the court at the same time. How will this be different with IT and Smart?
As much as I hate to say it, I'd prefer Love
The narrative that Bradley is almost as good as Butler is just delusional. Butler is one of the top 12-15 players in the NBA the last two seasons and is one of the best two way players around. He scores, rebounds and assist better than Bradley and he is pretty close defensively.
No one is saying that Butler's not better. The question is "by how much"?
First of all, let's not overvalue him. Curry, Westbrook, Lebron, Davis, Leonard, Durant, George, Green, Cousins and Griffin are clearly ahead of him. That's 10. Then there's Lillard, Lowry, DeRozan, IT, Klay Thompson, Harden (all O, no D), Whiteside and a few others that Butler is in with. He's probably ahead of a few of those second tier guys and behind a few.
It's obvious that he's a very, very good player. But he's not a GREAT player. Bradley is merely a good player. We know that even while Butler is the focus of his offense and Bradley is not, Butler only outproduces Bradley by 4 points, 2 boards and 2 assists per 36. He doesn't outproduce Bradley on the defensive end. So Butler is an upgrade but not an exceptional one from a statistical standpoint. People here don't give Bradley enough credit for becoming a better-than-average pro.
So if Butler isn't an incredible statistical upgrade over Bradley and he's not a defensive upgrade, then he must be a better fit in the system, right? But there's a real concern on how Butler's game fits with this team. Butler is not a great outside shooter - an area Bradley has worked his tail off to become quite good at. Butler is a slasher who can get to the line and can create his own shot. But so can IT. Because opposing players can - and almost have to - sag off Butler does that narrow the lane for IT? How does that impact the offense? It's a reasonable question. And once that's figured out, is the increase in production worth the #3 pick and increased salary cap?
I don't have all the answers to those questions. But I do know enough to at least ask them. I think a case can easily be made that due to Bradley, Butler is not worth as much to the Celtics as he is to his own team or some other team. The same case can be made that assets like the #3 pick are better spent elsewhere to get "more bang for the buck".