Author Topic: Revisiting Sully  (Read 8288 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #30 on: May 09, 2016, 08:33:42 PM »

Offline Smart457

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 424
  • Tommy Points: 23
4 years 16 million total.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #31 on: May 09, 2016, 08:44:23 PM »

Offline trickybilly

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5857
  • Tommy Points: 643
What happens if nobody offers him a deal. Do the Celts have to sign him? Or if the Celts don't he becomes a ufa?

Gota feeling if nobody signs him, Danny will for a 3 year 6-7 million  a year

I think we can relinquish our rights on him. We have rights which means we can also relinquish them and he becomes unrestricted. the celtics haven't done that as of yet though is the point.  So there's still a chance lol.

Ainge is going to let everything and the process to play out anyways.  Keeping him restricted causes other teams to bid etc..  Keeps options open for sign and trades etc I believe as well.
He has a $3.2 million qualifying offer. If we extend a QO, he becomes a RFA. If he is a RFA, we have the right to match each offer he gets. If he doesn't get any offers (including from the Celtics), he can just sign the QO and play for that.

If he signs the QO we have effectively signed him, so yeah -- he has to play for us. To the extent to which the QO is a cap hold as soon as it becomes extended, this is largely an irrelevant scenario, though. I am not sure what the rules are about rescinding QOs.

Also, Wyc's "two max contracts" only work if we non-tended Sullinger, Johnson, Jerebko and Turner, so I'm not sure it's really going to happen the way he describes it.

A few things:

1) Sully's QO will be $4.43 million, because he met the starter criteria, which gives him the same QO as the 9th pick in his draft.  Any other number you read is wrong.

2) His cap hold is $5.67 million.  If we do not renounce him, regardless of whether or not we've extended a QO, he will count this much against our cap until he is signed.  If he signs the QO, he obviously then takes up the amount of his new contract.

3) The QO can be rescinded unilaterally until July 23rd, assuming he hasn't signed it by then.  If the Celtics need the space for a free agent, they can take back the offer and renounce him, making him an unrestricted free agent with no Bird rights.

4) The Celtics CAN keep some combination of Turner, Sullinger, Jerebko, and maybe even Amir, AND sign two max free agents -- depending, of course, on what a given free agent's max contract is.  They've got room for Durant and Horford, but Barnes and Whiteside would each command about $5.5 million less if given the max, creating $11 million more cap space if both were signed instead of Durant and Horford.  If they get one from Column A and one from Column B, they could keep one of Turner, Sullinger, and Jerebko.  Depending where their draft picks finish up, how high the cap goes, and a few other details, the C's could have a lot of wiggle room even after two maxes.

Great Post. Amazed about the "rescind QO by July 23" thing, news to me. Surely someone gives him an offer before then though. Do you on what date teams can start making offers to Sully?
"Gimme the ball, gimme the ball". Freddy Quimby, 1994.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #32 on: May 09, 2016, 08:49:38 PM »

Offline dannyboy35

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2050
  • Tommy Points: 110
Other than Mark Blount I can't think of a guy at the moment that is less deserving to wear the uniform. Doesn't deserve to wear ANY nba uniform.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #33 on: May 09, 2016, 08:51:05 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37811
  • Tommy Points: 3030
Sully maybe seen on Weds and Saturdays at the DQ

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #34 on: May 09, 2016, 11:45:11 PM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
What happens if nobody offers him a deal. Do the Celts have to sign him? Or if the Celts don't he becomes a ufa?

Gota feeling if nobody signs him, Danny will for a 3 year 6-7 million  a year

I think we can relinquish our rights on him. We have rights which means we can also relinquish them and he becomes unrestricted. the celtics haven't done that as of yet though is the point.  So there's still a chance lol.

Ainge is going to let everything and the process to play out anyways.  Keeping him restricted causes other teams to bid etc..  Keeps options open for sign and trades etc I believe as well.
He has a $3.2 million qualifying offer. If we extend a QO, he becomes a RFA. If he is a RFA, we have the right to match each offer he gets. If he doesn't get any offers (including from the Celtics), he can just sign the QO and play for that.

