I thought LB's definition of in their prime was a player between 23 and 25? Now a 27 year old Teague is in his prime. Interesting
?
I said that NBA players tend to make their most dramatic improvements statistically before the age of 23. Obviously it's well known their "prime" is 27 years old.
You're talking about two different things. You see guys like LeBron, Durant, etc make leaps before the age 23. It's rare to see them make leaps after 23. They still, obviously, improve throughout their 20s: http://wagesofwins.com/nba-players-age-like-milk/
Fair to say you overvalued those assets?
When? When I suggested they could trade Noel for Teague months ago? Seems like I properly valued those assets based on this rumor.
Fair to say you undervalued those assets when you suggested it's impossible for Philly to improve their roster balance by trading guys like Noel? So far, yes.
How many PG's would you take ahead of Teague? That position is absolutely loaded across the league, so in essence they spent 4 years developing a player, who actually didn't improve much if at all, and traded him for a player that would be a backup PG on about half the teams in the league and could easily be a rental. Shrewd. Very shrewd.
Teague is totally the type of player that would make sense in Philly. There's fair points about needing to give him a max contract a year from now to stay. That'd be interesting, but Philly needs to spend money somewhere and Noel's on the final year of his rookie deal (as folks love to keep pointing out).
Meh. Let's see what happens. No point in having an opinion on it yet when we don't know the following.
#1 - If this will even happen.
#2 - What else Philly would give up (or vice versa)
#3 - What Philly intends to do with their other assets
#4 - How Philly would address the contract situation.
Should be interesting, though. I knew Philly would be one of the most fascinating teams this Summer and so far that's been the case.