i flinch when watching youngs defense and i allways have to put this into the context of being 20yrs old{sometimes it takes days)
my son is 21 and crazy all over the place, do we cut bait on these two kids at 20 and 22 -lemme tell you the red claws have players setting three point records
-i remember everybody loving the young choice
i am in general against drafting 18 year olds
ah, its a tough life being an armchair general but i do know the difference between good defense and poor and fortunately we have some great which makes poor seem abysmal
why draft these young kids that need mens bodies if you can;t allow them to mature
Young at the time looked like an excellent choice.
An 18 yo who had a good season with Kentucky (14.3 ppg, 34.5 3p%, able to grab some rebs too (5.3 per 40 mins))
The only red flags were his low FT% (70) and esp. his D. But even so, until he had the accident he was a candidate for the draft's top-10.
Most of us thought that DA did the smart thing: drafting a talented player who moved down the draft due to a minor car accident that that did not threaten his bball career.
Then I don't know what happened...I'm even more surprised since Stevens is good at developing young talents. Young is probably the kind of player who needs big mins to gain confidence and perform well, but after two years this is hardly a good enough excuse.
With Hunter, I'm less surprised. He was selected with a lower pick, and he was a player with known flaws to start with. Still, his performance is lower than my low expectations

He is less afraid to shoot than Young, but he is still very very raw both offensively and defensively.