If he signs the QO we have effectively signed him, so yeah -- he has to play for us. To the extent to which the QO is a cap hold as soon as it becomes extended, this is largely an irrelevant scenario, though. I am not sure what the rules are about rescinding QOs.

Also, Wyc's "two max contracts" only work if we non-tended Sullinger, Johnson, Jerebko and Turner, so I'm not sure it's really going to happen the way he describes it.

A few things:

1) Sully's QO will be $4.43 million, because he met the starter criteria, which gives him the same QO as the 9th pick in his draft.  Any other number you read is wrong.

2) His cap hold is $5.67 million.  If we do not renounce him, regardless of whether or not we've extended a QO, he will count this much against our cap until he is signed.  If he signs the QO, he obviously then takes up the amount of his new contract.

3) The QO can be rescinded unilaterally until July 23rd, assuming he hasn't signed it by then.  If the Celtics need the space for a free agent, they can take back the offer and renounce him, making him an unrestricted free agent with no Bird rights.

4) The Celtics CAN keep some combination of Turner, Sullinger, Jerebko, and maybe even Amir, AND sign two max free agents -- depending, of course, on what a given free agent's max contract is.  They've got room for Durant and Horford, but Barnes and Whiteside would each command about $5.5 million less if given the max, creating $11 million more cap space if both were signed instead of Durant and Horford.  If they get one from Column A and one from Column B, they could keep one of Turner, Sullinger, and Jerebko.  Depending where their draft picks finish up, how high the cap goes, and a few other details, the C's could have a lot of wiggle room even after two maxes.

Great Post. Amazed about the "rescind QO by July 23" thing, news to me. Surely someone gives him an offer before then though. Do you on what date teams can start making offers to Sully?

Teams can start negotiating with him on July 1st, same as any other free agent.  He can sign an offer sheet with another team July 11th, I think (whatever that Monday is, since the 10th falls on a Sunday).  If he signs an offer sheet, the C's have three days to match it, although they can accept or decline at any point during this period.  Once an offer sheet has been submitted to the C's, they have two choices -- accept or decline.  They cannot negotiate a sign-and-trade at this point.  However, prior to the offer sheet's submission, they could negotiate such a deal, and complete a sign-and-trade rather than just choosing to decline the offer sheet.

Furthermore, if Sullinger were to sign an offer sheet that the C's matched, then he could not be traded for one year.  Also, any offer must be for at least two seasons, not including options.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #35 on: May 09, 2016, 11:57:29 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
He should have been shown the door immediately after his arrest for domestic violence, in my view, but with our luck, Ainge will resign both him and Zeller to max deals ::). Ugh.  Renounce of all our free agents, please.  We can easily get better players in the draft, imo.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #36 on: May 10, 2016, 12:37:10 AM »

Offline loco_91

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2087
  • Tommy Points: 145
At this point, Sully is a back up plan. Not a terrible one - he certainly had his moments this past year. He is really talented, but he doesn't provide the versatility we need from a big man on either end.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #37 on: May 10, 2016, 12:50:44 AM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
I had very high hopes for sully. I bought into the old "Kevin Love of the east" comments. He showed us flashes of how good he could be. But I don't think he wants it. Sorry sully, but this is the end of your time as a Boston Celtic.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #38 on: May 10, 2016, 01:29:56 AM »

Offline loco_91

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2087
  • Tommy Points: 145

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #39 on: May 10, 2016, 04:37:05 AM »

Offline makaveli

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3154
  • Tommy Points: 321
  • The Truth
4 years 16 million total.

lol
at this point he would be happy to get a 1+1 team option 2 year 8 mil...
what doesn't kill you makes you stronger

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #40 on: May 10, 2016, 06:33:15 AM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
What happens if nobody offers him a deal. Do the Celts have to sign him? Or if the Celts don't he becomes a ufa?

Gota feeling if nobody signs him, Danny will for a 3 year 6-7 million  a year

I think we can relinquish our rights on him. We have rights which means we can also relinquish them and he becomes unrestricted. the celtics haven't done that as of yet though is the point.  So there's still a chance lol.

