Crowder smart and a top 3 pick is an overpay for buttler
Butler us arguably the best SG in the NBA.
Crowder is not even top 5 at his position, Smart is a one dimensional role player, and the none of the guys in this year's draft looks like a surefire star.
It's absolutely not an overpay. Butler is by far the best asset in that deal.
Are you serious? Giving up Jae and Smart with BKN pick is not an overpay for Butler? Do you watch our games man? You take out those two and replace them with Butler and we win 20+ games this season. And I love Jimmy.
I was pushing for the Bulls or the Pistons first round matchup versus the Cavs (instead it seems they will face spineless Indy (sweep)), but in the end I am little bit glad the Bulls will miss the playoffs. They didn't deserve it and they are a completely messed up team. There's a good chance they go full rebuild and if we get third or lower pick, I would consider to trade it,along with maybe two other picks (non BKN) and fillers, for Butler. No way I'm including Jae or Smart, no way.
The problem is that you're allowing your emotional attachment to the individual players / people blind your judgement.
* The Brooklyn pick is a high lottery pick
* Crowder is a good starter
* Smart is a prospect who is still fairly raw
You're talking about trading a high lottery pick, a good starter and a fairly raw prospect...for a two-way perennial All-Star (superstar, even) in his mid 20s who is top 2 at his position, and locked in to a decent, long term contract.
Think of it that way and its definately not an overpay.
Also you want to offer a pick outside the top 2, plus two utterly mediocre picks, for Jimmy Butler? The Bulls GM will laugh so hard he'll probably fall of his chair. Why on earth would they trade a young superstar on a long term contract for a bunch of draft pics in a mediocre draft? That's utterly rediculous. They'll want at least one proven young player, at least one prospect with upside, and a lottery pick.
You're criminally underrating Butler's value.