Ainge is going to let everything and the process to play out anyways.  Keeping him restricted causes other teams to bid etc..  Keeps options open for sign and trades etc I believe as well.
He has a $3.2 million qualifying offer. If we extend a QO, he becomes a RFA. If he is a RFA, we have the right to match each offer he gets. If he doesn't get any offers (including from the Celtics), he can just sign the QO and play for that.

If he signs the QO we have effectively signed him, so yeah -- he has to play for us. To the extent to which the QO is a cap hold as soon as it becomes extended, this is largely an irrelevant scenario, though. I am not sure what the rules are about rescinding QOs.

Also, Wyc's "two max contracts" only work if we non-tended Sullinger, Johnson, Jerebko and Turner, so I'm not sure it's really going to happen the way he describes it.

A few things:

1) Sully's QO will be $4.43 million, because he met the starter criteria, which gives him the same QO as the 9th pick in his draft.  Any other number you read is wrong.

2) His cap hold is $5.67 million.  If we do not renounce him, regardless of whether or not we've extended a QO, he will count this much against our cap until he is signed.  If he signs the QO, he obviously then takes up the amount of his new contract.

3) The QO can be rescinded unilaterally until July 23rd, assuming he hasn't signed it by then.  If the Celtics need the space for a free agent, they can take back the offer and renounce him, making him an unrestricted free agent with no Bird rights.

4) The Celtics CAN keep some combination of Turner, Sullinger, Jerebko, and maybe even Amir, AND sign two max free agents -- depending, of course, on what a given free agent's max contract is.  They've got room for Durant and Horford, but Barnes and Whiteside would each command about $5.5 million less if given the max, creating $11 million more cap space if both were signed instead of Durant and Horford.  If they get one from Column A and one from Column B, they could keep one of Turner, Sullinger, and Jerebko.  Depending where their draft picks finish up, how high the cap goes, and a few other details, the C's could have a lot of wiggle room even after two maxes.

TP

how on Earth do you know so much about salaries and cap space?

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #41 on: May 10, 2016, 07:05:14 AM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
nope, he blew it, couldn't even stay in shape on a contract year. Has already had a fractured foot and back surgery because of the weight. His health isn't going to magically get better as he ages, especially with that body and poor work ethic/ attitude.

See ya Sully.

AB and even Crowder have had these same injury issues though because of increased time.  Same with KO.  I more feel like none of these guys are conditioned to be playing the minutes they are at this stage in their careers.  KO doesn't play a ton of minutes either and always seems to get hurt.

At least Sully was out there all season.  He was more durable this year than any of those guys funny enough.

This is what I mean with fans though.  They used to beat up on KO because of his defense when Sully was untouchable around that time and was just as bad that year.

AB and Crowder have an excuse - nobody on this team pushes their body harder then those two guys do on a nightly basis.

Sully barely moves out there and he still gets injured.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #42 on: May 10, 2016, 07:21:00 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20148
  • Tommy Points: 1335
Quote
Sorry sully, but this is the end of your time as a Boston Celtic.

It is all on him.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #43 on: May 10, 2016, 07:24:57 AM »

Offline LGC88

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1500
  • Tommy Points: 167
Danny give many chances to Sully. He was stupid enough to not seize any of them.
Therefore, he can't be a Celtics.
Bye Sully.

Re: Revisiting Sully
« Reply #44 on: May 10, 2016, 10:39:04 AM »

Offline spikelovetheCelts

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1616
  • Tommy Points: 113
  • Peace it's a board. We all will never agree.
4 years 16 million total.

lol
at this point he would be happy to get a 1+1 team option 2 year 8 mil...
He will get more this year to much free money out there. He is not worthy of this much but he just happen to be in the league the right year. I would give him the 5.7 for the coming year if we can't find better.
"People look at players, watch them dribble between their legs and they say, 'There's a superstar.'  Well John Havlicek is a superstar, and most of the others are figments of writers' imagination."
--Jerry West, on John Havlicek